CPC technology class · A63
A63K - Racing
Racing; riding sports; equipment or accessories therefor. 80 US utility patents granted 2015–2025, with the leading assignees and year-by-year filing trajectory.
- 80
- US patents granted
- A63
- Parent CPC class
- 12
- Active assignees
- +44%
- 5-yr velocity
The verdict
Racing ranks #628 of 670 CPC technology areas - 80 US patents granted since 2015, with filing up 44% over five years.
- #628
- of 670 CPC technology areas
- 80
- US patents granted, 2015–2025
- Crystal Lagoons
- leading assignee (8)
- +44%
- filing velocity, last 5 yrs
CPC subclass A63K - RACING; RIDING SPORTS; EQUIPMENT OR ACCESSORIES THEREFOR - covers 80 US utility patents granted between 2015 and 2025 according to USPTO PatentsView records, within the broader CPC class A63 (SPORTS; GAMES; AMUSEMENTS). See our CPC classification guide for how the system works.
The competitive landscape in A63K is shaped by 12 distinct companies actively filing in this space. Crystal Lagoons Technologies, Inc. leads with 8 patents, followed by Swiss Timing Ltd at 6 grants and Everlast Climbing Industries, Inc. at 5.
Filing activity in A63K is up 44% over the past five years versus 2015-2019, a sharp acceleration suggesting an emerging or fast-moving technology area. All counts come directly from USPTO PatentsView and reflect US granted utility patents only.
Is A63K innovation accelerating?
US utility-patent grants per year in A63K, 2015–2025 - recent five years are up 44% versus 2015–2019.
Who leads A63K?
The 12 most active assignees in RACING; RIDING SPORTS; EQUIPMENT OR ACCESSORIES THEREFOR - wider bars mean more grants
- Crystal Lagoons
Crystal Lagoons Technologies, Inc.
8 patents
- Swiss Timing
Swiss Timing Ltd
6 patents
- Everlast Climbing Ind…
Everlast Climbing Industries, Inc.
5 patents
- Eco Sports Group
Eco Sports Group, Inc.
5 patents
- Litania Sports Group 3
Litania Sports Group, Inc.
3 patents
- Isolynx 2
Isolynx, LLC
2 patents
- Pro Performance Sports 2
PRO PERFORMANCE SPORTS, LLC
2 patents
- S R Smith 1
S.R. SMITH, LLC
1 patents
- Crystal Lagoons (Cura… 1
CRYSTAL LAGOONS (CURACAO) B.V.
1 patents
- Ars Electronica Linz… 1
ARS ELECTRONICA LINZ GMBH & CO. KG
1 patents
- Monolith 1
MONOLITH INC.
1 patents
- Quick Play Sport 1
QUICK PLAY SPORT LLC
1 patents
What this shows Crystal Lagoons is the most active filer in A63K, holding 8 of the 80 patents in this class. Concentration at the top signals how contestable this technology area is for new entrants.
View data table
| Rank | Company | Patents in A63K |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | Crystal Lagoons Technologies, Inc. | 8 |
| #2 | Swiss Timing Ltd | 6 |
| #3 | Everlast Climbing Industries, Inc. | 5 |
| #4 | Eco Sports Group, Inc. | 5 |
| #5 | Litania Sports Group, Inc. | 3 |
| #6 | Isolynx, Llc | 2 |
| #7 | PRO Performance Sports, Llc | 2 |
| #8 | S.r. Smith, Llc | 1 |
| #9 | Crystal Lagoons (curacao) B.v. | 1 |
| #10 | ARS Electronica LINZ Gmbh & Co. KG | 1 |
| #11 | Monolith Inc. | 1 |
| #12 | Quick PLAY Sport Llc | 1 |
About This Class
CPC subclass A63K belongs to class A63.
80 patents were granted in this class between 2015 and 2025.
12 companies actively patent in this space.
Classification System
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) is a hierarchical patent classification system used by the USPTO and EPO.
Footprint here vs. claim strategy
Each dot is a leading A63K assignee, placed by how many patents it holds in this class (horizontal) against its company-wide average claims per patent (vertical) - a read on whether the class is led by broad-but-shallow filers or focused deep-claim players.
Top 12 A63K assignees by class footprint. Bubble size = patents in A63K. Source: USPTO PatentsView (claim depth is company-wide across all classes).
Frequently Asked Questions
What is CPC class A63K?
How many patents have been filed in A63K?
Which company holds the most patents in A63K?
How is patent data for A63K collected?
What is the difference between CPC class and subclass?
Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.