CPC technology class · A61
A61F - Filters Implantable Into Blood Vessels
Filters implantable into blood vessels; prostheses; devices providing patency to, or preventing collapsing of, tubular structures of the body, e.g. stents; orthopaedic, nursing or contraceptive devices; fomentation; treatment or protection of eyes or ears; bandages, dressings or absorbent pads; firs. 50,959 US utility patents granted 2015–2025, with the leading assignees and year-by-year grant trajectory.
- 50,959
- US patents granted
- #5/13
- in A61
- 7.9%
- A61 class share
- +1%
- 5-yr velocity
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Filters Implantable Into Blood Vessels ranks #33 of 670 CPC technology areas - 50,959 US patents granted since 2015, with recorded grant volume up 1% over five years.
- #33
- of 670 CPC technology areas
- 50,959
- US patents granted, 2015–2025
- The Procter & Gamble
- leading assignee (1,426)
- +1%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
How A61F's grant cadence moved
Between 2020–2024, A61F recorded 23,172 grants versus 22,963 in 2015–2019 (+1% equal-window velocity). Across complete years, output peaked in 2019 at 5,209 grants and bottomed in 2015 at 4,303 (+21% peak-over-trough). Lead assignee The Procter & Gamble Company holds 2.8% of the class ; the top three share 7.1%.
Leaderboard read
A61F concentration, lead at 2.8%
The Procter & Gamble Company leads this historical grant record at 2.8% of A61F - us corporation assignees hold 71% of class grants (29,648 of 41,575). Figures describe granted US utility patents in this CPC subclass, not current investment or legal strength.
- Leader's share
- 2.8%
- Top three share
- 7.1%
- Lead over #2
- 325
1,426 of 50,959 grants
of the class's recorded grants
more grants than Boston Scientific Scimed, Inc.
Where A61F sits inside A61
Among 13 subclasses in A61 (Medical OR Veterinary SCIENCE; Hygiene), A61F ranks #5 and holds 7.9% of the parent class's 646,867 recorded grants. Sibling chips below are the other subclasses in the same parent class, not the nationwide volume/lead-share peers further down.
Rising assignees active in A61F
Company-wide grant multiples (2022–2024 vs 2019–2021) among assignees with ≥5 patents in this subclass. Growth is company-wide; class patent counts are subclass-specific.
- #1 Therabody, Inc. 119x 1 → 119 company-wide · 11 in A61F
- #2 Solventum Intellectual Properties Company 88x 0 → 88 company-wide · 68 in A61F
- #3 Boston Scientific Medical Device Limited 66x 0 → 66 company-wide · 6 in A61F
- #4 IX Innovation LLC 55x 1 → 55 company-wide · 11 in A61F
- #5 Hytto PTE. Ltd. 33x 0 → 33 company-wide · 6 in A61F
A61F grants by year, peak 2019 (5,209)
US utility-patent grants per year in A61F, 2015–2025 - recent five years are up 1% versus 2015–2019.
Who leads A61F?
The 12 most active assignees in Filters Implantable Into Blood VESSELS; PROSTHESES; Devices Providing Patency TO, OR Preventing Collapsing OF, Tubular Structures OF THE Body, e.g. STENTS; Orthopaedic, Nursing OR Contraceptive DEVICES; FOMENTATION; Treatment OR Protection OF Eyes OR EARS; Bandages, Dressings OR Absorbent PADS; Firs - wider bars mean more grants
- The Procter & Gamble
The Procter & Gamble Company
1,426 patents
- Boston Scientific…
Boston Scientific Scimed, Inc.
1,101 patents
- Edwards Lifesciences
Edwards Lifesciences Corporation
1,101 patents
- Depuy Synthes Products
DePuy Synthes Products, Inc.
851 patents
- Globus Medical
Globus Medical, Inc.
752 patents
- Cook Medical
Cook Medical Technologies LLC
700 patents
- Smith & Nephew 541
Smith & Nephew, Inc.
541 patents
- Covidien 528
Covidien LP
528 patents
- Alcon 489
Alcon Inc.
489 patents
- Kimberly-clark… 427
Kimberly-Clark Worldwide, Inc.
427 patents
- W L Gore & Associates 420
W.L. Gore & Associates GmbH
420 patents
- Kci Licensing 417
KCI Licensing, Inc.
417 patents
What this shows The Procter & Gamble is the most active filer in A61F, holding 1,426 of the 50,959 patents in this class. Concentration at the top signals how contestable this technology area is for new entrants.
View data table
| Rank | Company | Patents in A61F |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | The Procter & Gamble Company | 1,426 |
| #2 | Boston Scientific Scimed, Inc. | 1,101 |
| #3 | Edwards Lifesciences Corporation | 1,101 |
| #4 | DePuy Synthes Products, Inc. | 851 |
| #5 | Globus Medical, Inc. | 752 |
| #6 | Cook Medical Technologies LLC | 700 |
| #7 | Smith & Nephew, Inc. | 541 |
| #8 | Covidien LP | 528 |
| #9 | Alcon Inc. | 489 |
| #10 | Kimberly-Clark Worldwide, Inc. | 427 |
| #11 | W.L. Gore & Associates GmbH | 420 |
| #12 | KCI Licensing, Inc. | 417 |
| #13 | Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. | 415 |
| #14 | Howmedica Osteonics Corp. | 392 |
| #15 | Abbott Cardiovascular Systems, Inc. | 385 |
| #16 | Medtronic Vascular, Inc. | 383 |
| #17 | Coloplast A/S | 378 |
| #18 | Unicharm Corporation | 369 |
| #19 | Zimmer, Inc. | 363 |
| #20 | Medtronic, Inc. | 318 |
Footprint here vs. claim strategy
Each dot is a leading A61F assignee, placed by how many patents it holds in this class (horizontal) against its company-wide average claims per patent (vertical) - a read on whether the class is led by broad-but-shallow filers or focused deep-claim players.
Classes near A61F's 50,959-grant footprint
Nationwide nearest neighbors for A61F (#33 of 670 by volume ; lead share 2.8%) - not the A61 parent-class siblings above.
Nearest by grant volume
Questions about A61F
Which company holds the most patents in A61F?
Which A61F assignees grew fastest recently?
How does A61F compare inside parent class A61?
What to do with this data
A61F in context - here's where to go next.
- The Procter & Gamble Company leads A61F with 1,426 grants in this class. See full portfolio
- A61F ranks #33 of 670 by grant volume among all tracked CPC technology areas. See the ranking
- Inside parent class A61, the largest sibling subclass is A61B with 162,009 grants. Explore A61B
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through 2026-05-15; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Methodology - A61F figures are USPTO PatentsView granted-utility totals for this subclass (50,959 grants in the tracked window).
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.