Overall rank by patents
#16,756
of 49,997 tracked assignees
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 17 granted patents across 6 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2023. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: A01K (Animal HUSBANDRY; AVICULTURE; APICULTURE; PISCICULTURE; FISHING; Rearing OR Breeding Animals, NOT Otherwise Provided FOR; NEW Breeds OF Animals).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Eco ranks #16,756 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 17 patents across 6 technology areas.
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R16756 · US Corporation #16,756 · 17 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-PAR · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DOWN · BOOK-FULL
Nearest grant-volume peer: Eight Plus Ventures, LLC (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
Eco Sports Group · this assignee
27 score
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Eco's Innovation Score is 26.9/100 (22nd percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Eco Sports Group, Inc. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 6 CPC subclasses with 47.1% of grants classified under A01K (Animal HUSBANDRY; AVICULTURE; APICULTURE; PISCICULTURE; FISHING; Rearing OR Breeding Animals, NOT Otherwise Provided FOR; NEW Breeds OF Animals). Peak complete grant year is 2019 (4 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2015. By volume, Eco sits between Erdos Miller, Inc. and Elite Manufacturing Corporation.
Eco Sports Group, Inc. shows 3 grants in 2022–2024 against only 9 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
Erdos Miller, Inc.
17 patents
Etex Services NV
17 patents
EVR Motors Ltd
17 patents
Excelero Storage Ltd.
17 patents
Eight Plus Ventures, LLC
17 patents
Electronic Controlled Systems, Inc.
17 patents
Eliezer Krausz Industrial Development Ltd.
17 patents
Elite Manufacturing Corporation
17 patents
Eco Sports Group, Inc.
17 patents
What this shows Eco holds 17 patents at rank #16,770, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
By rank, the assignees closest to #16,770 in granted patent volume.
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Eco's primary technology class.
Eco's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
27 22nd percentile higher than 22% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 1 | 5.9% |
| 2017 | 3 | 17.6% |
| 2018 | 1 | 5.9% |
| 2019 | 4 | 23.5% |
| 2020 | 2 | 11.8% |
| 2021 | 3 | 17.6% |
| 2022 | 1 | 5.9% |
| 2023 | 2 | 11.8% |
Top 6 of 6 technology areas
Overall rank by patents
#16,756
of 49,997 tracked assignees
26.9 out of 100
What to do with this data
Eco Sports Group, Inc.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.