Overall rank by patents
#6,123
Across all tracked assignees
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 55 granted patents across 20 technology areas, active 2015–2024. Filing-trend and competitive-moat analysis cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search. Primary class: G11C (STATIC STORES).
The verdict
Crocus holds 55 US patents across 20 technology areas, rank #6,123 of 50,000 tracked assignees.
Crocus Technology Sa has been granted 55 US utility patents between 2015 and 2024, placing Crocus Technology Sa at rank #6,123 across all assignees tracked by PlainPatent. This portfolio spans 20 distinct Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) subclasses, averaging 11.9 claims per patent with primary concentration in G11C (STATIC STORES). As a Foreign Corporation, Crocus Technology Sa is one of the more focused assignees in the PatentsView dataset. By volume, Crocus sits between Cambridge Silicon Radio Limited (55 patents, rank #6,119) and China Agricultural University (55 patents, rank #6,127) - the closest US assignees by grant volume. The composite Innovation Score of 44.7/100 blends portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth into a single comparable measure drawn directly from USPTO PatentsView records.
Filing cadence tells the strategic story. Between 2020 and 2025 the company received 9 grants, compared with 46 in the 2015–2019 window, a -80% shift in five-year velocity. A cooling filing rate may reflect portfolio consolidation, shifting priorities, or reduced R&D throughput. The Foreign Corporation classification further shapes interpretation, since corporate, government, and individual filers pursue patents for materially different reasons.
Claim depth and technology breadth together indicate competitive posture. Crocus Technology Sa's 11.9 average claims per patent suggests focused, narrowly drawn claims typical of single-invention filings, while a multi-domain presence across 20 subclasses balances depth with breadth. Combined with portfolio volume, these signals let analysts, investors, and licensing professionals benchmark Crocus Technology Sa against peers pursuing similar technology classes.
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
CAMBRIDGE SILICON RADIO LIMITED
55 patents
CHAPIN MANUFACTURING, INC.
55 patents
CHINA TOBACCO HUNAN INDUSTRIAL CO., LTD.
55 patents
CHINA TOBACCO YUNNAN INDUSTRIAL CO., LTD.
55 patents
CaaStle, Inc
55 patents
Cardinal IG Company
55 patents
Caterpillar Trimble Control Technologies LLC
55 patents
China Agricultural University
55 patents
CROCUS TECHNOLOGY SA
55 patents
What this shows Crocus holds 55 patents at rank #6,123, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
By rank, the assignees closest to #6,123 in granted patent volume.
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Crocus's primary technology class.
Crocus's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
45 Top 25% higher than 75% of 50,000 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 6 | 10.9% |
| 2016 | 11 | 20.0% |
| 2017 | 11 | 20.0% |
| 2018 | 14 | 25.5% |
| 2019 | 4 | 7.3% |
| 2020 | 1 | 1.8% |
| 2021 | 1 | 1.8% |
| 2022 | 2 | 3.6% |
| 2023 | 2 | 3.6% |
| 2024 | 3 | 5.5% |
Top 15 of 20 technology areas
Overall rank by patents
#6,123
Across all tracked assignees
44.7 out of 100
How to use this portfolio
Crocus's 55 grants land it in the top 25% by Innovation Score, but volume alone doesn't tell you where the strength sits.
Patent counts and the Innovation Score measure patenting activity, not commercial success or the legal strength of any patent. Many patents are filed defensively. Verify the status of an individual patent against official USPTO records.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.