CPC technology class · F42
F42D - Blasting
Blasting. 887 US utility patents granted 2015–2025, with the leading assignees and year-by-year filing trajectory.
- 887
- US patents granted
- F42
- Parent CPC class
- 20
- Active assignees
- +35%
- 5-yr velocity
The verdict
Blasting ranks #473 of 670 CPC technology areas - 887 US patents granted since 2015, with filing up 35% over five years.
- #473
- of 670 CPC technology areas
- 887
- US patents granted, 2015–2025
- Detnet South Africa (…
- leading assignee (53)
- +35%
- filing velocity, last 5 yrs
CPC subclass F42D - BLASTING - covers 887 US utility patents granted between 2015 and 2025 according to USPTO PatentsView records, within the broader CPC class F42 (AMMUNITION; BLASTING). See our CPC classification guide for how the system works.
The competitive landscape in F42D is shaped by 20 distinct companies actively filing in this space. Detnet South Africa (pty) Ltd leads with 53 patents, followed by Geodynamics, Inc. at 36 grants and Dynaenergetics Europe Gmbh at 33.
Filing activity in F42D is up 35% over the past five years versus 2015-2019, a sharp acceleration suggesting an emerging or fast-moving technology area. All counts come directly from USPTO PatentsView and reflect US granted utility patents only.
Is F42D innovation accelerating?
US utility-patent grants per year in F42D, 2015–2025 - recent five years are up 35% versus 2015–2019.
Who leads F42D?
The 12 most active assignees in BLASTING - wider bars mean more grants
- Detnet South Africa (…
DETNET SOUTH AFRICA (PTY) LTD
53 patents
- Geodynamics
GEODYNAMICS, INC.
36 patents
- Dynaenergetics Europe
DynaEnergetics Europe GmbH
33 patents
- Hunting Titan
Hunting Titan, Inc.
33 patents
- Hanwha
HANWHA CORPORATION
27 patents
- Orica International P… 19
Orica International Pte Ltd
19 patents
- Dyno Nobel 19
Dyno Nobel Inc.
19 patents
- Dynaenergetics & Kg 16
DynaEnergetics GmbH & Co. KG
16 patents
- Austin Star Detonator 11
Austin Star Detonator Company
11 patents
- G&H Diversified Manuf… 10
G&H Diversified Manufacturing LP
10 patents
- Los Alamos National S… 9
LOS ALAMOS NATIONAL SECURITY, LLC
9 patents
- Xconnect 9
XConnect, LLC
9 patents
What this shows Detnet South Africa (… is the most active filer in F42D, holding 53 of the 887 patents in this class. Concentration at the top signals how contestable this technology area is for new entrants.
View data table
| Rank | Company | Patents in F42D |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | Detnet South Africa (pty) Ltd | 53 |
| #2 | Geodynamics, Inc. | 36 |
| #3 | Dynaenergetics Europe Gmbh | 33 |
| #4 | Hunting Titan, Inc. | 33 |
| #5 | Hanwha Corporation | 27 |
| #6 | Orica International Pte Ltd | 19 |
| #7 | Dyno Nobel Inc. | 19 |
| #8 | Dynaenergetics Gmbh & Co. KG | 16 |
| #9 | Austin Star Detonator Company | 11 |
| #10 | G&H Diversified Manufacturing Lp | 10 |
| #11 | LOS Alamos National Security, Llc | 9 |
| #12 | Xconnect, Llc | 9 |
| #13 | Owen Oil Tools Lp | 7 |
| #14 | Ensign-bickford Aerospace & Defense Company | 7 |
| #15 | Petram Technologies, Inc. | 7 |
| #16 | Matrix X, Llc | 7 |
| #17 | Otto Torpedo Company | 7 |
| #18 | SWM International, Llc | 6 |
| #19 | Orica Explosives Technology PTY Ltd | 6 |
| #20 | Davey Bickford | 6 |
About This Class
CPC subclass F42D belongs to class F42.
887 patents were granted in this class between 2015 and 2025.
20 companies actively patent in this space.
Classification System
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) is a hierarchical patent classification system used by the USPTO and EPO.
Footprint here vs. claim strategy
Each dot is a leading F42D assignee, placed by how many patents it holds in this class (horizontal) against its company-wide average claims per patent (vertical) - a read on whether the class is led by broad-but-shallow filers or focused deep-claim players.
Top 14 F42D assignees by class footprint. Bubble size = patents in F42D. Source: USPTO PatentsView (claim depth is company-wide across all classes).
Frequently Asked Questions
What is CPC class F42D?
How many patents have been filed in F42D?
Which company holds the most patents in F42D?
How is patent data for F42D collected?
What is the difference between CPC class and subclass?
Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.