CPC technology class · G06
G06G - Analogue Computers
Analogue computers. 675 US utility patents granted 2015–2025, with the leading assignees and year-by-year filing trajectory.
- 675
- US patents granted
- G06
- Parent CPC class
- 20
- Active assignees
- -24%
- 5-yr velocity
The verdict
Analogue Computers ranks #507 of 670 CPC technology areas - 675 US patents granted since 2015, with filing down 24% over five years.
- #507
- of 670 CPC technology areas
- 675
- US patents granted, 2015–2025
- Z124
- leading assignee (82)
- -24%
- filing velocity, last 5 yrs
CPC subclass G06G - ANALOGUE COMPUTERS - covers 675 US utility patents granted between 2015 and 2025 according to USPTO PatentsView records, within the broader CPC class G06 (COMPUTING OR CALCULATING; COUNTING). See our CPC classification guide for how the system works.
The competitive landscape in G06G is shaped by 20 distinct companies actively filing in this space. Z124 leads with 82 patents, followed by Heartflow, Inc. at 50 grants and Ceremorphic, Inc. at 7.
Filing activity in G06G is down 24% over the past five years versus 2015-2019, a notable slowdown that may signal a maturing field. All counts come directly from USPTO PatentsView and reflect US granted utility patents only.
Is G06G innovation accelerating?
US utility-patent grants per year in G06G, 2015–2025 - recent five years are down 24% versus 2015–2019.
Who leads G06G?
The 12 most active assignees in ANALOGUE COMPUTERS - wider bars mean more grants
- Z124
Z124
82 patents
- Heartflow
Heartflow, Inc.
50 patents
- Ceremorphic 7
Ceremorphic, Inc.
7 patents
- Xslent Energy 6
XSLENT ENERGY TECHNOLOGIES, LLC
6 patents
- Eagle Harbor 4
Eagle Harbor Technologies, Inc.
4 patents
- Sendyne 4
Sendyne Corporation
4 patents
- Apparent Labs 4
Apparent Labs, LLC
4 patents
- Landmark Graphics 3
Landmark Graphics Corporation
3 patents
- The Mathworks 3
The MathWorks, Inc.
3 patents
- Resonant 3
Resonant Inc.
3 patents
- Rain Neuromorphics 3
Rain Neuromorphics Inc.
3 patents
- Montres Breguet 2
Montres Breguet S.A.
2 patents
What this shows Z124 is the most active filer in G06G, holding 82 of the 675 patents in this class. Concentration at the top signals how contestable this technology area is for new entrants.
View data table
| Rank | Company | Patents in G06G |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | Z124 | 82 |
| #2 | Heartflow, Inc. | 50 |
| #3 | Ceremorphic, Inc. | 7 |
| #4 | Xslent Energy Technologies, Llc | 6 |
| #5 | Eagle Harbor Technologies, Inc. | 4 |
| #6 | Sendyne Corporation | 4 |
| #7 | Apparent Labs, Llc | 4 |
| #8 | Landmark Graphics Corporation | 3 |
| #9 | The Mathworks, Inc. | 3 |
| #10 | Resonant Inc. | 3 |
| #11 | Rain Neuromorphics Inc. | 3 |
| #12 | Montres Breguet S.a. | 2 |
| #13 | Pixar | 2 |
| #14 | ETH Zürich (eidgenössische Technische Hochschule Zürich) | 2 |
| #15 | CAE Inc. | 2 |
| #16 | Microsemi Soc Corp. | 2 |
| #17 | Crocus Technology Sa | 2 |
| #18 | Geosat Aerospace & Technology Inc. | 2 |
| #19 | Dyno Nobel Inc. | 2 |
| #20 | Avatekh, Inc. | 2 |
About This Class
CPC subclass G06G belongs to class G06.
675 patents were granted in this class between 2015 and 2025.
20 companies actively patent in this space.
Classification System
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) is a hierarchical patent classification system used by the USPTO and EPO.
Footprint here vs. claim strategy
Each dot is a leading G06G assignee, placed by how many patents it holds in this class (horizontal) against its company-wide average claims per patent (vertical) - a read on whether the class is led by broad-but-shallow filers or focused deep-claim players.
Top 14 G06G assignees by class footprint. Bubble size = patents in G06G. Source: USPTO PatentsView (claim depth is company-wide across all classes).
Frequently Asked Questions
What is CPC class G06G?
How many patents have been filed in G06G?
Which company holds the most patents in G06G?
How is patent data for G06G collected?
What is the difference between CPC class and subclass?
Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.