Where does Taylor Made Golf Company, Inc. rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), Taylor Made Golf Company, Inc. ranks #718 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does Taylor Made Golf Company, Inc. hold?

Taylor Made Golf Company, Inc. holds 635 US utility patents granted between 2015 and 2025, spanning 27 technology areas.

What is Taylor Made Golf Company, Inc.'s Innovation Score?

Taylor Made Golf Company, Inc. has an Innovation Score of 57.2 out of 100 (top 5% of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

Is Taylor Made Golf Company, Inc.'s patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

Taylor Made Golf Company, Inc.'s recent grant velocity is +8% compared to the prior five-year period (grant years, not application filing dates). The company is maintaining or growing its granted-patent output.

What does claim depth mean for Taylor Made Golf Company, Inc.'s patents?

Taylor Made Golf Company, Inc.'s patents average 18.2 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the Taylor Made Golf Company, Inc. patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView US Corporation

Taylor Made Golf Company, Inc.

Q: What technology areas does Taylor Made Golf Company, Inc. focus on?

Taylor Made Golf Company, Inc.'s top technology area is A63B (Apparatus FOR Physical Training, Gymnastics, Swimming, Climbing, OR FENCING; Ball GAMES; Training Equipment) with 512 patents, ranking #4 of 1,021 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 27 CPC subclasses total.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 635 granted patents across 27 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: A63B (Apparatus FOR Physical Training, Gymnastics, Swimming, Climbing, OR FENCING; Ball GAMES; Training Equipment).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Taylor ranks #718 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 635 patents across 27 technology areas.

#718
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: Top 5%
by Innovation Score (57.2/100): 18.2
avg claims per patent: +8%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R718 · US Corporation #718 · 635 grants

GRANTS-MID · TOP-DECILE · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-FOCUS · INNOV-PAR · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-FLAT · BOOK-FULL

GRANTS-MID 635 grants
TOP-DECILE #718/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH Oath
CPC-FOCUS A63B · 27 areas
INNOV-PAR 57.2/100
CLAIMS-RICH 18.2 claims/avg
TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
VEL-FLAT +8% vel
BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Oath Inc. (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Taylor’s 57.2 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 22.3 pts (39%) Velocity 5.6 pts (10%) Breadth 18.4 pts (32%) Claim depth 10.9 pts (19%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
CDW · near

57
H B Fuller · near

57
LNW Gaming · near

57
Sumitomo Metal Mining · near

57
Taylor Made Golf · this assignee

57
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows Taylor's Innovation Score is 57.2/100 (top 5% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Taylor?

Each dot is one of Taylor’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Taylor’s own 18.2 claims/patent is ABOVE the 16.7 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.

Taylor vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Taylor's grants concentrate

Taylor Made Golf Company, Inc. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 27 CPC subclasses with 80.6% of grants classified under A63B (Apparatus FOR Physical Training, Gymnastics, Swimming, Climbing, OR FENCING; Ball GAMES; Training Equipment). Peak complete grant year is 2019 (79 grants) versus a trough of 38 in 2016. By volume, Taylor sits between Industry-university Cooperation Foundation Hanyang University and Covestro Deutschland AG.

Taylor's three-year grant acceleration

From 2019–2021 to 2022–2024, Taylor Made Golf Company, Inc. moved from 210 to 176 grants (0.84x the prior three-year total, a multiple, not a CAGR). Among 3,296 tracked assignees with ≥100 grants and ≥20 prior-period grants, that multiple ranks #1,697. See the growth leaderboard.

Industry-universi…

637
Ohio State Innova…

637
Schlage Lock

637
Oath

635
Taylor Made Golf ◀

635
The Regents of th…

634
Steelcase

632
Continental Teves…

631
Covestro Deutschl…

631

What this shows Taylor holds 635 patents at rank #718, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near Taylor

By rank, the assignees closest to #718 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in A63B (Apparatus FOR Physical Training)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Taylor's primary technology class.

Assignees with similar portfolio profiles

Two PlainPatent-derived peer sets for Taylor, neither rank-band nor same-CPC leaders (those blocks stay above). In A63B (Apparatus FOR Physical Training), Taylor ranks #4 of 1,021 assignees by patent count in that subclass.

Similar innovation score

Nearest assignees by Innovation Score (57 here).

Sumitomo Metal Mining Co., Ltd. 57 LNW Gaming, Inc. 57 H.B. Fuller Company 57 CDW LLC 57

Similar claim depth

Nearest assignees by average claims per patent (18.2 here).

Tyco Electronics (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. 18.2 avg Globalfoundries U.S. Inc. 18.2 avg Invista North America S.a.r.l. 18.2 avg Fidelity Information Services, LLC 18.2 avg

Taylor's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

57 Top 5% higher than 95% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2015–2025

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

Taylor Made Golf Company, Inc. patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2015	50	7.9%
2016	38	6.0%
2017	62	9.8%
2018	55	8.7%
2019	79	12.4%
2020	77	12.1%
2021	54	8.5%
2022	58	9.1%
2023	44	6.9%
2024	74	11.7%
2025partial year	44	6.9%

Which technologies does Taylor Made Golf Company, Inc. patent most?

A63B - Apparatus FOR Physical Training, Gymnastics, Swimming, Climbing, OR FENCING; Ball GAMES; Training Equipment 512

Y10T - Technical Subjects Covered BY Former US Classification 17

B29C - Shaping OR Joining OF PLASTICS; Shaping OF Material IN A Plastic State, NOT Otherwise Provided FOR; After-treatment OF THE Shaped Products, e.g. Repairing 14

B22C - Foundry Moulding 11

B22D - Casting OF METALS; Casting OF Other Substances BY THE Same Processes OR Devices 11

B29L - Indexing Scheme Associated With Subclass B29c, Relating TO Particular Articles 10

B32B - Layered Products, i.e. Products Built-up OF Strata OF Flat OR Non-flat, e.g. Cellular OR Honeycomb, Form 9

A43B - Characteristic Features OF FOOTWEAR; Parts OF Footwear 7

F15D - Fluid Dynamics, i.e. Methods OR Means FOR Influencing THE Flow OF Gases OR Liquids 7

A43C - Fastenings OR Attachments OF FOOTWEAR; Laces IN General 6

B23P - Metal-working NOT Otherwise Provided FOR; Combined OPERATIONS; Universal Machine Tools 6

B29K - Indexing Scheme Associated With Subclasses B29b, B29c OR B29d, Relating TO Moulding Materials OR TO Materials FOR ; Moulds, ; Reinforcements, Fillers OR Preformed Parts, e.g. Inserts 5

G01B - Measuring Length, Thickness OR Similar Linear DIMENSIONS; Measuring ANGLES; Measuring AREAS; Measuring Irregularities OF Surfaces OR Contours 5

G06Q - Information AND Communication Technology [ICT] Specially Adapted FOR Administrative, Commercial, Financial, Managerial OR Supervisory PURPOSES; Systems OR Methods Specially Adapted FOR Administrative, Commercial, Financial, Managerial OR Supervisory Purposes, NOT Otherwise Provided FOR 5

C08L - Compositions OF Macromolecular Compounds 5

Top 15 of 27 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

Taylor Made Golf Company, Inc.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.

Taylor Made Golf Company, Inc.'s lead technology class is A63B (Apparatus FOR Physical Training, Gymnastics, Swimming, Climbing, OR FENCING; Ball GAMES; Training Equipment), 80.6% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore A63B
Ranked #718 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare Taylor Made Golf Company, Inc. against Industry-university Cooperation Foundation Hanyang University, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 57.2/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent , US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.