CPC technology class · F42
F42C - Ammunition Fuzes
Ammunition fuzes ; arming or safety means therefor. 944 US utility patents granted 2015–2025, with the leading assignees and year-by-year grant trajectory.
- 944
- US patents granted
- #2/3
- in F42
- 16.9%
- F42 class share
- +2%
- 5-yr velocity
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Ammunition Fuzes ranks #467 of 670 CPC technology areas - 944 US patents granted since 2015, with recorded grant volume up 2% over five years.
- #467
- of 670 CPC technology areas
- 944
- US patents granted, 2015–2025
- True Velocity Ip Holdings
- leading assignee (117)
- +2%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
How F42C's grant cadence moved
Between 2020–2024, F42C recorded 448 grants versus 441 in 2015–2019 (+2% equal-window velocity). Across complete years, output peaked in 2021 at 112 grants and bottomed in 2024 at 70 (+60% peak-over-trough). Lead assignee True Velocity IP Holdings, Inc. holds 12.4% of the class ; the top three share 23.2%.
Leaderboard read
F42C concentration, lead at 12.4%
True Velocity IP Holdings, Inc. leads this historical grant record at 12.4% of F42C - us corporation assignees hold 61% of class grants (346 of 569). Figures describe granted US utility patents in this CPC subclass, not current investment or legal strength.
- Leader's share
- 12.4%
- Top three share
- 23.2%
- Lead over #2
- 65
117 of 944 grants
of the class's recorded grants
more grants than The United States of America as represented by the Secretary of the Army
Where F42C sits inside F42
Among 3 subclasses in F42 (AMMUNITION; Blasting), F42C ranks #2 and holds 16.9% of the parent class's 5,576 recorded grants. Sibling chips below are the other subclasses in the same parent class, not the nationwide volume/lead-share peers further down.
Rising assignees active in F42C
Company-wide grant multiples (2022–2024 vs 2019–2021) among assignees with ≥5 patents in this subclass. Growth is company-wide; class patent counts are subclass-specific.
- #1 Hanwha Corporation 6.25x 4 → 25 company-wide · 12 in F42C
- #2 Fike Corporation 4.00x 1 → 4 company-wide · 5 in F42C
- #3 DynaEnergetics Europe GmbH 2.19x 37 → 81 company-wide · 24 in F42C
- #4 Hunting Titan, Inc. 2.00x 24 → 48 company-wide · 14 in F42C
- #5 BAE Systems Bofors AB 1.78x 9 → 16 company-wide · 8 in F42C
F42C grants by year, peak 2021 (112)
US utility-patent grants per year in F42C, 2015–2025 - recent five years are up 2% versus 2015–2019.
Who leads F42C?
The 12 most active assignees in Ammunition Fuzes ; Arming OR Safety Means Therefor - wider bars mean more grants
- True Velocity Ip…
True Velocity IP Holdings, Inc.
117 patents
- The United States of…
The United States of America as represented by the Secretary of the Army
52 patents
- Omnitek Partners
Omnitek Partners LLC
50 patents
- True Velocity 25
True Velocity, Inc.
25 patents
- Dynaenergetics Europe 24
DynaEnergetics Europe GmbH
24 patents
- Detnet South Africa… 20
Detnet South Africa (PTY) Ltd
20 patents
- Rheinmetall Waffe… 15
Rheinmetall Waffe Munition GmbH
15 patents
- Hunting Titan 14
Hunting Titan, Inc.
14 patents
- Hanwha 12
Hanwha Corporation
12 patents
- Dynaenergetics & Kg 11
DynaEnergetics GmbH & Co. KG
11 patents
- Los Alamos National… 9
LOS Alamos National Security, LLC
9 patents
- Bae Systems Bofors Ab 8
BAE Systems Bofors AB
8 patents
What this shows True Velocity Ip… is the most active filer in F42C, holding 117 of the 944 patents in this class. Concentration at the top signals how contestable this technology area is for new entrants.
View data table
| Rank | Company | Patents in F42C |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | True Velocity IP Holdings, Inc. | 117 |
| #2 | The United States of America as represented by the Secretary of the Army | 52 |
| #3 | Omnitek Partners LLC | 50 |
| #4 | True Velocity, Inc. | 25 |
| #5 | DynaEnergetics Europe GmbH | 24 |
| #6 | Detnet South Africa (PTY) Ltd | 20 |
| #7 | Rheinmetall Waffe Munition GmbH | 15 |
| #8 | Hunting Titan, Inc. | 14 |
| #9 | Hanwha Corporation | 12 |
| #10 | DynaEnergetics GmbH & Co. KG | 11 |
| #11 | LOS Alamos National Security, LLC | 9 |
| #12 | BAE Systems Bofors AB | 8 |
| #13 | Saab AB | 7 |
| #14 | Geodynamics, Inc. | 7 |
| #15 | Orbital ATK, Inc. | 7 |
| #16 | Nexter Munitions | 7 |
| #17 | Nostromo Ltd. | 7 |
| #18 | Matrix X, LLC | 7 |
| #19 | PCP Tactical, LLC | 6 |
| #20 | TDW Gesellschaft für Verteidigungstechnische Wirksysteme mbH | 6 |
Footprint here vs. claim strategy
Each dot is a leading F42C assignee, placed by how many patents it holds in this class (horizontal) against its company-wide average claims per patent (vertical) - a read on whether the class is led by broad-but-shallow filers or focused deep-claim players.
Classes near F42C's 944-grant footprint
Nationwide nearest neighbors for F42C (#467 of 670 by volume ; lead share 12.4%) - not the F42 parent-class siblings above.
Nearest by lead-assignee share
Questions about F42C
Which company holds the most patents in F42C?
Which F42C assignees grew fastest recently?
How does F42C compare inside parent class F42?
What to do with this data
F42C in context - here's where to go next.
- True Velocity IP Holdings, Inc. leads F42C with 117 grants in this class. See full portfolio
- F42C ranks #467 of 670 by grant volume among all tracked CPC technology areas. See the ranking
- Inside parent class F42, the largest sibling subclass is F42B with 3,745 grants. Explore F42B
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through 2026-05-15; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Methodology - F42C figures are USPTO PatentsView granted-utility totals for this subclass (944 grants in the tracked window).
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.