Overall rank by patents
#4,695
of 49,997 tracked assignees
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 75 granted patents across 16 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2017–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: A61B (DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; Identification).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Think ranks #4,695 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 75 patents across 16 technology areas.
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R4695 · US Corporation #4,695 · 75 grants
GRANTS-SMALL · TOP-DECILE · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-FOCUS · INNOV-PAR · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-SURGE · BOOK-FULL
Nearest grant-volume peer: Sturm, Ruger & Company, Inc. (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
Ixys · near
47 score
Think Surgical · this assignee
47 score
Zuora · near
47 score
Haworth · near
47 score
Kagoshima University · near
47 score
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Think's Innovation Score is 47.3/100 (top 19% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Think Surgical, Inc. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 16 CPC subclasses with 92% of grants classified under A61B (DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; Identification). Peak complete grant year is 2024 (12 grants) versus a trough of 2 in 2017. By volume, Think sits between Sturm, Ruger & Company, Inc. and Amyris, Inc..
From 2019–2021 to 2022–2024, Think Surgical, Inc. moved from 28 to 33 grants (1.18x the prior three-year total, a multiple, not a CAGR). See the growth leaderboard.
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
Sturm, Ruger & Company, Inc.
75 patents
Technogym S.P.A.
75 patents
Tescom Corporation
75 patents
Technische Universiteit Eindhoven
75 patents
Urban Armor Gear, LLC
75 patents
Think Surgical, Inc.
75 patents
8ME Nova, LLC
74 patents
Agro Selections Fruits
74 patents
Amyris, Inc.
74 patents
What this shows Think holds 75 patents at rank #4,695, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
By rank, the assignees closest to #4,695 in granted patent volume.
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Think's primary technology class.
Two PlainPatent-derived peer sets for Think, neither rank-band nor same-CPC leaders (those blocks stay above).
Nearest assignees by Innovation Score (47 here).
Nearest assignees by average claims per patent (17.2 here).
Think's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
47 Top 19% higher than 81% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2017–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2017 | 2 | 2.7% |
| 2018 | 6 | 8.0% |
| 2019 | 9 | 12.0% |
| 2020 | 8 | 10.7% |
| 2021 | 11 | 14.7% |
| 2022 | 11 | 14.7% |
| 2023 | 10 | 13.3% |
| 2024 | 12 | 16.0% |
| 2025partial year | 6 | 8.0% |
Top 15 of 16 technology areas
Overall rank by patents
#4,695
of 49,997 tracked assignees
47.3 out of 100
What to do with this data
Think Surgical, Inc.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.