Where does Red Bank Technologies LLC rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), Red Bank Technologies LLC ranks #23,277 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does Red Bank Technologies LLC hold?

Red Bank Technologies LLC holds 12 US utility patents granted between 2020 and 2025, spanning 6 technology areas.

What is Red Bank Technologies LLC's Innovation Score?

Red Bank Technologies LLC has an Innovation Score of 45.9 out of 100 (top 22% of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

What technology areas does Red Bank Technologies LLC focus on?

Red Bank Technologies LLC's top technology area is H10K (Organic Electric Solid-state Devices) with 12 patents, ranking #182 of 791 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 6 CPC subclasses total.

Is Red Bank Technologies LLC's patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

Insufficient historical data is available to calculate a velocity trend for Red Bank Technologies LLC.

What does claim depth mean for Red Bank Technologies LLC's patents?

Red Bank Technologies LLC's patents average 13.9 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the Red Bank Technologies LLC patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView US Corporation

Red Bank Technologies LLC

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 12 granted patents across 6 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2020–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: H10K (Organic Electric Solid-state Devices).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Red ranks #23,277 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 12 patents across 6 technology areas.

#23,277
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: Top 22%
by Innovation Score (45.9/100): 13.9
avg claims per patent

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R23277 · US Corporation #23,277 · 12 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-PAR · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-USCORP · SPAN-YRS · BOOK-RICH

GRANTS-MICRO 12 grants
MID-PACK #23,277/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH Reactive Surfaces LLP
CPC-NARROW H10K · 6 areas
INNOV-PAR 45.9/100
CLAIMS-RICH 13.9 claims/avg
TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
SPAN-YRS 2020–2025 · 6y
BOOK-RICH 9/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Reactive Surfaces Ltd., LLP (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Red’s 45.9 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 8.9 pts (19%) Velocity 20.0 pts (43%) Breadth 8.7 pts (19%) Claim depth 8.4 pts (18%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
Red Bank · this assignee

46
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows Red's Innovation Score is 45.9/100 (top 22% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Red?

Each dot is one of Red’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Red’s own 13.9 claims/patent is at or below the 19.3 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.

Red vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Red's grants concentrate

Red Bank Technologies LLC is a focused PatentsView assignee: 6 CPC subclasses with 100% of grants classified under H10K (Organic Electric Solid-state Devices). Peak complete grant year is 2022 (4 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2020. By volume, Red sits between ReFlow Medical, Inc. and Response Technologies, LLC.

Red's three-year grant acceleration

Red Bank Technologies LLC shows 6 grants in 2022–2024 against only 2 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.

Reflow Medical

12
Remynd

12
Reactive Surfaces…

12
Real Innovations…

12
Rescale

12
Research Now Group

12
Respira Therapeut…

12
Response

12
Red Bank ◀

12

What this shows Red holds 12 patents at rank #23,293, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near Red

By rank, the assignees closest to #23,293 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in H10K (Organic Electric Solid-state Devices)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Red's primary technology class.

Red's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

46 Top 22% higher than 78% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2020–2025

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2020–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

Red Bank Technologies LLC patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2020	1	8.3%
2021	1	8.3%
2022	4	33.3%
2023	1	8.3%
2024	1	8.3%
2025partial year	4	33.3%

Which technologies does Red Bank Technologies LLC patent most?

H10K - Organic Electric Solid-state Devices 12

G02B - Optical Elements, Systems OR Apparatus 6

C09K - Materials FOR Miscellaneous Applications, NOT Provided FOR Elsewhere 5

C30B - Single-crystal Growth ; Unidirectional Solidification OF Eutectic Material OR Unidirectional Demixing OF Eutectoid MATERIAL; Refining BY Zone-melting OF Material ; Production OF A Homogeneous Polycrystalline Material With Defined Structure ; Single Crystals OR Homogeneous Polycrystalline Material WI 4

G02F - Optical Devices OR Arrangements FOR THE Control OF Light BY Modification OF THE Optical Properties OF THE Media OF THE Elements Involved THEREIN; Non-linear OPTICS; Frequency-changing OF LIGHT; Optical Logic ELEMENTS; Optical ANALOGUE/DIGITAL Converters 3

H01J - Electric Discharge Tubes OR Discharge Lamps 1

Top 6 of 6 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

Red Bank Technologies LLC's patent record in context - here's where to go next.

Red Bank Technologies LLC's lead technology class is H10K (Organic Electric Solid-state Devices), 100% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore H10K
Ranked #23,277 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare Red Bank Technologies LLC against ReFlow Medical, Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 45.9/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent, US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.