Red Oak Innovations Limited
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 7 granted patents across 9 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2019–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: H10K (Organic Electric Solid-state Devices).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Red ranks #37,200 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 7 patents across 9 technology areas.
- #37,200
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 24th percentile
- by Innovation Score (27.6/100)
- 16.3
- avg claims per patent
- -100%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R37200 · Foreign Corporation #37,200 · 7 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 7 grants
- MID-PACK #37,200/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Rec Room
- CPC-NARROW H10K · 9 areas
- INNOV-THIN 27.6/100
- CLAIMS-RICH 16.3 claims/avg
- TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
- VEL-DROP -100% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Rec Room Inc. (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Red’s 27.6 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Red
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Red Oak Innovations · this assignee 28
Red Oak Innovations · this assignee
28 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Red's Innovation Score is 27.6/100 (24th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Red?
Each dot is one of Red’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Red’s own 16.3 claims/patent is at or below the 16.4 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.
Where Red's grants concentrate
Red Oak Innovations Limited is a focused PatentsView assignee: 9 CPC subclasses with 71.4% of grants classified under H10K (Organic Electric Solid-state Devices). By volume, Red sits between Rec Room Inc. and Redline Innovations, Inc.
Who files at Red's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Rec Room
Rec Room Inc.
7 patents
- Red Hawk L L C
Red Hawk, L.L.C.
7 patents
- Red Lion 49
Red Lion 49 Limited
7 patents
- Red Mountain Med…
Red Mountain Med Spa, LLC
7 patents
- Redflow R&D Pty
RedFlow R&D Pty Ltd
7 patents
- Redsky
RedSky Technologies, Inc.
7 patents
- Redbud Labs
Redbud Labs, Inc.
7 patents
- Redline Innovatio…
Redline Innovations, Inc
7 patents
- Red Oak Innovatio… ◀
Red Oak Innovations Limited
7 patents
What this shows Red holds 7 patents at rank #37,219, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Red
By rank, the assignees closest to #37,219 in granted patent volume.
- Rec Room Inc. #37,215 · 7 patents
- Red Hawk, L.L.C. #37,216 · 7 patents
- Red Lion 49 Limited #37,217 · 7 patents
- Red Mountain Med Spa, LLC #37,218 · 7 patents
- RedFlow R&D Pty Ltd #37,220 · 7 patents
- RedSky Technologies, Inc. #37,221 · 7 patents
- Redbud Labs, Inc. #37,222 · 7 patents
- Redline Innovations, Inc #37,223 · 7 patents
Leaders in H10K (Organic Electric Solid-state Devices)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Red's primary technology class.
- Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. 12,550 in class
- BOE Technology Group Co., Ltd. 4,700 in class
- LG Display Co., Ltd. 3,613 in class
- Semiconductor Energy Laboratory Co., Ltd. 2,381 in class
- Chengdu BOE Optoelectronics Technology Co., Ltd. 1,241 in class
- Japan Display Inc. 1,176 in class
- Wuhan China Star Optoelectronics Semiconductor Display Technology Co., Ltd. 1,105 in class
- Universal Display Corporation 1,023 in class
Red's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
28 24th percentile higher than 24% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2019–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 1 | 14.3% |
| 2025partial year | 6 | 85.7% |
Which technologies does Red Oak Innovations Limited patent most?
Top 9 of 9 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Red Oak Innovations Limited's patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Red Oak Innovations Limited's lead technology class is H10K (Organic Electric Solid-state Devices), 71.4% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore H10K
- Ranked #37,200 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Red Oak Innovations Limited against Rec Room Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 27.6/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.