Overall rank by patents
#4,268
Across all tracked assignees
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 84 granted patents across 40 technology areas, active 2015–2025. Filing-trend and competitive-moat analysis cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search. Primary class: A61N (ELECTROTHERAPY; MAGNETOTHERAPY; RADIATION THERAPY; ULTRASOUND THERAPY).
The verdict
The holds 84 US patents across 40 technology areas, rank #4,268 of 50,000 tracked assignees.
The Alfred E. Mann Foundation For Scientific Research has been granted 84 US utility patents between 2015 and 2025, placing The Alfred E. Mann Foundation For Scientific Research at rank #4,268 across all assignees tracked by PlainPatent. This portfolio spans 40 distinct Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) subclasses, averaging 20.2 claims per patent with primary concentration in A61N (ELECTROTHERAPY; MAGNETOTHERAPY; RADIATION THERAPY; ULTRASOUND THERAPY). As a US Corporation, The Alfred E. Mann Foundation For Scientific Research is one of the more focused assignees in the PatentsView dataset. By volume, The sits between Spatial Digital Systems, Inc. (84 patents, rank #4,264) and Arteris, Inc. (83 patents, rank #4,272) - the closest US assignees by grant volume. The composite Innovation Score of 56.2/100 blends portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth into a single comparable measure drawn directly from USPTO PatentsView records.
Filing cadence tells the strategic story. Between 2020 and 2025 the company received 40 grants, compared with 44 in the 2015–2019 window, a -9% shift in five-year velocity. A cooling filing rate may reflect portfolio consolidation, shifting priorities, or reduced R&D throughput. The US Corporation classification further shapes interpretation, since corporate, government, and individual filers pursue patents for materially different reasons.
Claim depth and technology breadth together indicate competitive posture. The Alfred E. Mann Foundation For Scientific Research's 20.2 average claims per patent reflects complex, broadly scoped inventions that are difficult for competitors to design around, while a multi-domain presence across 40 subclasses balances depth with breadth. Combined with portfolio volume, these signals let analysts, investors, and licensing professionals benchmark The Alfred E. Mann Foundation For Scientific Research against peers pursuing similar technology classes.
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
SPATIAL DIGITAL SYSTEMS, INC.
84 patents
Seville Classics Inc.
84 patents
TOWER PARTNERS SEMICONDUCTOR CO., LTD.
84 patents
TP Lab, Inc.
84 patents
Valspar Sourcing, Inc.
84 patents
XIAMEN TIANMA DISPLAY TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD.
84 patents
ZHUHAI PANTUM ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.
84 patents
The Alfred E. Mann Foundation for Scientific Research
84 patents
ARTERIS, INC.
83 patents
What this shows The holds 84 patents at rank #4,268, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
By rank, the assignees closest to #4,268 in granted patent volume.
Other assignees with the most granted patents in The's primary technology class.
The's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
56 Top 6% higher than 94% of 50,000 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 11 | 13.1% |
| 2016 | 4 | 4.8% |
| 2017 | 16 | 19.0% |
| 2018 | 6 | 7.1% |
| 2019 | 7 | 8.3% |
| 2020 | 8 | 9.5% |
| 2021 | 5 | 6.0% |
| 2022 | 2 | 2.4% |
| 2023 | 9 | 10.7% |
| 2024 | 8 | 9.5% |
| 2025 | 8 | 9.5% |
Top 15 of 40 technology areas
Overall rank by patents
#4,268
Across all tracked assignees
56.2 out of 100
How to use this portfolio
The's 84 grants land it in the top 6% by Innovation Score, but volume alone doesn't tell you where the strength sits.
Patent counts and the Innovation Score measure patenting activity, not commercial success or the legal strength of any patent. Many patents are filed defensively. Verify the status of an individual patent against official USPTO records.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.