CPC technology class · H10
H10D - Inorganic Electric Semiconductor Devices
Inorganic electric semiconductor devices. 96,746 US utility patents granted 2015–2025, with the leading assignees and year-by-year grant trajectory.
- 96,746
- US patents granted
- #1/5
- in H10
- 42.5%
- H10 class share
- -17%
- 5-yr velocity
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Inorganic Electric Semiconductor Devices ranks #16 of 670 CPC technology areas - 96,746 US patents granted since 2015, with recorded grant volume down 17% over five years.
- #16
- of 670 CPC technology areas
- 96,746
- US patents granted, 2015–2025
- Taiwan Semiconductor…
- leading assignee (13,882)
- -17%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
How H10D's grant cadence moved
Between 2020–2024, H10D recorded 38,679 grants versus 46,577 in 2015–2019 (-17% equal-window velocity). Across complete years, output peaked in 2017 at 9,780 grants and bottomed in 2023 at 7,037 (+39% peak-over-trough). Lead assignee Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Ltd. holds 14.3% of the class ; the top three share 29.2%.
Leaderboard read
H10D concentration, lead at 14.3%
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Ltd. leads this historical grant record at 14.3% of H10D - foreign corporation assignees hold 72% of class grants (64,857 of 89,589). Figures describe granted US utility patents in this CPC subclass, not current investment or legal strength.
- Leader's share
- 14.3%
- Top three share
- 29.2%
- Lead over #2
- 5,729
13,882 of 96,746 grants
of the class's recorded grants
more grants than Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
Where H10D sits inside H10
Among 5 subclasses in H10 (Semiconductor DEVICES; Electric Solid-state Devices NOT Otherwise Provided FOR), H10D ranks #1 and holds 42.5% of the parent class's 227,396 recorded grants. Sibling chips below are the other subclasses in the same parent class, not the nationwide volume/lead-share peers further down.
Rising assignees active in H10D
Company-wide grant multiples (2022–2024 vs 2019–2021) among assignees with ≥5 patents in this subclass. Growth is company-wide; class patent counts are subclass-specific.
- #1 Sharp Display Technology Corporation 144x 0 → 144 company-wide · 25 in H10D
- #2 Wuhan Tianma Microelectronics Co., Ltd. Shanghai Branch 142x 0 → 142 company-wide · 13 in H10D
- #3 Hitachi Energy Ltd 120x 0 → 120 company-wide · 15 in H10D
- #4 Kyocera AVX Components Corporation 100x 1 → 100 company-wide · 10 in H10D
- #5 Adeia Semiconductor Bonding Technologies Inc. 90x 0 → 90 company-wide · 17 in H10D
H10D grants by year, peak 2017 (9,780)
US utility-patent grants per year in H10D, 2015–2025 - recent five years are down 17% versus 2015–2019.
Who leads H10D?
The 12 most active assignees in Inorganic Electric Semiconductor Devices - wider bars mean more grants
- Taiwan Semiconductor…
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Ltd.
13,882 patents
- Samsung
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
8,153 patents
- International…
International Business Machines Corporation
6,204 patents
- Semiconductor Energy… 4,393
Semiconductor Energy Laboratory Co., Ltd.
4,393 patents
- Boe Technology Group 2,873
BOE Technology Group Co., Ltd.
2,873 patents
- Globalfoundries 2,698
GlobalFoundries Inc.
2,698 patents
- United Microelectronic… 2,180
United Microelectronics Corp.
2,180 patents
- Intel 2,174
Intel Corporation
2,174 patents
- Micron Technology 1,804
Micron Technology, Inc.
1,804 patents
- Toshiba 1,449
Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba
1,449 patents
- Renesas 1,328
Renesas Electronics Corporation
1,328 patents
- Sk hynix 1,205
SK hynix Inc.
1,205 patents
What this shows Taiwan Semiconductor… is the most active filer in H10D, holding 13,882 of the 96,746 patents in this class. Concentration at the top signals how contestable this technology area is for new entrants.
View data table
| Rank | Company | Patents in H10D |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Ltd. | 13,882 |
| #2 | Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. | 8,153 |
| #3 | International Business Machines Corporation | 6,204 |
| #4 | Semiconductor Energy Laboratory Co., Ltd. | 4,393 |
| #5 | BOE Technology Group Co., Ltd. | 2,873 |
| #6 | GlobalFoundries Inc. | 2,698 |
| #7 | United Microelectronics Corp. | 2,180 |
| #8 | Intel Corporation | 2,174 |
| #9 | Micron Technology, Inc. | 1,804 |
| #10 | Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba | 1,449 |
| #11 | Renesas Electronics Corporation | 1,328 |
| #12 | SK hynix Inc. | 1,205 |
| #13 | Infineon Technologies AG | 1,166 |
| #14 | Texas Instruments Incorporated | 1,129 |
| #15 | Fuji Electric Co., Ltd. | 1,126 |
| #16 | LG Display Co., Ltd. | 1,029 |
| #17 | Semiconductor Manufacturing International (Shanghai) Corporation | 884 |
| #18 | Japan Display Inc. | 801 |
| #19 | Mitsubishi Electric Corporation | 737 |
| #20 | Infineon Technologies Austria AG | 711 |
Footprint here vs. claim strategy
Each dot is a leading H10D assignee, placed by how many patents it holds in this class (horizontal) against its company-wide average claims per patent (vertical) - a read on whether the class is led by broad-but-shallow filers or focused deep-claim players.
Classes near H10D's 96,746-grant footprint
Nationwide nearest neighbors for H10D (#16 of 670 by volume ; lead share 14.3%) - not the H10 parent-class siblings above.
Nearest by grant volume
Nearest by lead-assignee share
Questions about H10D
Which company holds the most patents in H10D?
Which H10D assignees grew fastest recently?
How does H10D compare inside parent class H10?
What to do with this data
H10D in context - here's where to go next.
- Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Ltd. leads H10D with 13,882 grants in this class. See full portfolio
- H10D ranks #16 of 670 by grant volume among all tracked CPC technology areas. See the ranking
- Inside parent class H10, the largest sibling subclass is H10K with 50,923 grants. Explore H10K
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through 2026-05-15; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Methodology - H10D figures are USPTO PatentsView granted-utility totals for this subclass (96,746 grants in the tracked window).
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.