Where does Red Hawk, L.L.C. rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), Red Hawk, L.L.C. ranks #37,197 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does Red Hawk, L.L.C. hold?

Red Hawk, L.L.C. holds 7 US utility patents granted between 2016 and 2021, spanning 3 technology areas.

What is Red Hawk, L.L.C.'s Innovation Score?

Red Hawk, L.L.C. has an Innovation Score of 15.4 out of 100 (3rd percentile of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

Is Red Hawk, L.L.C.'s patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

Red Hawk, L.L.C.'s recent grant velocity is -83% compared to the prior five-year period (grant years, not application filing dates). Grant activity has slowed relative to earlier years.

What does claim depth mean for Red Hawk, L.L.C.'s patents?

Red Hawk, L.L.C.'s patents average 3.6 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the Red Hawk, L.L.C. patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView US Corporation

Red Hawk, L.L.C.

Q: What technology areas does Red Hawk, L.L.C. focus on?

Red Hawk, L.L.C.'s top technology area is B60Q (Arrangement OF Signalling OR Lighting Devices, THE Mounting OR Supporting Thereof OR Circuits Therefor, FOR Vehicles IN General) with 1 patents, ranking #487 of 750 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 3 CPC subclasses total.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 7 granted patents across 3 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2016–2021. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: B60Q (Arrangement OF Signalling OR Lighting Devices, THE Mounting OR Supporting Thereof OR Circuits Therefor, FOR Vehicles IN General).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Red ranks #37,197 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 7 patents across 3 technology areas.

#37,197
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: 3rd percentile
by Innovation Score (15.4/100): 3.6
avg claims per patent: -83%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R37197 · US Corporation #37,197 · 7 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-LOW · CLAIMS-SPARSE · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL

GRANTS-MICRO 7 grants
MID-PACK #37,197/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH Real Ryder
CPC-NARROW B60Q · 3 areas
INNOV-LOW 15.4/100
CLAIMS-SPARSE 3.6 claims/avg
TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
VEL-DROP -83% vel
BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Real Ryder, LLC (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Red’s 15.4 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 7.2 pts (47%) Velocity 0.0 pts (0%) Breadth 6.1 pts (40%) Claim depth 2.1 pts (14%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
Red Hawk L L C · this assignee

15
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows Red's Innovation Score is 15.4/100 (3rd percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Red?

Each dot is one of Red’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Red’s own 3.6 claims/patent is at or below the 16.3 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.

Red vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Red's grants concentrate

Red Hawk, L.L.C. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 3 CPC subclasses with 14.3% of grants classified under B60Q (Arrangement OF Signalling OR Lighting Devices, THE Mounting OR Supporting Thereof OR Circuits Therefor, FOR Vehicles IN General). Peak complete grant year is 2016 (4 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2017. By volume, Red sits between Real Ryder, LLC and RedFlow R&D Pty Ltd.

Real Ryder

7
Real Time Tomogra…

7
Realme Mobile Tel…

7
Rec Room

7
Red Lion 49

7
Red Mountain Med…

7
Red Oak Innovatio…

7
Redflow R&D Pty

7
Red Hawk L L C ◀

7

What this shows Red holds 7 patents at rank #37,216, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near Red

By rank, the assignees closest to #37,216 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in B60Q (Arrangement OF Signalling OR Lighting Devices)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Red's primary technology class.

Red's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

15 3rd percentile higher than 3% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2016–2021

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2016–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

Red Hawk, L.L.C. patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2016	4	57.1%
2017	1	14.3%
2018	1	14.3%
2021	1	14.3%

Which technologies does Red Hawk, L.L.C. patent most?

B60Q - Arrangement OF Signalling OR Lighting Devices, THE Mounting OR Supporting Thereof OR Circuits Therefor, FOR Vehicles IN General 1

F21S - Non-portable Lighting DEVICES; Systems THEREOF; Vehicle Lighting Devices Specially Adapted FOR Vehicle Exteriors 1

F21Y - Indexing Scheme Associated With Subclasses F21k, F21l, F21s and F21v, Relating TO THE Form OR THE Kind OF THE Light Sources OR OF THE Colour OF THE Light Emitted 1

Top 3 of 3 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

Red Hawk, L.L.C.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.

Red Hawk, L.L.C.'s lead technology class is B60Q (Arrangement OF Signalling OR Lighting Devices, THE Mounting OR Supporting Thereof OR Circuits Therefor, FOR Vehicles IN General), 14.3% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore B60Q
Ranked #37,197 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare Red Hawk, L.L.C. against Real Ryder, LLC, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 15.4/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent , US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.