Where does PRO Performance Sports, LLC rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), PRO Performance Sports, LLC ranks #10,144 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does PRO Performance Sports, LLC hold?

PRO Performance Sports, LLC holds 31 US utility patents granted between 2015 and 2019, spanning 8 technology areas.

What is PRO Performance Sports, LLC's Innovation Score?

PRO Performance Sports, LLC has an Innovation Score of 26.7 out of 100 (21st percentile of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

Is PRO Performance Sports, LLC's patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

PRO Performance Sports, LLC's recent grant velocity is -100% compared to the prior five-year period (grant years, not application filing dates). Grant activity has slowed relative to earlier years.

What does claim depth mean for PRO Performance Sports, LLC's patents?

PRO Performance Sports, LLC's patents average 7.9 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the PRO Performance Sports, LLC patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView US Corporation

PRO Performance Sports, LLC

Q: What technology areas does PRO Performance Sports, LLC focus on?

PRO Performance Sports, LLC's top technology area is A63B (Apparatus FOR Physical Training, Gymnastics, Swimming, Climbing, OR FENCING; Ball GAMES; Training Equipment) with 11 patents, ranking #117 of 1,021 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 8 CPC subclasses total.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 31 granted patents across 8 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2019. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: A63B (Apparatus FOR Physical Training, Gymnastics, Swimming, Climbing, OR FENCING; Ball GAMES; Training Equipment).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, PRO ranks #10,144 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 31 patents across 8 technology areas.

#10,144
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: 21st percentile
by Innovation Score (26.7/100): 7.9
avg claims per patent: -100%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R10144 · US Corporation #10,144 · 31 grants

GRANTS-SMALL · UPPER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-SPARSE · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL

GRANTS-SMALL 31 grants
UPPER-Q #10,144/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH Orbbec
CPC-NARROW A63B · 8 areas
INNOV-THIN 26.7/100
CLAIMS-SPARSE 7.9 claims/avg
TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
VEL-DROP -100% vel
BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Orbbec Inc. (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How PRO’s 26.7 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 12.0 pts (45%) Velocity 0.0 pts (0%) Breadth 10.0 pts (37%) Claim depth 4.8 pts (18%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
Faster S R L · near

27
Motion Composites · near

27
PRO Performance Sports · this assignee

27
Kyoto Pharmaceutical… · near

27
LEM Intellectual… · near

27
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows PRO's Innovation Score is 26.7/100 (21st percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for PRO?

Each dot is one of PRO’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). PRO’s own 7.9 claims/patent is at or below the 13.7 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.

PRO vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where PRO's grants concentrate

PRO Performance Sports, LLC is a focused PatentsView assignee: 8 CPC subclasses with 35.5% of grants classified under A63B (Apparatus FOR Physical Training, Gymnastics, Swimming, Climbing, OR FENCING; Ball GAMES; Training Equipment). Peak complete grant year is 2015 (10 grants) versus a trough of 3 in 2019. By volume, PRO sits between Orbbec Inc. and Patheon Softgels Inc..

Orbbec

31
PIC

31
PMC Industries

31
PPC Broadband Fib…

31
Pacira Cryotech

31
Paragonix

31
Parion Sciences

31
Patheon Softgels

31
PRO Performance S… ◀

31

What this shows PRO holds 31 patents at rank #10,132, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near PRO

By rank, the assignees closest to #10,132 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in A63B (Apparatus FOR Physical Training)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in PRO's primary technology class.

Assignees with similar portfolio profiles

Two PlainPatent-derived peer sets for PRO, neither rank-band nor same-CPC leaders (those blocks stay above). In A63B (Apparatus FOR Physical Training), PRO ranks #117 of 1,021 assignees by patent count in that subclass.

Similar innovation score

Nearest assignees by Innovation Score (27 here).

Motion Composites Inc. 27 Faster S.R.L. 27 LEM Intellectual Property SA 27 Kyoto Pharmaceutical Industries, Ltd. 27

PRO's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

27 21st percentile higher than 21% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2015–2019

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

PRO Performance Sports, LLC patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2015	10	32.3%
2016	9	29.0%
2017	5	16.1%
2018	4	12.9%
2019	3	9.7%

Which technologies does PRO Performance Sports, LLC patent most?

A63B - Apparatus FOR Physical Training, Gymnastics, Swimming, Climbing, OR FENCING; Ball GAMES; Training Equipment 11

A63K - RACING; Riding SPORTS; Equipment OR Accessories Therefor 2

A61H - Physical Therapy Apparatus, e.g. Devices FOR Locating OR Stimulating Reflex Points IN THE BODY; Artificial RESPIRATION; MASSAGE; Bathing Devices FOR Special Therapeutic OR Hygienic Purposes OR Specific Parts OF THE Body 2

A61F - Filters Implantable Into Blood VESSELS; PROSTHESES; Devices Providing Patency TO, OR Preventing Collapsing OF, Tubular Structures OF THE Body, e.g. STENTS; Orthopaedic, Nursing OR Contraceptive DEVICES; FOMENTATION; Treatment OR Protection OF Eyes OR EARS; Bandages, Dressings OR Absorbent PADS; Firs 2

B25G - Handles FOR Hand Implements 1

Y10T - Technical Subjects Covered BY Former US Classification 1

E04H - Buildings OR Like Structures FOR Particular PURPOSES; Swimming OR Splash Baths OR POOLS; MASTS; FENCING; Tents OR Canopies, IN General 1

E06C - Ladders 1

Top 8 of 8 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

PRO Performance Sports, LLC's patent record in context - here's where to go next.

PRO Performance Sports, LLC's lead technology class is A63B (Apparatus FOR Physical Training, Gymnastics, Swimming, Climbing, OR FENCING; Ball GAMES; Training Equipment), 35.5% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore A63B
Ranked #10,144 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare PRO Performance Sports, LLC against Orbbec Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 26.7/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent, US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.