CPC technology class · A63

A63C — Skates

Skates; skis; roller skates; design or layout of courts, rinks or the like. 1,092 US utility patents granted 2015–2025, with the leading assignees and year-by-year filing trajectory.

1,092
US patents granted
A63
Parent CPC class
20
Active assignees
-1%
5-yr velocity
Top assignee: Future Motion, Inc. (43 patents)

CPC subclass A63C — SKATES; SKIS; ROLLER SKATES; DESIGN OR LAYOUT OF COURTS, RINKS OR THE LIKE — covers 1,092 US utility patents granted between 2015 and 2025 according to USPTO PatentsView records. This subclass sits within the broader CPC class A63 (SPORTS; GAMES; AMUSEMENTS), one of roughly 250 top-level technology categories in the Cooperative Patent Classification system jointly maintained by the USPTO and the European Patent Office. At the subclass level, four-character codes like A63C give the most practical resolution for tracking a specific technology domain without losing sight of adjacent filings. Every grant here has been classified by a USPTO examiner based on the technical disclosure in the patent specification.

The competitive landscape in A63C is shaped by 20 distinct companies actively filing in this space. Future Motion, Inc. leads with 43 patents, followed by BAUER HOCKEY LLC at 179 grants and Salomon S.A.S. at 137. Concentration at the top of the leaderboard indicates whether this technology area is dominated by a handful of incumbents or fragmented across many filers — a useful signal for investors evaluating competitive moats and for product teams mapping freedom-to-operate risk.

Filing trajectory matters as much as static counts. The yearly series on this page plots grants from 2015 through 2025, highlighting whether innovation in A63C is accelerating, plateauing, or cooling. Technology areas with rising post-2020 activity often reflect emerging markets or new platform shifts, while declining filings can signal mature domains where incremental improvement has slowed. Researchers, licensing professionals, and competitive-intelligence teams use these patterns — together with the top-assignee distribution — to decide where to invest, where to license, and where to avoid entanglement. All counts on this page come directly from USPTO PatentsView and reflect US granted utility patents only.

Is A63C innovation accelerating?

US utility-patent grants per year in A63C, 2015–2025 — recent five years are down 1% versus 2015–2019.

406080100120140 20152016201720182019202020212022202320242025 56

Who leads A63C?

The 12 most active assignees in SKATES; SKIS; ROLLER SKATES; DESIGN OR LAYOUT OF COURTS, RINKS OR THE LIKE — wider bars mean more grants

patents

What this shows Future Motion is the most active filer in A63C, holding 43 of the 1,092 patents in this class. Concentration at the top signals how contestable this technology area is for new entrants.

Source USPTO PatentsView — granted utility patents As of 2015–2025 grant years
View data table

About This Class

CPC subclass A63C belongs to class A63.

1,092 patents were granted in this class between 2015 and 2025.

20 companies actively patent in this space.

Classification System

Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) is a hierarchical patent classification system used by the USPTO and EPO.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is CPC class A63C?
CPC subclass A63C covers SKATES; SKIS; ROLLER SKATES; DESIGN OR LAYOUT OF COURTS, RINKS OR THE LIKE. It belongs to CPC class A63 (SPORTS; GAMES; AMUSEMENTS). The Cooperative Patent Classification is a hierarchical system used by the USPTO and European Patent Office to categorize patents by technology.
How many patents have been filed in A63C?
1,092 US utility patents were granted in CPC subclass A63C between 2015 and 2025, based on USPTO PatentsView data.
Which company holds the most patents in A63C?
Future Motion, Inc. leads A63C with 43 patents, making it the most active assignee in this technology area.
How is patent data for A63C collected?
Patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. It covers all US granted utility patents and assigns CPC codes based on the technology described in each patent.
What is the difference between CPC class and subclass?
A CPC class (e.g., A63) is a broad technology category. Subclasses like A63C provide finer granularity within that category. PlainPatent organizes data at the subclass level (4-character codes) for the most useful view of technology domains.

Learn More

Explore the patent dataset

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView — official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent Editorial