CPC technology class · A63
A63D - Bowling Games
Bowling games, e.g. skittles, bocce or bowls; installations therefor; bagatelle or similar games; billiards. 78 US utility patents granted 2015–2025, with the leading assignees and year-by-year grant trajectory.
- 78
- US patents granted
- A63
- Parent CPC class
- 9
- Active assignees
- +23%
- 5-yr velocity
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Bowling Games ranks #629 of 670 CPC technology areas - 78 US patents granted since 2015, with recorded grant volume up 23% over five years.
- #629
- of 670 CPC technology areas
- 78
- US patents granted, 2015–2025
- Qubicaamf Europe S P A
- leading assignee (6)
- +23%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
CPC subclass A63D - BOWLING GAMES, e.g. SKITTLES, BOCCE OR BOWLS; INSTALLATIONS THEREFOR; BAGATELLE OR SIMILAR GAMES; BILLIARDS - covers 78 US utility patents granted between 2015 and 2025 according to USPTO PatentsView records, within the broader CPC class A63 (SPORTS; GAMES; AMUSEMENTS). See our CPC classification guide for how the system works.
The historical grant record in A63D includes 9 distinct companies in this comparison. Qubicaamf Europe S.p.a. leads with 6 patents, followed by Qubicaamf Europe S.p.a. at 6 grants and Kegel, Llc at 3.
Recorded grant volume in A63D is up 23% over the past five years versus 2015-2019. This historical comparison does not measure current filings, investment, or technology momentum. All counts come directly from USPTO PatentsView and reflect US granted utility patents only.
How has recorded grant volume changed in A63D?
US utility-patent grants per year in A63D, 2015–2025 - recent five years are up 23% versus 2015–2019.
Who leads A63D?
The 12 most active assignees in BOWLING GAMES, e.g. SKITTLES, BOCCE OR BOWLS; INSTALLATIONS THEREFOR; BAGATELLE OR SIMILAR GAMES; BILLIARDS - wider bars mean more grants
- Smart Billiard Lighti…
Smart Billiard Lighting LLC
6 patents
- Qubicaamf Europe S P A
QUBICAAMF EUROPE S.P.A.
6 patents
- Kegel
Kegel, LLC
3 patents
- Brunswick Bowling Pro… 2
Brunswick Bowling Products LLC
2 patents
- Ao Kaspersky Lab 1
AO Kaspersky Lab
1 patents
- Williams-sonoma 1
Williams-Sonoma, Inc.
1 patents
- Dick's Sporting Goods 1
Dick's Sporting Goods, Inc.
1 patents
- Trinity International… 1
TRINITY INTERNATIONAL INDUSTRIES, L.L.C.
1 patents
- Qubicaamf Worldwide 1
QUBICAAMF WORLDWIDE, LLC
1 patents
What this shows Qubicaamf Europe S P A is the most active filer in A63D, holding 6 of the 78 patents in this class. Concentration at the top signals how contestable this technology area is for new entrants.
View data table
| Rank | Company | Patents in A63D |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | Smart Billiard Lighting Llc | 6 |
| #2 | Qubicaamf Europe S.p.a. | 6 |
| #3 | Kegel, Llc | 3 |
| #4 | Brunswick Bowling Products Llc | 2 |
| #5 | AO Kaspersky Lab | 1 |
| #6 | Williams-sonoma, Inc. | 1 |
| #7 | Dick's Sporting Goods, Inc. | 1 |
| #8 | Trinity International Industries, L.l.c. | 1 |
| #9 | Qubicaamf Worldwide, Llc | 1 |
About This Class
CPC subclass A63D belongs to class A63.
78 patents were granted in this class between 2015 and 2025.
9 companies actively patent in this space.
Classification System
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) is a hierarchical patent classification system used by the USPTO and EPO.
Footprint here vs. claim strategy
Each dot is a leading A63D assignee, placed by how many patents it holds in this class (horizontal) against its company-wide average claims per patent (vertical) - a read on whether the class is led by broad-but-shallow filers or focused deep-claim players.
Top 9 A63D assignees by class footprint. Bubble size = patents in A63D. Source: USPTO PatentsView (claim depth is company-wide across all classes).
Frequently Asked Questions
Where does CPC class A63D rank among technology areas?
What is CPC class A63D?
How many patents have been granted in A63D?
Which company holds the most patents in A63D?
How is patent data for A63D collected?
What is the difference between CPC class and subclass?
Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.