Where does True Velocity IP Holdings, Inc. rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), True Velocity IP Holdings, Inc. ranks #2,033 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does True Velocity IP Holdings, Inc. hold?

True Velocity IP Holdings, Inc. holds 196 US utility patents granted between 2018 and 2025, spanning 11 technology areas.

What is True Velocity IP Holdings, Inc.'s Innovation Score?

True Velocity IP Holdings, Inc. has an Innovation Score of 40.1 out of 100 (top 36% of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

What technology areas does True Velocity IP Holdings, Inc. focus on?

True Velocity IP Holdings, Inc.'s top technology area is F42B (Explosive Charges, e.g. FOR Blasting, Fireworks, Ammunition) with 146 patents, ranking #3 of 331 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 11 CPC subclasses total.

Is True Velocity IP Holdings, Inc.'s patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

True Velocity IP Holdings, Inc.'s recent grant velocity is +433% compared to the prior five-year period (grant years, not application filing dates). This indicates accelerating grant output.

What does claim depth mean for True Velocity IP Holdings, Inc.'s patents?

True Velocity IP Holdings, Inc.'s patents average 12.3 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the True Velocity IP Holdings, Inc. patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView US Corporation

True Velocity IP Holdings, Inc.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 196 granted patents across 11 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2018–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: F42B (Explosive Charges, e.g. FOR Blasting, Fireworks, Ammunition).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, True ranks #2,033 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 196 patents across 11 technology areas.

#2,033
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: Top 36%
by Innovation Score (40.1/100): 12.3
avg claims per patent: +433%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R2033 · US Corporation #2,033 · 196 grants

GRANTS-MID · TOP-DECILE · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-FOCUS · INNOV-PAR · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-SURGE · BOOK-FULL

GRANTS-MID 196 grants
TOP-DECILE #2,033/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH Biomet Sports Medicine
CPC-FOCUS F42B · 11 areas
INNOV-PAR 40.1/100
CLAIMS-RICH 12.3 claims/avg
TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
VEL-SURGE +433% vel
BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Biomet Sports Medicine, LLC (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How True’s 40.1 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 18.3 pts (46%) Velocity 2.7 pts (7%) Breadth 11.7 pts (29%) Claim depth 7.4 pts (18%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
M-I Drilling Fluids UK · near

40
Compass Therapeutics · near

40
M&R Printing Equipment · near

40
True Velocity IP… · this assignee

40
Envision Aesc Japan · near

40
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows True's Innovation Score is 40.1/100 (top 36% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for True?

Each dot is one of True’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). True’s own 12.3 claims/patent is at or below the 13.3 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.

True vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where True's grants concentrate

True Velocity IP Holdings, Inc. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 11 CPC subclasses with 74.5% of grants classified under F42B (Explosive Charges, e.g. FOR Blasting, Fireworks, Ammunition). Peak complete grant year is 2020 (68 grants) versus a trough of 5 in 2018. By volume, True sits between Biomet Sports Medicine, LLC and Med-el Elektromedizinische Geraete GmbH.

True's three-year grant acceleration

From 2019–2021 to 2022–2024, True Velocity IP Holdings, Inc. moved from 131 to 54 grants (0.41x the prior three-year total, a multiple, not a CAGR). Among 3,296 tracked assignees with ≥100 grants and ≥20 prior-period grants, that multiple ranks #2,861. See the growth leaderboard.

Biomet Sports Med…

196
Nektar Therapeuti…

196
Olympus Winter &…

196
Specialized Bicyc…

196
True Velocity IP… ◀

196
China Mobile Comm…

195
Coway

195
Iscar

195
Med-el Elektromed…

195

What this shows True holds 196 patents at rank #2,033, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near True

By rank, the assignees closest to #2,033 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in F42B (Explosive Charges)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in True's primary technology class.

Assignees with similar portfolio profiles

Two PlainPatent-derived peer sets for True, neither rank-band nor same-CPC leaders (those blocks stay above). In F42B (Explosive Charges), True ranks #3 of 331 assignees by patent count in that subclass.

Similar innovation score

Nearest assignees by Innovation Score (40 here).

Compass Therapeutics LLC 40 M&R Printing Equipment, Inc. 40 Envision Aesc Japan Ltd. 40 M-I Drilling Fluids UK Limited 40

Similar claim depth

Nearest assignees by average claims per patent (12.3 here).

Nissan Chemical Corporation 12.3 avg Southco, Inc. 12.3 avg United Microelectronics Corp. 12.3 avg Traeger Pellet Grills, LLC 12.3 avg

True's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

40 Top 36% higher than 64% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2018–2025

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2018–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

True Velocity IP Holdings, Inc. patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2018	5	2.6%
2019	25	12.8%
2020	68	34.7%
2021	38	19.4%
2022	31	15.8%
2023	15	7.7%
2024	8	4.1%
2025partial year	6	3.1%

Which technologies does True Velocity IP Holdings, Inc. patent most?

F42B - Explosive Charges, e.g. FOR Blasting, Fireworks, Ammunition 146

F42C - Ammunition Fuzes ; Arming OR Safety Means Therefor 117

B22F - Working Metallic POWDER; Manufacture OF Articles From Metallic POWDER; Making Metallic Powder ; Apparatus OR Devices Specially Adapted FOR Metallic Powder 61

C22C - Alloys 60

C04B - Lime, MAGNESIA; SLAG; CEMENTS; Compositions Thereof, e.g. Mortars, Concrete OR Like Building MATERIALS; Artificial Stone ; Ceramics ; REFRACTORIES; Treatment OF Natural Stone 55

B29C - Shaping OR Joining OF PLASTICS; Shaping OF Material IN A Plastic State, NOT Otherwise Provided FOR; After-treatment OF THE Shaped Products, e.g. Repairing 6

F41A - Functional Features OR Details Common TO Both Smallarms AND Ordnance, e.g. CANNONS; Mountings FOR Smallarms OR Ordnance 4

B33Y - Additive Manufacturing, i.e. Manufacturing OF Three-dimensional [3-D] Objects BY Additive Deposition, Additive Agglomeration OR Additive Layering, e.g. BY 3-D Printing, Stereolithography OR Selective Laser Sintering 4

B29L - Indexing Scheme Associated With Subclass B29c, Relating TO Particular Articles 2

B29K - Indexing Scheme Associated With Subclasses B29b, B29c OR B29d, Relating TO Moulding Materials OR TO Materials FOR ; Moulds, ; Reinforcements, Fillers OR Preformed Parts, e.g. Inserts 1

G01L - Measuring Force, Stress, Torque, Work, Mechanical Power, Mechanical Efficiency, OR Fluid Pressure 1

Top 11 of 11 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

True Velocity IP Holdings, Inc.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.

True Velocity IP Holdings, Inc.'s lead technology class is F42B (Explosive Charges, e.g. FOR Blasting, Fireworks, Ammunition), 74.5% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore F42B
Ranked #2,033 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare True Velocity IP Holdings, Inc. against Biomet Sports Medicine, LLC, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 40.1/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent , US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.