Agro Selections Fruits
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 74 granted patents across 0 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength.
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Agro ranks #4,698 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 74 patents across 0 technology areas.
- #4,698
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 5th percentile
- by Innovation Score (18.7/100)
- 1.0
- avg claims per patent
- +3%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R4698 · Foreign Corporation #4,698 · 74 grants
GRANTS-SMALL · TOP-DECILE · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-UNK · INNOV-LOW · CLAIMS-SPARSE · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-FLAT · BOOK-RICH
- GRANTS-SMALL 74 grants
- TOP-DECILE #4,698/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH 8ME Nova
- CPC-UNK CPC blank
- INNOV-LOW 18.7/100
- CLAIMS-SPARSE 1.0 claims/avg
- TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
- VEL-FLAT +3% vel
- BOOK-RICH 9/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: 8ME Nova, LLC (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Agro’s 18.7 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Agro
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Beauty Yaurient… · near 19
Beauty Yaurient… · near
19 score
- Isarna Therapeutics · near 19
Isarna Therapeutics · near
19 score
- Agro Selections Fruits · this assignee 19
Agro Selections Fruits · this assignee
19 score
- Wd-40 · near 19
Wd-40 · near
19 score
- Pomona Ricerca S R L · near 19
Pomona Ricerca S R L · near
19 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Agro's Innovation Score is 18.7/100 (5th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Agro?
Each dot is one of Agro’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Agro’s own 1.0 claims/patent is at or below the 17.2 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.
Where Agro's grants concentrate
Agro Selections Fruits is a focused PatentsView assignee: 0 CPC subclasses . Peak complete grant year is 2020 (14 grants) versus a trough of 3 in 2019. By volume, Agro sits between Technische Universiteit Eindhoven and Allen Medical Systems, Inc..
Agro's three-year grant acceleration
From 2019–2021 to 2022–2024, Agro Selections Fruits moved from 27 to 13 grants (0.48x the prior three-year total, a multiple, not a CAGR). See the growth leaderboard.
Who files at Agro's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Technische Univer…
Technische Universiteit Eindhoven
75 patents
- Think Surgical
Think Surgical, Inc.
75 patents
- Urban Armor Gear
Urban Armor Gear, LLC
75 patents
- 8ME Nova
8ME Nova, LLC
74 patents
- Amyris
Amyris, Inc.
74 patents
- ASC Engineered So…
ASC Engineered Solutions, LLC
74 patents
- Aladdin Manufactu…
Aladdin Manufacturing Corporation
74 patents
- Allen Medical Sys…
Allen Medical Systems, Inc.
74 patents
- Agro Selections F… ◀
Agro Selections Fruits
74 patents
What this shows Agro holds 74 patents at rank #4,698, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Agro
By rank, the assignees closest to #4,698 in granted patent volume.
- Technische Universiteit Eindhoven #4,694 · 75 patents
- Think Surgical, Inc. #4,695 · 75 patents
- Urban Armor Gear, LLC #4,696 · 75 patents
- 8ME Nova, LLC #4,697 · 74 patents
- Amyris, Inc. #4,699 · 74 patents
- ASC Engineered Solutions, LLC #4,700 · 74 patents
- Aladdin Manufacturing Corporation #4,701 · 74 patents
- Allen Medical Systems, Inc. #4,702 · 74 patents
Assignees with similar portfolio profiles
Two PlainPatent-derived peer sets for Agro, neither rank-band nor same-CPC leaders (those blocks stay above).
Similar innovation score
Nearest assignees by Innovation Score (19 here).
Similar claim depth
Nearest assignees by average claims per patent (1.0 here).
Agro's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
19 5th percentile higher than 5% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 8 | 10.8% |
| 2016 | 8 | 10.8% |
| 2017 | 7 | 9.5% |
| 2018 | 10 | 13.5% |
| 2019 | 3 | 4.1% |
| 2020 | 14 | 18.9% |
| 2021 | 10 | 13.5% |
| 2022 | 4 | 5.4% |
| 2023 | 4 | 5.4% |
| 2024 | 5 | 6.8% |
| 2025partial year | 1 | 1.4% |
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Agro Selections Fruits's patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Ranked #4,698 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Agro Selections Fruits against Technische Universiteit Eindhoven, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 18.7/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.