Overall rank by patents
#1,501
Across all tracked assignees
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 277 granted patents across 101 technology areas, active 2015–2025. Filing-trend and competitive-moat analysis cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search. Primary class: G06V (IMAGE OR VIDEO RECOGNITION OR UNDERSTANDING).
The verdict
Conti holds 277 US patents across 101 technology areas, rank #1,501 of 50,000 tracked assignees.
Conti Temic Microelectronic Gmbh has been granted 277 US utility patents between 2015 and 2025, placing Conti Temic Microelectronic Gmbh at rank #1,501 across all assignees tracked by PlainPatent. This portfolio spans 101 distinct Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) subclasses, averaging 14.5 claims per patent with primary concentration in G06V (IMAGE OR VIDEO RECOGNITION OR UNDERSTANDING). As a Foreign Corporation, Conti Temic Microelectronic Gmbh is one of the broader-portfolio assignees in the PatentsView dataset. By volume, Conti sits between Mitsubishi Heavy Industries Engine & Turbocharger, Ltd. (278 patents, rank #1,497) and Lotes Co., Ltd (276 patents, rank #1,505) - the closest US assignees by grant volume. The composite Innovation Score of 56.4/100 blends portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth into a single comparable measure drawn directly from USPTO PatentsView records.
Filing cadence tells the strategic story. Between 2020 and 2025 the company received 130 grants, compared with 147 in the 2015–2019 window, a -12% shift in five-year velocity. A cooling filing rate may reflect portfolio consolidation, shifting priorities, or reduced R&D throughput. The Foreign Corporation classification further shapes interpretation, since corporate, government, and individual filers pursue patents for materially different reasons.
Claim depth and technology breadth together indicate competitive posture. Conti Temic Microelectronic Gmbh's 14.5 average claims per patent sits within the typical range for solid legal coverage without excessive prosecution cost, while a diversified footprint across 100+ CPC subclasses spreads risk across many technology fronts. Combined with portfolio volume, these signals let analysts, investors, and licensing professionals benchmark Conti Temic Microelectronic Gmbh against peers pursuing similar technology classes.
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
MITSUBISHI HEAVY INDUSTRIES ENGINE & TURBOCHARGER, LTD.
278 patents
Rapid7, Inc.
278 patents
Tableau Software, Inc.
278 patents
VEGA Grieshaber KG
278 patents
Nippon Shokubai Co., Ltd.
277 patents
RingCentral, Inc.
277 patents
Triad National Security, LLC
277 patents
Conti Temic microelectronic GmbH
277 patents
LOTES CO., LTD
276 patents
What this shows Conti holds 277 patents at rank #1,501, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
By rank, the assignees closest to #1,501 in granted patent volume.
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Conti's primary technology class.
Conti's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
56 Top 6% higher than 94% of 50,000 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 19 | 6.9% |
| 2016 | 24 | 8.7% |
| 2017 | 38 | 13.7% |
| 2018 | 28 | 10.1% |
| 2019 | 38 | 13.7% |
| 2020 | 41 | 14.8% |
| 2021 | 25 | 9.0% |
| 2022 | 14 | 5.1% |
| 2023 | 15 | 5.4% |
| 2024 | 21 | 7.6% |
| 2025 | 14 | 5.1% |
Top 15 of 101 technology areas
Overall rank by patents
#1,501
Across all tracked assignees
56.4 out of 100
How to use this portfolio
Conti's 277 grants land it in the top 6% by Innovation Score, but volume alone doesn't tell you where the strength sits.
Patent counts and the Innovation Score measure patenting activity, not commercial success or the legal strength of any patent. Many patents are filed defensively. Verify the status of an individual patent against official USPTO records.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.