Overall rank by patents
#1,158
Across all tracked assignees
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 367 granted patents across 11 technology areas, active 2015–2025. Filing-trend and competitive-moat analysis cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search. Primary class: A63F (CARD, BOARD, OR ROULETTE GAMES; INDOOR GAMES USING SMALL MOVING PLAYING BODIES; VIDEO GAMES; GAMES NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR).
The verdict
Kabam holds 367 US patents across 11 technology areas, rank #1,158 of 50,000 tracked assignees.
Kabam, Inc. has been granted 367 US utility patents between 2015 and 2025, placing Kabam, Inc. at rank #1,158 across all assignees tracked by PlainPatent. This portfolio spans 11 distinct Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) subclasses, averaging 18.0 claims per patent with primary concentration in A63F (CARD, BOARD, OR ROULETTE GAMES; INDOOR GAMES USING SMALL MOVING PLAYING BODIES; VIDEO GAMES; GAMES NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR). As a US Corporation, Kabam, Inc. is one of the more focused assignees in the PatentsView dataset. By volume, Kabam sits between Trustees OF Dartmouth College (368 patents, rank #1,154) and Arcelormittal (366 patents, rank #1,162) - the closest US assignees by grant volume. The composite Innovation Score of 48.2/100 blends portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth into a single comparable measure drawn directly from USPTO PatentsView records.
Filing cadence tells the strategic story. Between 2020 and 2025 the company received 148 grants, compared with 219 in the 2015–2019 window, a -32% shift in five-year velocity. A cooling filing rate may reflect portfolio consolidation, shifting priorities, or reduced R&D throughput. The US Corporation classification further shapes interpretation, since corporate, government, and individual filers pursue patents for materially different reasons.
Claim depth and technology breadth together indicate competitive posture. Kabam, Inc.'s 18.0 average claims per patent sits within the typical range for solid legal coverage without excessive prosecution cost, while concentration in 11 subclasses points to a focused technical program. Combined with portfolio volume, these signals let analysts, investors, and licensing professionals benchmark Kabam, Inc. against peers pursuing similar technology classes.
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
TRUSTEES OF DARTMOUTH COLLEGE
368 patents
YEDA RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CO. LTD.
368 patents
Convida Wireless, LLC
367 patents
Enplas Corporation
367 patents
Owens-Brockway Glass Container Inc.
367 patents
Rubrik, Inc.
367 patents
Westinghouse Electric Company LLC
367 patents
Kabam, Inc.
367 patents
ArcelorMittal
366 patents
What this shows Kabam holds 367 patents at rank #1,158, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
By rank, the assignees closest to #1,158 in granted patent volume.
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Kabam's primary technology class.
Kabam's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
48 Top 17% higher than 83% of 50,000 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 34 | 9.3% |
| 2016 | 49 | 13.4% |
| 2017 | 63 | 17.2% |
| 2018 | 33 | 9.0% |
| 2019 | 40 | 10.9% |
| 2020 | 30 | 8.2% |
| 2021 | 29 | 7.9% |
| 2022 | 24 | 6.5% |
| 2023 | 33 | 9.0% |
| 2024 | 22 | 6.0% |
| 2025 | 10 | 2.7% |
Top 11 of 11 technology areas
Overall rank by patents
#1,158
Across all tracked assignees
48.2 out of 100
How to use this portfolio
Kabam's 367 grants land it in the top 17% by Innovation Score, but volume alone doesn't tell you where the strength sits.
Patent counts and the Innovation Score measure patenting activity, not commercial success or the legal strength of any patent. Many patents are filed defensively. Verify the status of an individual patent against official USPTO records.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.