CPC technology class · F16
F16F - Springs
Springs; shock-absorbers; means for damping vibration. 10,113 US utility patents granted 2015–2025, with the leading assignees and year-by-year grant trajectory.
- 10,113
- US patents granted
- #7/14
- in F16
- 7.3%
- F16 class share
- -9%
- 5-yr velocity
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Springs ranks #171 of 670 CPC technology areas - 10,113 US patents granted since 2015, with recorded grant volume down 9% over five years.
- #171
- of 670 CPC technology areas
- 10,113
- US patents granted, 2015–2025
- Fox Factory
- leading assignee (263)
- -9%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
How F16F's grant cadence moved
Between 2020–2024, F16F recorded 4,302 grants versus 4,726 in 2015–2019 (-9% equal-window velocity). Across complete years, output peaked in 2019 at 1,138 grants and bottomed in 2024 at 767 (+48% peak-over-trough). Lead assignee Fox Factory, Inc. holds 2.6% of the class ; the top three share 6.2%.
Leaderboard read
F16F concentration, lead at 2.6%
Fox Factory, Inc. leads this historical grant record at 2.6% of F16F - foreign corporation assignees hold 66% of class grants (3,544 of 5,342). Figures describe granted US utility patents in this CPC subclass, not current investment or legal strength.
- Leader's share
- 2.6%
- Top three share
- 6.2%
- Lead over #2
- 54
263 of 10,113 grants
of the class's recorded grants
more grants than Schaeffler Technologies AG & Co. KG
Where F16F sits inside F16
Among 14 subclasses in F16 (Engineering Elements AND UNITS; General Measures FOR Producing AND Maintaining Effective Functioning OF Machines OR INSTALLATIONS; Thermal Insulation IN General), F16F ranks #7 and holds 7.3% of the parent class's 137,714 recorded grants. Sibling chips below are the other subclasses in the same parent class, not the nationwide volume/lead-share peers further down.
Rising assignees active in F16F
Company-wide grant multiples (2022–2024 vs 2019–2021) among assignees with ≥5 patents in this subclass. Growth is company-wide; class patent counts are subclass-specific.
- #1 HL Mando Corporation 212x 0 → 212 company-wide · 15 in F16F
- #2 Prospira Corporation 21x 0 → 21 company-wide · 25 in F16F
- #3 Vibracoustic SE 19x 0 → 19 company-wide · 21 in F16F
- #4 Hitachi Astemo, Ltd. 18x 49 → 871 company-wide · 103 in F16F
- #5 Moshun, LLC 16x 0 → 16 company-wide · 25 in F16F
F16F grants by year, peak 2019 (1,138)
US utility-patent grants per year in F16F, 2015–2025 - recent five years are down 9% versus 2015–2019.
Who leads F16F?
The 12 most active assignees in SPRINGS; SHOCK-ABSORBERS; Means FOR Damping Vibration - wider bars mean more grants
- Fox Factory
Fox Factory, Inc.
263 patents
- Schaeffler & Kg
Schaeffler Technologies AG & Co. KG
209 patents
- Zf Friedrichshafen
ZF Friedrichshafen AG
153 patents
- Kyb
KYB Corporation
145 patents
- Sumitomo Riko
Sumitomo Riko Company Limited
130 patents
- Exedy
Exedy Corporation
120 patents
- Firestone Industrial…
Firestone Industrial Products Company, LLC
114 patents
- Hitachi Astemo 103
Hitachi Astemo, Ltd.
103 patents
- Bridgestone 92
Bridgestone Corporation
92 patents
- Showa 90
Showa Corporation
90 patents
- Nhk Spring 89
NHK Spring Co., Ltd.
89 patents
- Beijing West… 89
Beijing West Industries Co., Ltd.
89 patents
What this shows Fox Factory is the most active filer in F16F, holding 263 of the 10,113 patents in this class. Concentration at the top signals how contestable this technology area is for new entrants.
View data table
| Rank | Company | Patents in F16F |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | Fox Factory, Inc. | 263 |
| #2 | Schaeffler Technologies AG & Co. KG | 209 |
| #3 | ZF Friedrichshafen AG | 153 |
| #4 | KYB Corporation | 145 |
| #5 | Sumitomo Riko Company Limited | 130 |
| #6 | Exedy Corporation | 120 |
| #7 | Firestone Industrial Products Company, LLC | 114 |
| #8 | Hitachi Astemo, Ltd. | 103 |
| #9 | Bridgestone Corporation | 92 |
| #10 | Showa Corporation | 90 |
| #11 | NHK Spring Co., Ltd. | 89 |
| #12 | Beijing West Industries Co., Ltd. | 89 |
| #13 | Tenneco Automotive Operating Company LLC | 81 |
| #14 | Valeo Embrayages | 81 |
| #15 | Goodrich Corporation | 80 |
| #16 | thyssenkrupp AG | 68 |
| #17 | thyssenkrupp Bilstein GmbH | 57 |
| #18 | Mandom Corporation | 53 |
| #19 | Driv Automotive Inc. | 53 |
| #20 | Textron Innovations Inc. | 45 |
Footprint here vs. claim strategy
Each dot is a leading F16F assignee, placed by how many patents it holds in this class (horizontal) against its company-wide average claims per patent (vertical) - a read on whether the class is led by broad-but-shallow filers or focused deep-claim players.
Classes near F16F's 10,113-grant footprint
Nationwide nearest neighbors for F16F (#171 of 670 by volume ; lead share 2.6%) - not the F16 parent-class siblings above.
Nearest by grant volume
Questions about F16F
Which company holds the most patents in F16F?
Which F16F assignees grew fastest recently?
How does F16F compare inside parent class F16?
What to do with this data
F16F in context - here's where to go next.
- Fox Factory, Inc. leads F16F with 263 grants in this class. See full portfolio
- F16F ranks #171 of 670 by grant volume among all tracked CPC technology areas. See the ranking
- Inside parent class F16, the largest sibling subclass is F16H with 27,860 grants. Explore F16H
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through 2026-05-15; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Methodology - F16F figures are USPTO PatentsView granted-utility totals for this subclass (10,113 grants in the tracked window).
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.