Overall rank by patents
#717
Across all tracked assignees
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 635 granted patents across 37 technology areas, active 2017–2021. Filing-trend and competitive-moat analysis cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search. Primary class: G06F (ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING).
The verdict
Oath holds 635 US patents across 37 technology areas, rank #717 of 50,000 tracked assignees.
Oath Inc. has been granted 635 US utility patents between 2017 and 2021, placing Oath Inc. at rank #717 across all assignees tracked by PlainPatent. This portfolio spans 37 distinct Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) subclasses, averaging 19.6 claims per patent with primary concentration in G06F (ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING). As a US Corporation, Oath Inc. is one of the more focused assignees in the PatentsView dataset. By volume, Oath sits between Cooper Technologies Company (637 patents, rank #713) and Continental Teves Ag & Co. OHG (631 patents, rank #721) - the closest US assignees by grant volume. The composite Innovation Score of 55.6/100 blends portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth into a single comparable measure drawn directly from USPTO PatentsView records.
Filing cadence tells the strategic story. Between 2020 and 2025 the company received 258 grants, compared with 377 in the 2015–2019 window, a -32% shift in five-year velocity. A cooling filing rate may reflect portfolio consolidation, shifting priorities, or reduced R&D throughput. The US Corporation classification further shapes interpretation, since corporate, government, and individual filers pursue patents for materially different reasons.
Claim depth and technology breadth together indicate competitive posture. Oath Inc.'s 19.6 average claims per patent sits within the typical range for solid legal coverage without excessive prosecution cost, while a multi-domain presence across 37 subclasses balances depth with breadth. Combined with portfolio volume, these signals let analysts, investors, and licensing professionals benchmark Oath Inc. against peers pursuing similar technology classes.
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
Cooper Technologies Company
637 patents
INDUSTRY-UNIVERSITY COOPERATION FOUNDATION HANYANG UNIVERSITY
637 patents
Ohio State Innovation Foundation
637 patents
Schlage Lock Company LLC
637 patents
Taylor Made Golf Company, Inc.
635 patents
Oath Inc.
635 patents
The Regents of the University of Colorado, a Body Corporate
634 patents
Steelcase Inc.
632 patents
Continental Teves AG & Co. OHG
631 patents
What this shows Oath holds 635 patents at rank #717, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
By rank, the assignees closest to #717 in granted patent volume.
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Oath's primary technology class.
Oath's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
56 Top 7% higher than 93% of 50,000 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2017–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2017 | 18 | 2.8% |
| 2018 | 139 | 21.9% |
| 2019 | 220 | 34.6% |
| 2020 | 256 | 40.3% |
| 2021 | 2 | 0.3% |
Top 15 of 37 technology areas
Overall rank by patents
#717
Across all tracked assignees
55.6 out of 100
How to use this portfolio
Oath's 635 grants land it in the top 7% by Innovation Score, but volume alone doesn't tell you where the strength sits.
Patent counts and the Innovation Score measure patenting activity, not commercial success or the legal strength of any patent. Many patents are filed defensively. Verify the status of an individual patent against official USPTO records.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.