Where does Lagree Technologies, Inc. rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), Lagree Technologies, Inc. ranks #2,014 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does Lagree Technologies, Inc. hold?

Lagree Technologies, Inc. holds 198 US utility patents granted between 2016 and 2025, spanning 8 technology areas.

What is Lagree Technologies, Inc.'s Innovation Score?

Lagree Technologies, Inc. has an Innovation Score of 52.5 out of 100 (top 10% of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

Is Lagree Technologies, Inc.'s patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

Lagree Technologies, Inc.'s recent grant velocity is +108% compared to the prior five-year period (grant years, not application filing dates). This indicates accelerating grant output.

What does claim depth mean for Lagree Technologies, Inc.'s patents?

Lagree Technologies, Inc.'s patents average 21.8 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the Lagree Technologies, Inc. patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView Foreign Corporation

Lagree Technologies, Inc.

Q: What technology areas does Lagree Technologies, Inc. focus on?

Lagree Technologies, Inc.'s top technology area is A63B (Apparatus FOR Physical Training, Gymnastics, Swimming, Climbing, OR FENCING; Ball GAMES; Training Equipment) with 186 patents, ranking #10 of 1,021 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 8 CPC subclasses total.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 198 granted patents across 8 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2016–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: A63B (Apparatus FOR Physical Training, Gymnastics, Swimming, Climbing, OR FENCING; Ball GAMES; Training Equipment).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Lagree ranks #2,014 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 198 patents across 8 technology areas.

#2,014
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: Top 10%
by Innovation Score (52.5/100): 21.8
avg claims per patent: +108%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R2014 · Foreign Corporation #2,014 · 198 grants

GRANTS-MID · TOP-DECILE · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-PAR · CLAIMS-DENSE · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-SURGE · BOOK-FULL

GRANTS-MID 198 grants
TOP-DECILE #2,014/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH CrossBar
CPC-NARROW A63B · 8 areas
INNOV-PAR 52.5/100
CLAIMS-DENSE 21.8 claims/avg
TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
VEL-SURGE +108% vel
BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: CrossBar, Inc. (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Lagree’s 52.5 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 18.3 pts (35%) Velocity 11.1 pts (21%) Breadth 10.0 pts (19%) Claim depth 13.1 pts (25%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
Lagree · this assignee

52
Organovo · near

52
KOA · near

52
Tenstorrent · near

52
WhiteStar Communicat… · near

52
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows Lagree's Innovation Score is 52.5/100 (top 10% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Lagree?

Each dot is one of Lagree’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Lagree’s own 21.8 claims/patent is ABOVE the 14.0 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.

Lagree vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Lagree's grants concentrate

Lagree Technologies, Inc. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 8 CPC subclasses with 93.9% of grants classified under A63B (Apparatus FOR Physical Training, Gymnastics, Swimming, Climbing, OR FENCING; Ball GAMES; Training Equipment). Peak complete grant year is 2022 (35 grants) versus a trough of 2 in 2016. By volume, Lagree sits between Nippon Sheet Glass Company, Limited and Suntory Holdings Limited.

Lagree's three-year grant acceleration

From 2019–2021 to 2022–2024, Lagree Technologies, Inc. moved from 54 to 90 grants (1.67x the prior three-year total, a multiple, not a CAGR). Among 3,296 tracked assignees with ≥100 grants and ≥20 prior-period grants, that multiple ranks #330. See the growth leaderboard.

Nippon Sheet Glass

199
Sorenson IP Holdi…

199
Valeo North Ameri…

199
Crossbar

198
Ossur HF

198
Pacific Market In…

198
Saint-gobain Abra…

198
Suntory Holdings

198
Lagree ◀

198

What this shows Lagree holds 198 patents at rank #2,014, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near Lagree

By rank, the assignees closest to #2,014 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in A63B (Apparatus FOR Physical Training)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Lagree's primary technology class.

Assignees with similar portfolio profiles

Two PlainPatent-derived peer sets for Lagree, neither rank-band nor same-CPC leaders (those blocks stay above). In A63B (Apparatus FOR Physical Training), Lagree ranks #10 of 1,021 assignees by patent count in that subclass.

Similar innovation score

Nearest assignees by Innovation Score (52 here).

Organovo, Inc. 52 KOA Corporation 52 WhiteStar Communications, Inc. 52 Tenstorrent Inc. 52

Similar claim depth

Nearest assignees by average claims per patent (21.8 here).

Skyhook Wireless, Inc. 21.8 avg Luxtera, Inc. 21.8 avg TRON—Translationale Onkologie an der Universitätsmedizin der Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz 21.8 avg Carl Zeiss SMT GmbH 21.8 avg

Lagree's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

52 Top 10% higher than 90% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2016–2025

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2016–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

Lagree Technologies, Inc. patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2016	2	1.0%
2017	24	12.1%
2018	21	10.6%
2019	15	7.6%
2020	20	10.1%
2021	19	9.6%
2022	35	17.7%
2023	33	16.7%
2024	22	11.1%
2025partial year	7	3.5%

Which technologies does Lagree Technologies, Inc. patent most?

A63B - Apparatus FOR Physical Training, Gymnastics, Swimming, Climbing, OR FENCING; Ball GAMES; Training Equipment 186

A61B - DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; Identification 12

G09B - Educational OR Demonstration APPLIANCES; Appliances FOR Teaching, OR Communicating With, THE Blind, Deaf OR MUTE; MODELS; PLANETARIA; GLOBES; MAPS; Diagrams 11

G16H - Healthcare Informatics, i.e. Information AND Communication Technology [ICT] Specially Adapted FOR THE Handling OR Processing OF Medical OR Healthcare Data 8

G06Q - Information AND Communication Technology [ICT] Specially Adapted FOR Administrative, Commercial, Financial, Managerial OR Supervisory PURPOSES; Systems OR Methods Specially Adapted FOR Administrative, Commercial, Financial, Managerial OR Supervisory Purposes, NOT Otherwise Provided FOR 6

H02J - Circuit Arrangements OR Systems FOR Supplying OR Distributing Electric POWER; Systems FOR Storing Electric Energy 2

H04M - Telephonic Communication 2

A61H - Physical Therapy Apparatus, e.g. Devices FOR Locating OR Stimulating Reflex Points IN THE BODY; Artificial RESPIRATION; MASSAGE; Bathing Devices FOR Special Therapeutic OR Hygienic Purposes OR Specific Parts OF THE Body 1

Top 8 of 8 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

Lagree Technologies, Inc.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.

Lagree Technologies, Inc.'s lead technology class is A63B (Apparatus FOR Physical Training, Gymnastics, Swimming, Climbing, OR FENCING; Ball GAMES; Training Equipment), 93.9% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore A63B
Ranked #2,014 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare Lagree Technologies, Inc. against Nippon Sheet Glass Company, Limited, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 52.5/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent , US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.