Overall rank by patents
#60
Across all tracked assignees
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 5,993 granted patents across 360 technology areas, active 2015–2025. Filing-trend and competitive-moat analysis cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search. Primary class: G02B (OPTICAL ELEMENTS, SYSTEMS OR APPARATUS).
The verdict
3M holds 5,993 US patents across 360 technology areas, rank #60 of 50,000 tracked assignees.
3M Innovative Properties Company has been granted 5,993 US utility patents between 2015 and 2025, placing 3M Innovative Properties Company at rank #60 across all assignees tracked by PlainPatent. This portfolio spans 360 distinct Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) subclasses, averaging 14.3 claims per patent with primary concentration in G02B (OPTICAL ELEMENTS, SYSTEMS OR APPARATUS). As a US Corporation, 3M Innovative Properties Company is one of the broader-portfolio assignees in the PatentsView dataset. By volume, 3M sits between LG CHEM, Ltd. (6,727 patents, rank #56) and SAP SE (5,717 patents, rank #64) - the closest US assignees by grant volume. The composite Innovation Score of 68.3/100 blends portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth into a single comparable measure drawn directly from USPTO PatentsView records.
Filing cadence tells the strategic story. Between 2020 and 2025 the company received 2,796 grants, compared with 3,197 in the 2015–2019 window, a -13% shift in five-year velocity. A cooling filing rate may reflect portfolio consolidation, shifting priorities, or reduced R&D throughput. The US Corporation classification further shapes interpretation, since corporate, government, and individual filers pursue patents for materially different reasons.
Claim depth and technology breadth together indicate competitive posture. 3M Innovative Properties Company's 14.3 average claims per patent sits within the typical range for solid legal coverage without excessive prosecution cost, while a diversified footprint across 100+ CPC subclasses spreads risk across many technology fronts. Combined with portfolio volume, these signals let analysts, investors, and licensing professionals benchmark 3M Innovative Properties Company against peers pursuing similar technology classes.
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
LG CHEM, LTD.
6,727 patents
Covidien LP
6,485 patents
The Regents of the University of California
6,428 patents
SAUDI ARABIAN OIL COMPANY
6,393 patents
3M INNOVATIVE PROPERTIES COMPANY
5,993 patents
CAPITAL ONE SERVICES, LLC
5,990 patents
Infineon Technologies AG
5,936 patents
HITACHI, LTD.
5,890 patents
SAP SE
5,717 patents
What this shows 3M holds 5,993 patents at rank #60, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
By rank, the assignees closest to #60 in granted patent volume.
Other assignees with the most granted patents in 3M's primary technology class.
3M's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
68 Top 1% higher than 99% of 50,000 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 561 | 9.4% |
| 2016 | 631 | 10.5% |
| 2017 | 673 | 11.2% |
| 2018 | 657 | 11.0% |
| 2019 | 675 | 11.3% |
| 2020 | 669 | 11.2% |
| 2021 | 526 | 8.8% |
| 2022 | 470 | 7.8% |
| 2023 | 396 | 6.6% |
| 2024 | 434 | 7.2% |
| 2025 | 301 | 5.0% |
Top 15 of 360 technology areas
Overall rank by patents
#60
Across all tracked assignees
68.3 out of 100
How to use this portfolio
3M's 5,993 grants land it in the top 1% by Innovation Score, but volume alone doesn't tell you where the strength sits.
Patent counts and the Innovation Score measure patenting activity, not commercial success or the legal strength of any patent. Many patents are filed defensively. Verify the status of an individual patent against official USPTO records.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.