Overall rank by patents
#369
Across all tracked assignees
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 1,178 granted patents across 81 technology areas, active 2015–2025. Filing-trend and competitive-moat analysis cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search. Primary class: A61N (ELECTROTHERAPY; MAGNETOTHERAPY; RADIATION THERAPY; ULTRASOUND THERAPY).
The verdict
Cardiac holds 1,178 US patents across 81 technology areas, rank #369 of 50,000 tracked assignees.
Cardiac Pacemakers, Inc. has been granted 1,178 US utility patents between 2015 and 2025, placing Cardiac Pacemakers, Inc. at rank #369 across all assignees tracked by PlainPatent. This portfolio spans 81 distinct Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) subclasses, averaging 17.9 claims per patent with primary concentration in A61N (ELECTROTHERAPY; MAGNETOTHERAPY; RADIATION THERAPY; ULTRASOUND THERAPY). As a US Corporation, Cardiac Pacemakers, Inc. is one of the broader-portfolio assignees in the PatentsView dataset. By volume, Cardiac sits between Cummins Inc. (1,191 patents, rank #365) and Quanta Computer Inc. (1,171 patents, rank #373) - the closest US assignees by grant volume. The composite Innovation Score of 64.0/100 blends portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth into a single comparable measure drawn directly from USPTO PatentsView records.
Filing cadence tells the strategic story. Between 2020 and 2025 the company received 457 grants, compared with 721 in the 2015–2019 window, a -37% shift in five-year velocity. A cooling filing rate may reflect portfolio consolidation, shifting priorities, or reduced R&D throughput. The US Corporation classification further shapes interpretation, since corporate, government, and individual filers pursue patents for materially different reasons.
Claim depth and technology breadth together indicate competitive posture. Cardiac Pacemakers, Inc.'s 17.9 average claims per patent sits within the typical range for solid legal coverage without excessive prosecution cost, while a multi-domain presence across 81 subclasses balances depth with breadth. Combined with portfolio volume, these signals let analysts, investors, and licensing professionals benchmark Cardiac Pacemakers, Inc. against peers pursuing similar technology classes.
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
Cummins Inc.
1,191 patents
HRL Laboratories, LLC
1,188 patents
UOP LLC
1,188 patents
Vestas Wind Systems A/S
1,179 patents
Cardiac Pacemakers, Inc.
1,178 patents
Karsten Manufacturing Corporation
1,177 patents
KLA-TENCOR CORPORATION
1,173 patents
SMITH & NEPHEW, INC.
1,172 patents
QUANTA COMPUTER INC.
1,171 patents
What this shows Cardiac holds 1,178 patents at rank #369, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
By rank, the assignees closest to #369 in granted patent volume.
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Cardiac's primary technology class.
Cardiac's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
64 Top 2% higher than 98% of 50,000 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 193 | 16.4% |
| 2016 | 159 | 13.5% |
| 2017 | 153 | 13.0% |
| 2018 | 90 | 7.6% |
| 2019 | 126 | 10.7% |
| 2020 | 121 | 10.3% |
| 2021 | 109 | 9.3% |
| 2022 | 99 | 8.4% |
| 2023 | 63 | 5.3% |
| 2024 | 42 | 3.6% |
| 2025 | 23 | 2.0% |
Top 15 of 81 technology areas
Overall rank by patents
#369
Across all tracked assignees
64.0 out of 100
How to use this portfolio
Cardiac's 1,178 grants land it in the top 2% by Innovation Score, but volume alone doesn't tell you where the strength sits.
Patent counts and the Innovation Score measure patenting activity, not commercial success or the legal strength of any patent. Many patents are filed defensively. Verify the status of an individual patent against official USPTO records.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.