Overall rank by patents
#37,215
Across all tracked assignees
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 7 granted patents across 4 technology areas, active 2020–2022. Filing-trend and competitive-moat analysis cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search. Primary class: A63F (CARD, BOARD, OR ROULETTE GAMES; INDOOR GAMES USING SMALL MOVING PLAYING BODIES; VIDEO GAMES; GAMES NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR).
The verdict
Rec holds 7 US patents across 4 technology areas, rank #37,215 of 50,000 tracked assignees.
Rec Room Inc. has been granted 7 US utility patents between 2020 and 2022, placing Rec Room Inc. at rank #37,215 across all assignees tracked by PlainPatent. This portfolio spans 4 distinct Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) subclasses, averaging 19.4 claims per patent with primary concentration in A63F (CARD, BOARD, OR ROULETTE GAMES; INDOOR GAMES USING SMALL MOVING PLAYING BODIES; VIDEO GAMES; GAMES NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR). As a US Corporation, Rec Room Inc. is one of the more focused assignees in the PatentsView dataset. By volume, Rec sits between Read Twogether Ltd (7 patents, rank #37,211) and Red Oak Innovations Limited (7 patents, rank #37,219) - the closest US assignees by grant volume. The composite Innovation Score of 28.6/100 blends portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth into a single comparable measure drawn directly from USPTO PatentsView records.
Filing cadence tells the strategic story. Historical data spans 2020 through 2022, with 7 total grants over that period. Velocity comparisons require five years of historical filings to calibrate. The US Corporation classification further shapes interpretation, since corporate, government, and individual filers pursue patents for materially different reasons.
Claim depth and technology breadth together indicate competitive posture. Rec Room Inc.'s 19.4 average claims per patent sits within the typical range for solid legal coverage without excessive prosecution cost, while specialization in 4 subclasses reflects a tightly scoped invention area. Combined with portfolio volume, these signals let analysts, investors, and licensing professionals benchmark Rec Room Inc. against peers pursuing similar technology classes.
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
Read Twogether Ltd
7 patents
Real Ryder, LLC
7 patents
Real Time Tomography, LLC
7 patents
Realme Mobile Telecommunications (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd
7 patents
Red Hawk, L.L.C.
7 patents
Red Lion 49 Limited
7 patents
Red Mountain Med Spa, LLC
7 patents
Red Oak Innovations Limited
7 patents
Rec Room Inc.
7 patents
What this shows Rec holds 7 patents at rank #37,215, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
By rank, the assignees closest to #37,215 in granted patent volume.
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Rec's primary technology class.
Rec's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
29 Top 72% higher than 28% of 50,000 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2020–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2020 | 2 | 28.6% |
| 2021 | 3 | 42.9% |
| 2022 | 2 | 28.6% |
Top 4 of 4 technology areas
Overall rank by patents
#37,215
Across all tracked assignees
28.6 out of 100
How to use this portfolio
Rec's 7 grants land it in the top 72% by Innovation Score, but volume alone doesn't tell you where the strength sits.
Patent counts and the Innovation Score measure patenting activity, not commercial success or the legal strength of any patent. Many patents are filed defensively. Verify the status of an individual patent against official USPTO records.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.