Overall rank by patents
#4,698
Across all tracked assignees
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 74 granted patents across 0 technology areas, active 2015–2025. Filing-trend and competitive-moat analysis cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search.
The verdict
AGRO holds 74 US patents across 0 technology areas, rank #4,698 of 50,000 tracked assignees.
AGRO Selections Fruits has been granted 74 US utility patents between 2015 and 2025, placing AGRO Selections Fruits at rank #4,698 across all assignees tracked by PlainPatent. This portfolio spans 0 distinct Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) subclasses, averaging 1.0 claims per patent. As a Foreign Corporation, AGRO Selections Fruits is one of the more focused assignees in the PatentsView dataset. By volume, AGRO sits between Technische Universiteit Eindhoven (75 patents, rank #4,694) and Allen Medical Systems, Inc. (74 patents, rank #4,702) - the closest US assignees by grant volume. The composite Innovation Score of 18.7/100 blends portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth into a single comparable measure drawn directly from USPTO PatentsView records.
Filing cadence tells the strategic story. Between 2020 and 2025 the company received 38 grants, compared with 36 in the 2015–2019 window, a +6% shift in five-year velocity. Steady filing volume suggests sustained innovation without dramatic pivots. The Foreign Corporation classification further shapes interpretation, since corporate, government, and individual filers pursue patents for materially different reasons.
Claim depth and technology breadth together indicate competitive posture. AGRO Selections Fruits's 1.0 average claims per patent suggests focused, narrowly drawn claims typical of single-invention filings, while specialization in 0 subclasses reflects a tightly scoped invention area. Combined with portfolio volume, these signals let analysts, investors, and licensing professionals benchmark AGRO Selections Fruits against peers pursuing similar technology classes.
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
Technische Universiteit Eindhoven
75 patents
Think Surgical, Inc.
75 patents
Urban Armor Gear, LLC
75 patents
8ME NOVA, LLC
74 patents
AMYRIS, INC.
74 patents
ASC Engineered Solutions, LLC
74 patents
Aladdin Manufacturing Corporation
74 patents
Allen Medical Systems, Inc.
74 patents
AGRO SELECTIONS FRUITS
74 patents
What this shows AGRO holds 74 patents at rank #4,698, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
By rank, the assignees closest to #4,698 in granted patent volume.
AGRO's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
19 Top 95% higher than 5% of 50,000 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 8 | 10.8% |
| 2016 | 8 | 10.8% |
| 2017 | 7 | 9.5% |
| 2018 | 10 | 13.5% |
| 2019 | 3 | 4.1% |
| 2020 | 14 | 18.9% |
| 2021 | 10 | 13.5% |
| 2022 | 4 | 5.4% |
| 2023 | 4 | 5.4% |
| 2024 | 5 | 6.8% |
| 2025 | 1 | 1.4% |
Overall rank by patents
#4,698
Across all tracked assignees
18.7 out of 100
How to use this portfolio
AGRO's 74 grants land it in the top 95% by Innovation Score, but volume alone doesn't tell you where the strength sits.
Patent counts and the Innovation Score measure patenting activity, not commercial success or the legal strength of any patent. Many patents are filed defensively. Verify the status of an individual patent against official USPTO records.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.