Where does Reactive Surfaces Ltd., LLP rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), Reactive Surfaces Ltd., LLP ranks #23,274 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does Reactive Surfaces Ltd., LLP hold?

Reactive Surfaces Ltd., LLP holds 12 US utility patents granted between 2019 and 2025, spanning 14 technology areas.

What is Reactive Surfaces Ltd., LLP's Innovation Score?

Reactive Surfaces Ltd., LLP has an Innovation Score of 49.2 out of 100 (top 15% of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

Is Reactive Surfaces Ltd., LLP's patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

Reactive Surfaces Ltd., LLP's recent grant velocity is +800% compared to the prior five-year period (grant years, not application filing dates). This indicates accelerating grant output.

What does claim depth mean for Reactive Surfaces Ltd., LLP's patents?

Reactive Surfaces Ltd., LLP's patents average 19.3 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the Reactive Surfaces Ltd., LLP patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView US Corporation

Reactive Surfaces Ltd., LLP

Q: What technology areas does Reactive Surfaces Ltd., LLP focus on?

Reactive Surfaces Ltd., LLP's top technology area is C09D (Coating Compositions, e.g. Paints, Varnishes OR LACQUERS; Filling PASTES; Chemical Paint OR INK REMOVERS; INKS; Correcting FLUIDS; WOODSTAINS; Pastes OR Solids FOR Colouring OR PRINTING; USE OF Materials Therefor) with 11 patents, ranking #276 of 1,818 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 14 CPC subclasses total.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 12 granted patents across 14 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2019–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: C09D (Coating Compositions, e.g. Paints, Varnishes OR LACQUERS; Filling PASTES; Chemical Paint OR INK REMOVERS; INKS; Correcting FLUIDS; WOODSTAINS; Pastes OR Solids FOR Colouring OR PRINTING; USE OF Materi).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Reactive ranks #23,274 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 12 patents across 14 technology areas.

#23,274
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: Top 15%
by Innovation Score (49.2/100): 19.3
avg claims per patent: +800%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R23274 · US Corporation #23,274 · 12 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-FOCUS · INNOV-PAR · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-SURGE · BOOK-FULL

GRANTS-MICRO 12 grants
MID-PACK #23,274/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH Ransburg Industrial…
CPC-FOCUS C09D · 14 areas
INNOV-PAR 49.2/100
CLAIMS-RICH 19.3 claims/avg
TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
VEL-SURGE +800% vel
BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Ransburg Industrial Finishing K.K. (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Reactive’s 49.2 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 8.9 pts (18%) Velocity 15.6 pts (32%) Breadth 13.2 pts (27%) Claim depth 11.6 pts (24%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
Reactive Surfaces LLP · this assignee

49
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows Reactive's Innovation Score is 49.2/100 (top 15% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Reactive?

Each dot is one of Reactive’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Reactive’s own 19.3 claims/patent is ABOVE the 15.7 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.

Reactive vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Reactive's grants concentrate

Reactive Surfaces Ltd., LLP is a focused PatentsView assignee: 14 CPC subclasses with 91.7% of grants classified under C09D (Coating Compositions, e.g. Paints, Varnishes OR LACQUERS; Filling PASTES; Chemical Paint OR INK REMOVERS; INKS; Correcting FLUIDS; WOODSTAINS; Pastes OR Solids FOR Colouring OR PRINTING; USE OF Materi). Peak complete grant year is 2023 (3 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2019. By volume, Reactive sits between Ransburg Industrial Finishing K.K. and Research Now Group, LLC.

Reactive's three-year grant acceleration

Reactive Surfaces Ltd., LLP shows 7 grants in 2022–2024 against only 3 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.

Ransburg Industri…

12
Ravenwhite Securi…

12
Reflow Medical

12
Remynd

12
Real Innovations…

12
Red Bank

12
Rescale

12
Research Now Group

12
Reactive Surfaces… ◀

12

What this shows Reactive holds 12 patents at rank #23,291, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near Reactive

By rank, the assignees closest to #23,291 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in C09D (Coating Compositions)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Reactive's primary technology class.

Reactive's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

49 Top 15% higher than 85% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2019–2025

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2019–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

Reactive Surfaces Ltd., LLP patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2019	1	8.3%
2020	1	8.3%
2021	1	8.3%
2022	1	8.3%
2023	3	25.0%
2024	3	25.0%
2025partial year	2	16.7%

Which technologies does Reactive Surfaces Ltd., LLP patent most?

C09D - Coating Compositions, e.g. Paints, Varnishes OR LACQUERS; Filling PASTES; Chemical Paint OR INK REMOVERS; INKS; Correcting FLUIDS; WOODSTAINS; Pastes OR Solids FOR Colouring OR PRINTING; USE OF Materials Therefor 11

A01N - Preservation OF Bodies OF Humans OR Animals OR Plants OR Parts Thereof ; Biocides, e.g. AS Disinfectants, AS Pesticides OR AS Herbicides ; Pest Repellants OR ATTRACTANTS; Plant Growth Regulators 6

C12N - Microorganisms OR ENZYMES; Compositions THEREOF; Propagating, Preserving, OR Maintaining MICROORGANISMS; Mutation OR Genetic ENGINEERING; Culture Media 5

C25D - Processes FOR THE Electrolytic OR Electrophoretic Production OF COATINGS; ELECTROFORMING; Apparatus Therefor 3

C12Y - Enzymes 3

C09J - ADHESIVES; Non-mechanical Aspects OF Adhesive Processes IN GENERAL; Adhesive Processes NOT Provided FOR ELSEWHERE; USE OF Materials AS Adhesives 1

A62D - Chemical Means FOR Extinguishing Fires OR FOR Combating OR Protecting Against Harmful Chemical AGENTS; Chemical Materials FOR USE IN Breathing Apparatus 1

C08K - Use of inorganic or non-macromolecular organic substances as compounding ingredients 1

C09K - Materials FOR Miscellaneous Applications, NOT Provided FOR Elsewhere 1

C08L - Compositions OF Macromolecular Compounds 1

B64G - COSMONAUTICS; Vehicles OR Equipment Therefor 1

C12Q - Measuring OR Testing Processes Involving Enzymes, Nucleic Acids OR Microorganisms ; Compositions OR Test Papers THEREFOR; Processes OF Preparing Such COMPOSITIONS; Condition-responsive Control IN Microbiological OR Enzymological Processes 1

G01N - Investigating OR Analysing Materials BY Determining Their Chemical OR Physical Properties 1

F42B - Explosive Charges, e.g. FOR Blasting, Fireworks, Ammunition 1

Top 14 of 14 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

Reactive Surfaces Ltd., LLP's patent record in context - here's where to go next.

Reactive Surfaces Ltd., LLP's lead technology class is C09D (Coating Compositions, e.g. Paints, Varnishes OR LACQUERS; Filling PASTES; Chemical Paint OR INK REMOVERS; INKS; Correcting FLUIDS; WOODSTAINS; Pastes OR Solids FOR Colouring OR PRINTING; USE OF Materi), 91.7% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore C09D
Ranked #23,274 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare Reactive Surfaces Ltd., LLP against Ransburg Industrial Finishing K.K., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 49.2/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent, US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.