CPC technology class · A43
A43B - Characteristic Features OF Footwear
Characteristic features of footwear; parts of footwear. 6,010 US utility patents granted 2015–2025, with the leading assignees and year-by-year filing trajectory.
- 6,010
- US patents granted
- A43
- Parent CPC class
- 20
- Active assignees
- +55%
- 5-yr velocity
The verdict
Characteristic Features OF Footwear ranks #233 of 670 CPC technology areas - 6,010 US patents granted since 2015, with filing up 55% over five years.
- #233
- of 670 CPC technology areas
- 6,010
- US patents granted, 2015–2025
- Nike
- leading assignee (2,694)
- +55%
- filing velocity, last 5 yrs
CPC subclass A43B - CHARACTERISTIC FEATURES OF FOOTWEAR; PARTS OF FOOTWEAR - covers 6,010 US utility patents granted between 2015 and 2025 according to USPTO PatentsView records, within the broader CPC class A43 (FOOTWEAR). See our CPC classification guide for how the system works.
The competitive landscape in A43B is shaped by 20 distinct companies actively filing in this space. NIKE, Inc. leads with 2,694 patents, followed by Adidas Ag at 242 grants and Under Armour, Inc. at 158.
Filing activity in A43B is up 55% over the past five years versus 2015-2019, a sharp acceleration suggesting an emerging or fast-moving technology area. All counts come directly from USPTO PatentsView and reflect US granted utility patents only.
Is A43B innovation accelerating?
US utility-patent grants per year in A43B, 2015–2025 - recent five years are up 55% versus 2015–2019.
Who leads A43B?
The 12 most active assignees in CHARACTERISTIC FEATURES OF FOOTWEAR; PARTS OF FOOTWEAR - wider bars mean more grants
- Nike
NIKE, Inc.
2,694 patents
- adidas 242
adidas AG
242 patents
- Under Armour 158
Under Armour, Inc.
158 patents
- Asics 113
ASICS CORPORATION
113 patents
- Puma Se 74
PUMA SE
74 patents
- Reebok International 72
Reebok International Limited
72 patents
- Fast Ip 51
FAST IP, LLC
51 patents
- Mizuno 40
Mizuno Corporation
40 patents
- Wolverine Outdoors 36
Wolverine Outdoors, Inc.
36 patents
- Bauer Hockey 36
BAUER HOCKEY LLC
36 patents
- Ecco Sko A/S 35
ECCO Sko A/S
35 patents
- Acushnet 30
Acushnet Company
30 patents
What this shows Nike is the most active filer in A43B, holding 2,694 of the 6,010 patents in this class. Concentration at the top signals how contestable this technology area is for new entrants.
View data table
| Rank | Company | Patents in A43B |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | NIKE, Inc. | 2,694 |
| #2 | Adidas Ag | 242 |
| #3 | Under Armour, Inc. | 158 |
| #4 | Asics Corporation | 113 |
| #5 | PUMA SE | 74 |
| #6 | Reebok International Limited | 72 |
| #7 | FAST IP, Llc | 51 |
| #8 | Mizuno Corporation | 40 |
| #9 | Wolverine Outdoors, Inc. | 36 |
| #10 | Bauer Hockey Llc | 36 |
| #11 | ECCO Sko A/s | 35 |
| #12 | Acushnet Company | 30 |
| #13 | Deckers Outdoor Corporation | 30 |
| #14 | Boa Technology Inc. | 30 |
| #15 | Dynasty Footwear, Ltd. | 30 |
| #16 | COLE HAAN Llc | 29 |
| #17 | GEOX S.p.a. | 27 |
| #18 | Converse Inc. | 22 |
| #19 | Athalonz, Llc | 22 |
| #20 | Sport Maska Inc. | 21 |
About This Class
CPC subclass A43B belongs to class A43.
6,010 patents were granted in this class between 2015 and 2025.
20 companies actively patent in this space.
Classification System
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) is a hierarchical patent classification system used by the USPTO and EPO.
Footprint here vs. claim strategy
Each dot is a leading A43B assignee, placed by how many patents it holds in this class (horizontal) against its company-wide average claims per patent (vertical) - a read on whether the class is led by broad-but-shallow filers or focused deep-claim players.
Top 14 A43B assignees by class footprint. Bubble size = patents in A43B. Source: USPTO PatentsView (claim depth is company-wide across all classes).
Frequently Asked Questions
What is CPC class A43B?
How many patents have been filed in A43B?
Which company holds the most patents in A43B?
How is patent data for A43B collected?
What is the difference between CPC class and subclass?
Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.