CPC technology class · A63
A63C - Skates
Skates; skis; roller skates; design or layout of courts, rinks or the like. 1,092 US utility patents granted 2015–2025, with the leading assignees and year-by-year filing trajectory.
- 1,092
- US patents granted
- A63
- Parent CPC class
- 20
- Active assignees
- -1%
- 5-yr velocity
The verdict
Skates ranks #443 of 670 CPC technology areas - 1,092 US patents granted since 2015, with filing down 1% over five years.
- #443
- of 670 CPC technology areas
- 1,092
- US patents granted, 2015–2025
- Future Motion
- leading assignee (43)
- -1%
- filing velocity, last 5 yrs
CPC subclass A63C - SKATES; SKIS; ROLLER SKATES; DESIGN OR LAYOUT OF COURTS, RINKS OR THE LIKE - covers 1,092 US utility patents granted between 2015 and 2025 according to USPTO PatentsView records, within the broader CPC class A63 (SPORTS; GAMES; AMUSEMENTS). See our CPC classification guide for how the system works.
The competitive landscape in A63C is shaped by 20 distinct companies actively filing in this space. Future Motion, Inc. leads with 43 patents, followed by Bauer Hockey Llc at 29 grants and Salomon S.a.s. at 20.
Filing activity in A63C is down 1% over the past five years versus 2015-2019, a relatively steady filing pace. All counts come directly from USPTO PatentsView and reflect US granted utility patents only.
Is A63C innovation accelerating?
US utility-patent grants per year in A63C, 2015–2025 - recent five years are down 1% versus 2015–2019.
Who leads A63C?
The 12 most active assignees in SKATES; SKIS; ROLLER SKATES; DESIGN OR LAYOUT OF COURTS, RINKS OR THE LIKE - wider bars mean more grants
- Future Motion
Future Motion, Inc.
43 patents
- Bauer Hockey
BAUER HOCKEY LLC
29 patents
- Salomon S
Salomon S.A.S.
20 patents
- Skis Rossignol
SKIS ROSSIGNOL
19 patents
- Lekisport
LEKISPORT AG
18 patents
- Razor Usa 15
Razor USA LLC
15 patents
- Rottefella As 15
Rottefella AS
15 patents
- Spark R&Dip Holdings 13
SPARK R&DIP HOLDINGS, LLC
13 patents
- Graco Minnesota 12
Graco Minnesota Inc.
12 patents
- Karsten Manufacturing 11
Karsten Manufacturing Corporation
11 patents
- Sport Maska 11
SPORT MASKA INC.
11 patents
- Velasa Sports 11
Velasa Sports, Inc.
11 patents
What this shows Future Motion is the most active filer in A63C, holding 43 of the 1,092 patents in this class. Concentration at the top signals how contestable this technology area is for new entrants.
View data table
| Rank | Company | Patents in A63C |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | Future Motion, Inc. | 43 |
| #2 | Bauer Hockey Llc | 29 |
| #3 | Salomon S.a.s. | 20 |
| #4 | SKIS Rossignol | 19 |
| #5 | Lekisport Ag | 18 |
| #6 | Razor USA Llc | 15 |
| #7 | Rottefella AS | 15 |
| #8 | Spark R&DIP Holdings, Llc | 13 |
| #9 | Graco Minnesota Inc. | 12 |
| #10 | Karsten Manufacturing Corporation | 11 |
| #11 | Sport Maska Inc. | 11 |
| #12 | Velasa Sports, Inc. | 11 |
| #13 | G3 Genuine Guide Gear Inc. | 9 |
| #14 | Salewa Sport Ag | 9 |
| #15 | Koofy Innovation Limited | 8 |
| #16 | Alliance Design And Development Group | 8 |
| #17 | Marker Deutschland Gmbh | 8 |
| #18 | Ipcomm | 7 |
| #19 | NHS, Inc. | 7 |
| #20 | Boa Technology Inc. | 6 |
About This Class
CPC subclass A63C belongs to class A63.
1,092 patents were granted in this class between 2015 and 2025.
20 companies actively patent in this space.
Classification System
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) is a hierarchical patent classification system used by the USPTO and EPO.
Footprint here vs. claim strategy
Each dot is a leading A63C assignee, placed by how many patents it holds in this class (horizontal) against its company-wide average claims per patent (vertical) - a read on whether the class is led by broad-but-shallow filers or focused deep-claim players.
Top 14 A63C assignees by class footprint. Bubble size = patents in A63C. Source: USPTO PatentsView (claim depth is company-wide across all classes).
Frequently Asked Questions
What is CPC class A63C?
How many patents have been filed in A63C?
Which company holds the most patents in A63C?
How is patent data for A63C collected?
What is the difference between CPC class and subclass?
Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.