Where does CrossBar, Inc. rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), CrossBar, Inc. ranks #2,013 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does CrossBar, Inc. hold?

CrossBar, Inc. holds 198 US utility patents granted between 2015 and 2025, spanning 16 technology areas.

What is CrossBar, Inc.'s Innovation Score?

CrossBar, Inc. has an Innovation Score of 50.2 out of 100 (top 13% of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

What technology areas does CrossBar, Inc. focus on?

CrossBar, Inc.'s top technology area is G11C (Static Stores) with 122 patents, ranking #50 of 882 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 16 CPC subclasses total.

Is CrossBar, Inc.'s patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

CrossBar, Inc.'s recent grant velocity is -65% compared to the prior five-year period (grant years, not application filing dates). Grant activity has slowed relative to earlier years.

What does claim depth mean for CrossBar, Inc.'s patents?

CrossBar, Inc.'s patents average 20.6 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the CrossBar, Inc. patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView US Corporation

CrossBar, Inc.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 198 granted patents across 16 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: G11C (Static Stores).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Crossbar ranks #2,013 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 198 patents across 16 technology areas.

#2,013
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: Top 13%
by Innovation Score (50.2/100): 20.6
avg claims per patent: -65%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R2013 · US Corporation #2,013 · 198 grants

GRANTS-MID · TOP-DECILE · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-FOCUS · INNOV-PAR · CLAIMS-DENSE · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL

GRANTS-MID 198 grants
TOP-DECILE #2,013/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH Lagree
CPC-FOCUS G11C · 16 areas
INNOV-PAR 50.2/100
CLAIMS-DENSE 20.6 claims/avg
TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
VEL-DROP -65% vel
BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Lagree Technologies, Inc. (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Crossbar’s 50.2 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 18.3 pts (36%) Velocity 5.4 pts (11%) Breadth 14.1 pts (28%) Claim depth 12.4 pts (25%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
Beijing Funate… · near

50
BI Incorporated · near

50
Casale · near

50
CrossBar · this assignee

50
Sanofi Pasteur · near

50
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows Crossbar's Innovation Score is 50.2/100 (top 13% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Crossbar?

Each dot is one of Crossbar’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Crossbar’s own 20.6 claims/patent is ABOVE the 14.0 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.

Crossbar vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Crossbar's grants concentrate

CrossBar, Inc. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 16 CPC subclasses with 61.6% of grants classified under G11C (Static Stores). Peak complete grant year is 2017 (43 grants) versus a trough of 6 in 2023. By volume, Crossbar sits between Kraft Foods Group Brands LLC and Saint-gobain Abrasives, Inc..

Crossbar's three-year grant acceleration

From 2019–2021 to 2022–2024, CrossBar, Inc. moved from 38 to 31 grants (0.82x the prior three-year total, a multiple, not a CAGR). Among 3,296 tracked assignees with ≥100 grants and ≥20 prior-period grants, that multiple ranks #1,784. See the growth leaderboard.

Kraft Foods Group…

199
Nippon Sheet Glass

199
Sorenson IP Holdi…

199
Valeo North Ameri…

199
Lagree

198
Ossur HF

198
Pacific Market In…

198
Saint-gobain Abra…

198
Crossbar ◀

198

What this shows CrossBar holds 198 patents at rank #2,013, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near CrossBar

By rank, the assignees closest to #2,013 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in G11C (Static Stores)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in CrossBar's primary technology class.

Assignees with similar portfolio profiles

Two PlainPatent-derived peer sets for CrossBar, neither rank-band nor same-CPC leaders (those blocks stay above). In G11C (Static Stores), CrossBar ranks #50 of 882 assignees by patent count in that subclass.

Similar innovation score

Nearest assignees by Innovation Score (50 here).

Casale SA 50 Sanofi Pasteur, Inc. 50 Beijing Funate Innovation Technology Co., Ltd. 50 BI Incorporated 50

Similar claim depth

Nearest assignees by average claims per patent (20.6 here).

Voxeljet AG 20.6 avg Content Square SAS 20.6 avg MS Technologies 20.6 avg Eagle Harbor Technologies, Inc. 20.6 avg

Crossbar's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

50 Top 13% higher than 87% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2015–2025

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

CrossBar, Inc. patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2015	35	17.7%
2016	27	13.6%
2017	43	21.7%
2018	17	8.6%
2019	19	9.6%
2020	12	6.1%
2021	7	3.5%
2022	11	5.6%
2023	6	3.0%
2024	14	7.1%
2025partial year	7	3.5%

Which technologies does CrossBar, Inc. patent most?

G11C - Static Stores 122

H10N - Electric Solid-state Devices NOT Otherwise Provided FOR 106

H10B - Electronic Memory Devices 88

G06F - Electric Digital Data Processing 29

H04L - Transmission OF Digital Information, e.g. Telegraphic Communication 15

H01L - Semiconductor Devices NOT Covered BY Class H10 12

H03K - Pulse Technique 12

H10D - Inorganic Electric Semiconductor Devices 9

H03M - CODING; DECODING; Code Conversion IN General 3

H05K - Printed CIRCUITS; Casings OR Constructional Details OF Electric APPARATUS; Manufacture OF Assemblages OF Electrical Components 2

G09C - Ciphering OR Deciphering Apparatus FOR Cryptographic OR Other Purposes Involving THE Need FOR Secrecy 2

Y10T - Technical Subjects Covered BY Former US Classification 2

Y02D - Climate Change Mitigation Technologies IN Information AND Communication Technologies [ICT], I.E. Information AND Communication Technologies Aiming AT THE Reduction OF Their OWN Energy USE 2

G06Q - Information AND Communication Technology [ICT] Specially Adapted FOR Administrative, Commercial, Financial, Managerial OR Supervisory PURPOSES; Systems OR Methods Specially Adapted FOR Administrative, Commercial, Financial, Managerial OR Supervisory Purposes, NOT Otherwise Provided FOR 1

G01R - Measuring Electric VARIABLES; Measuring Magnetic Variables 1

Top 15 of 16 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

CrossBar, Inc.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.

CrossBar, Inc.'s lead technology class is G11C (Static Stores), 61.6% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore G11C
Ranked #2,013 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare CrossBar, Inc. against Kraft Foods Group Brands LLC, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 50.2/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent , US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.