Where does Mitsubishi Heavy Industries Engine & Turbocharger, Ltd. rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), Mitsubishi Heavy Industries Engine & Turbocharger, Ltd. ranks #1,497 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

What is Mitsubishi Heavy Industries Engine & Turbocharger, Ltd.'s Innovation Score?

Mitsubishi Heavy Industries Engine & Turbocharger, Ltd. has an Innovation Score of 56.3 out of 100 (top 6% of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

Is Mitsubishi Heavy Industries Engine & Turbocharger, Ltd.'s patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

Mitsubishi Heavy Industries Engine & Turbocharger, Ltd.'s recent grant velocity is +407% compared to the prior five-year period (grant years, not application filing dates). This indicates accelerating grant output.

What does claim depth mean for Mitsubishi Heavy Industries Engine & Turbocharger, Ltd.'s patents?

Mitsubishi Heavy Industries Engine & Turbocharger, Ltd.'s patents average 9.6 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView Foreign Corporation

Mitsubishi Heavy Industries Engine & Turbocharger, Ltd.

Q: How many patents does Mitsubishi Heavy Industries Engine & Turbocharger, Ltd. hold?

Mitsubishi Heavy Industries Engine & Turbocharger, Ltd. holds 278 US utility patents granted between 2018 and 2025, spanning 63 technology areas.

Q: What technology areas does Mitsubishi Heavy Industries Engine & Turbocharger, Ltd. focus on?

Mitsubishi Heavy Industries Engine & Turbocharger, Ltd.'s top technology area is F02B (Internal-combustion Piston ENGINES; Combustion Engines IN General) with 178 patents. Grants appear in 63 CPC subclasses total.

Q: How is the Mitsubishi Heavy Industries Engine & Turbocharger, Ltd. patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 278 granted patents across 63 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2018–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: F02B (Internal-combustion Piston ENGINES; Combustion Engines IN General).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Mitsubishi ranks #1,497 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 278 patents across 63 technology areas.

#1,497
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: Top 6%
by Innovation Score (56.3/100): 9.6
avg claims per patent: +407%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R1497 · Foreign Corporation #1,497 · 278 grants

GRANTS-MID · TOP-DECILE · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-WIDE · INNOV-PAR · CLAIMS-PAR · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-SURGE · BOOK-FULL

GRANTS-MID 278 grants
TOP-DECILE #1,497/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH Amkor Technology…
CPC-WIDE F02B · 63 areas
INNOV-PAR 56.3/100
CLAIMS-PAR 9.6 claims/avg
TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
VEL-SURGE +407% vel
BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Amkor Technology Singapore Holding Pte. Ltd. (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
Adeka · near

56
Mitsubishi Heavy… · this assignee

56
Newfrey · near

56
Safran Transmission… · near

56
Technische Universit… · near

56
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows Mitsubishi's Innovation Score is 56.3/100 (top 6% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

How Mitsubishi's grant cadence moved

Between 2020–2024, Mitsubishi Heavy Industries Engine & Turbocharger, Ltd. received 213 grants versus 42 in 2015–2019 (+407% equal-window velocity, top decile growth). Across complete PatentsView years, output peaked in 2021 at 55 grants and bottomed in 2018 at 16. Lead class F02B accounts for 64% of the portfolio across 63 subclasses. Volume neighbours: Amkor Technology Singapore Holding Pte. Ltd. (#1,493) and Conti Temic microelectronic GmbH (#1,501).

Mitsubishi's three-year grant acceleration

From 2019–2021 to 2022–2024, Mitsubishi Heavy Industries Engine & Turbocharger, Ltd. moved from 125 to 114 grants (0.91x the prior three-year total, a multiple, not a CAGR). Among 3,296 tracked assignees with ≥100 grants and ≥20 prior-period grants, that multiple ranks #1,440. See the growth leaderboard.

Amkor Technology…

278
Carestream Health

278
Dassault Systemes

278
Infineon Americas

278
Rapid7

278
Tableau Software

278
Vega Grieshaber KG

278
Mitsubishi Heavy… ◀

278
Conti Temic micro…

277

What this shows Mitsubishi holds 278 patents at rank #1,497, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near Mitsubishi

By rank, the assignees closest to #1,497 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in F02B (Internal-combustion Piston Engines)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Mitsubishi's primary technology class.

Assignees with similar portfolio profiles

Two PlainPatent-derived peer sets for Mitsubishi, neither rank-band nor same-CPC leaders (those blocks stay above).

Similar innovation score

Nearest assignees by Innovation Score (56 here).

Adeka Corporation 56 Safran Transmission Systems 56 Newfrey LLC 56 Technische Universiteit Delft 56

Similar claim depth

Nearest assignees by average claims per patent (9.6 here).

Yakima Products, Inc. 9.6 avg Minebea Mitsumi Inc. 9.6 avg Avery Dennison Retail Information Services LLC 9.5 avg Osterhout Group, Inc. 9.6 avg

Mitsubishi's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

56 Top 6% higher than 94% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2018–2025

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2018–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

Mitsubishi Heavy Industries Engine & Turbocharger, Ltd. patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2018	16	5.8%
2019	26	9.4%
2020	44	15.8%
2021	55	19.8%
2022	49	17.6%
2023	34	12.2%
2024	31	11.2%
2025partial year	23	8.3%

Which technologies does Mitsubishi Heavy Industries Engine & Turbocharger, Ltd. patent most?

F02B - Internal-combustion Piston ENGINES; Combustion Engines IN General 178

F05D - Indexing Scheme FOR Aspects Relating TO Non-positive-displacement Machines OR Engines, Gas-turbines OR Jet-propulsion Plants 170

Y02T - Climate Change Mitigation Technologies Related TO Transportation 135

F01D - Non-positive Displacement Machines OR Engines, e.g. Steam Turbines 130

F04D - Non-positive-displacement Pumps 98

F02C - Gas-turbine PLANTS; AIR Intakes FOR Jet-propulsion PLANTS; Controlling Fuel Supply IN Air-breathing Jet-propulsion Plants 52

F02D - Controlling Combustion Engines 34

F02M - Supplying Combustion Engines IN General With Combustible Mixtures OR Constituents Thereof 32

F16C - SHAFTS; Flexible SHAFTS; Elements OR Crankshaft MECHANISMS; Rotary Bodies Other Than Gearing ELEMENTS; Bearings 31

F01N - Gas-flow Silencers OR Exhaust Apparatus FOR Machines OR Engines IN GENERAL; Gas-flow Silencers OR Exhaust Apparatus FOR Internal-combustion Engines 14

H02K - Dynamo-electric Machines 12

G01M - Testing Static OR Dynamic Balance OF Machines OR STRUCTURES; Testing OF Structures OR Apparatus, NOT Otherwise Provided FOR 11

F02F - Cylinders, Pistons OR Casings, FOR Combustion ENGINES; Arrangements OF Sealings IN Combustion Engines 10

F01M - Lubricating OF Machines OR Engines IN GENERAL; Lubricating Internal Combustion ENGINES; Crankcase Ventilating 10

F16F - SPRINGS; SHOCK-ABSORBERS; Means FOR Damping Vibration 8

Top 15 of 63 technology areas

Where it ranks

Overall rank by patents

#1,497

of 49,997 tracked assignees

Innovation Score

56.3 out of 100

View all rankings →

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

Mitsubishi Heavy Industries Engine & Turbocharger, Ltd.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.

Mitsubishi Heavy Industries Engine & Turbocharger, Ltd.'s lead technology class is F02B (Internal-combustion Piston ENGINES; Combustion Engines IN General), 64% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore F02B
Ranked #1,497 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare Mitsubishi Heavy Industries Engine & Turbocharger, Ltd. against Amkor Technology Singapore Holding Pte. Ltd., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 56.3/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent, US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.