Overall rank by patents
#4,265
Across all tracked assignees
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 84 granted patents across 5 technology areas, active 2015–2025. Filing-trend and competitive-moat analysis cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search. Primary class: A47B (TABLES; DESKS; OFFICE FURNITURE; CABINETS; DRAWERS; GENERAL DETAILS OF FURNITURE).
The verdict
Seville holds 84 US patents across 5 technology areas, rank #4,265 of 50,000 tracked assignees.
Seville Classics Inc. has been granted 84 US utility patents between 2015 and 2025, placing Seville Classics Inc. at rank #4,265 across all assignees tracked by PlainPatent. This portfolio spans 5 distinct Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) subclasses, averaging 3.6 claims per patent with primary concentration in A47B (TABLES; DESKS; OFFICE FURNITURE; CABINETS; DRAWERS; GENERAL DETAILS OF FURNITURE). As a US Corporation, Seville Classics Inc. is one of the more focused assignees in the PatentsView dataset. By volume, Seville sits between Shanghai Hengrui Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. (84 patents, rank #4,261) and Valspar Sourcing, Inc. (84 patents, rank #4,269) - the closest US assignees by grant volume. The composite Innovation Score of 29.7/100 blends portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth into a single comparable measure drawn directly from USPTO PatentsView records.
Filing cadence tells the strategic story. Between 2020 and 2025 the company received 30 grants, compared with 54 in the 2015–2019 window, a -44% shift in five-year velocity. A cooling filing rate may reflect portfolio consolidation, shifting priorities, or reduced R&D throughput. The US Corporation classification further shapes interpretation, since corporate, government, and individual filers pursue patents for materially different reasons.
Claim depth and technology breadth together indicate competitive posture. Seville Classics Inc.'s 3.6 average claims per patent suggests focused, narrowly drawn claims typical of single-invention filings, while concentration in 5 subclasses points to a focused technical program. Combined with portfolio volume, these signals let analysts, investors, and licensing professionals benchmark Seville Classics Inc. against peers pursuing similar technology classes.
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
SHANGHAI HENGRUI PHARMACEUTICAL CO., LTD.
84 patents
SOCLEAN, INC.
84 patents
SOMFY ACTIVITES SA
84 patents
SPATIAL DIGITAL SYSTEMS, INC.
84 patents
TOWER PARTNERS SEMICONDUCTOR CO., LTD.
84 patents
TP Lab, Inc.
84 patents
The Alfred E. Mann Foundation for Scientific Research
84 patents
Valspar Sourcing, Inc.
84 patents
Seville Classics Inc.
84 patents
What this shows Seville holds 84 patents at rank #4,265, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
By rank, the assignees closest to #4,265 in granted patent volume.
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Seville's primary technology class.
Seville's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
30 Top 68% higher than 32% of 50,000 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 9 | 10.7% |
| 2016 | 12 | 14.3% |
| 2017 | 16 | 19.0% |
| 2018 | 8 | 9.5% |
| 2019 | 9 | 10.7% |
| 2020 | 8 | 9.5% |
| 2021 | 5 | 6.0% |
| 2022 | 4 | 4.8% |
| 2023 | 3 | 3.6% |
| 2024 | 7 | 8.3% |
| 2025 | 3 | 3.6% |
Top 5 of 5 technology areas
Overall rank by patents
#4,265
Across all tracked assignees
29.7 out of 100
How to use this portfolio
Seville's 84 grants land it in the top 68% by Innovation Score, but volume alone doesn't tell you where the strength sits.
Patent counts and the Innovation Score measure patenting activity, not commercial success or the legal strength of any patent. Many patents are filed defensively. Verify the status of an individual patent against official USPTO records.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.