CPC technology class · H10
H10K - Organic Electric Solid-state Devices
Organic electric solid-state devices. 50,923 US utility patents granted 2015–2025, with the leading assignees and year-by-year grant trajectory.
- 50,923
- US patents granted
- #2/5
- in H10
- 22.4%
- H10 class share
- +31%
- 5-yr velocity
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Organic Electric Solid-state Devices ranks #34 of 670 CPC technology areas - 50,923 US patents granted since 2015, with recorded grant volume up 31% over five years.
- #34
- of 670 CPC technology areas
- 50,923
- US patents granted, 2015–2025
- Samsung
- leading assignee (12,550)
- +31%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
How tightly H10K concentrates
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. holds 24.6% of H10K's recorded grants (12,550 of 50,923) - 7,850 more than BOE Technology Group Co., Ltd.. Across complete PatentsView years, the class peaked in 2024 at 5,235 grants and bottomed in 2015 at 3,109 (+68% peak-over-trough). Equal-window velocity 2020–2024 vs 2015–2019: +31% (24,023 vs 18,277 grants).
Leaderboard read
H10K concentration, lead at 24.6%
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. leads this historical grant record at 24.6% of H10K - foreign corporation assignees hold 94% of class grants (41,927 of 44,565). Figures describe granted US utility patents in this CPC subclass, not current investment or legal strength.
- Leader's share
- 24.6%
- Top three share
- 41.0%
- Lead over #2
- 7,850
12,550 of 50,923 grants
of the class's recorded grants
more grants than BOE Technology Group Co., Ltd.
Where H10K sits inside H10
Among 5 subclasses in H10 (Semiconductor DEVICES; Electric Solid-state Devices NOT Otherwise Provided FOR), H10K ranks #2 and holds 22.4% of the parent class's 227,396 recorded grants. Sibling chips below are the other subclasses in the same parent class, not the nationwide volume/lead-share peers further down.
Rising assignees active in H10K
Company-wide grant multiples (2022–2024 vs 2019–2021) among assignees with ≥5 patents in this subclass. Growth is company-wide; class patent counts are subclass-specific.
- #1 LX Semicon Co., Ltd. 177x 0 → 177 company-wide · 6 in H10K
- #2 Sharp Display Technology Corporation 144x 0 → 144 company-wide · 6 in H10K
- #3 Wuhan Tianma Microelectronics Co., Ltd. Shanghai Branch 142x 0 → 142 company-wide · 77 in H10K
- #4 Contemporary Amperex Technology (HONG KONG) Limited 87x 0 → 87 company-wide · 6 in H10K
- #5 AUO Corporation 61x 0 → 61 company-wide · 14 in H10K
H10K grants by year, peak 2024 (5,235)
US utility-patent grants per year in H10K, 2015–2025 - recent five years are up 31% versus 2015–2019.
Who leads H10K?
The 12 most active assignees in Organic Electric Solid-state Devices - wider bars mean more grants
- Samsung
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
12,550 patents
- Boe Technology Group 4,700
BOE Technology Group Co., Ltd.
4,700 patents
- Lg Display 3,613
LG Display Co., Ltd.
3,613 patents
- Semiconductor Energy… 2,381
Semiconductor Energy Laboratory Co., Ltd.
2,381 patents
- Chengdu Boe Optoelectr… 1,241
Chengdu BOE Optoelectronics Technology Co., Ltd.
1,241 patents
- Japan Display 1,176
Japan Display Inc.
1,176 patents
- Wuhan China Star… 1,105
Wuhan China Star Optoelectronics Semiconductor Display Technology Co., Ltd.
1,105 patents
- Universal Display 1,023
Universal Display Corporation
1,023 patents
- Sharp 732
Sharp Kabushiki Kaisha
732 patents
- Lg Chem 666
LG Chem, Ltd.
666 patents
- Sony Group 651
Sony Group Corporation
651 patents
- Merck Patent 545
Merck Patent GmbH
545 patents
What this shows Samsung is the most active filer in H10K, holding 12,550 of the 50,923 patents in this class. Concentration at the top signals how contestable this technology area is for new entrants.
View data table
| Rank | Company | Patents in H10K |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. | 12,550 |
| #2 | BOE Technology Group Co., Ltd. | 4,700 |
| #3 | LG Display Co., Ltd. | 3,613 |
| #4 | Semiconductor Energy Laboratory Co., Ltd. | 2,381 |
| #5 | Chengdu BOE Optoelectronics Technology Co., Ltd. | 1,241 |
| #6 | Japan Display Inc. | 1,176 |
| #7 | Wuhan China Star Optoelectronics Semiconductor Display Technology Co., Ltd. | 1,105 |
| #8 | Universal Display Corporation | 1,023 |
| #9 | Sharp Kabushiki Kaisha | 732 |
| #10 | LG Chem, Ltd. | 666 |
| #11 | Sony Group Corporation | 651 |
| #12 | Merck Patent GmbH | 545 |
| #13 | Innolux Corporation | 492 |
| #14 | Joled Inc. | 492 |
| #15 | Idemitsu Kosan Co., Ltd. | 394 |
| #16 | Tencent Technology (SHENZHEN) Company Limited | 371 |
| #17 | Shenzhen China Star Optoelectronics Semiconductor Display Technology Co., Ltd. | 332 |
| #18 | Beijing BOE Technology Development Co., Ltd. | 315 |
| #19 | Fujifilm Corporation | 308 |
| #20 | Sumitomo Chemical Company, Limited | 296 |
Footprint here vs. claim strategy
Each dot is a leading H10K assignee, placed by how many patents it holds in this class (horizontal) against its company-wide average claims per patent (vertical) - a read on whether the class is led by broad-but-shallow filers or focused deep-claim players.
Classes near H10K's 50,923-grant footprint
Nationwide nearest neighbors for H10K (#34 of 670 by volume ; lead share 24.6%) - not the H10 parent-class siblings above.
Nearest by grant volume
Nearest by lead-assignee share
Questions about H10K
Which company holds the most patents in H10K?
Which H10K assignees grew fastest recently?
How does H10K compare inside parent class H10?
What to do with this data
H10K in context - here's where to go next.
- Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. leads H10K with 12,550 grants in this class. See full portfolio
- H10K ranks #34 of 670 by grant volume among all tracked CPC technology areas. See the ranking
- Inside parent class H10, the largest sibling subclass is H10D with 96,746 grants. Explore H10D
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through 2026-05-15; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Methodology - H10K figures are USPTO PatentsView granted-utility totals for this subclass (50,923 grants in the tracked window).
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.