CPC technology class · E06
E06C - Ladders
Ladders. 653 US utility patents granted 2015–2025, with the leading assignees and year-by-year filing trajectory.
- 653
- US patents granted
- E06
- Parent CPC class
- 20
- Active assignees
- +18%
- 5-yr velocity
The verdict
Ladders ranks #511 of 670 CPC technology areas - 653 US patents granted since 2015, with filing up 18% over five years.
- #511
- of 670 CPC technology areas
- 653
- US patents granted, 2015–2025
- Werner
- leading assignee (59)
- +18%
- filing velocity, last 5 yrs
CPC subclass E06C - LADDERS - covers 653 US utility patents granted between 2015 and 2025 according to USPTO PatentsView records, within the broader CPC class E06 (DOORS, WINDOWS, SHUTTERS, OR ROLLER BLINDS IN GENERAL; LADDERS). See our CPC classification guide for how the system works.
The competitive landscape in E06C is shaped by 20 distinct companies actively filing in this space. Werner Co. leads with 59 patents, followed by Oshkosh Corporation at 44 grants and WING Enterprises, Incorporated at 35.
Filing activity in E06C is up 18% over the past five years versus 2015-2019, a relatively steady filing pace. All counts come directly from USPTO PatentsView and reflect US granted utility patents only.
Is E06C innovation accelerating?
US utility-patent grants per year in E06C, 2015–2025 - recent five years are up 18% versus 2015–2019.
Who leads E06C?
The 12 most active assignees in LADDERS - wider bars mean more grants
- Werner
Werner Co.
59 patents
- Oshkosh
OSHKOSH CORPORATION
44 patents
- Wing Enterprises Inco…
WING ENTERPRISES, INCORPORATED
35 patents
- Little Giant Ladder S…
LITTLE GIANT LADDER SYSTEMS, LLC
24 patents
- Iveco Magirus 12
IVECO MAGIRUS AG
12 patents
- New-tec Integration (… 10
New-Tec Integration (Xiamen) Co., Ltd.
10 patents
- Tricam Industries 9
Tricam Industries, LLC
9 patents
- Core Distribution 9
Core Distribution, Inc.
9 patents
- Panduit 8
Panduit Corp.
8 patents
- Louisville Ladder 7
LOUISVILLE LADDER INC.
7 patents
- Altec Industries 6
Altec Industries, Inc.
6 patents
- Safe Rack 6
Safe Rack LLC
6 patents
What this shows Werner is the most active filer in E06C, holding 59 of the 653 patents in this class. Concentration at the top signals how contestable this technology area is for new entrants.
View data table
| Rank | Company | Patents in E06C |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | Werner Co. | 59 |
| #2 | Oshkosh Corporation | 44 |
| #3 | WING Enterprises, Incorporated | 35 |
| #4 | Little Giant Ladder Systems, Llc | 24 |
| #5 | Iveco Magirus Ag | 12 |
| #6 | New-tec Integration (xiamen) Co., Ltd. | 10 |
| #7 | Tricam Industries, Llc | 9 |
| #8 | Core Distribution, Inc. | 9 |
| #9 | Panduit Corp. | 8 |
| #10 | Louisville Ladder Inc. | 7 |
| #11 | Altec Industries, Inc. | 6 |
| #12 | Safe Rack Llc | 6 |
| #13 | Ardisam, Inc. | 5 |
| #14 | Dorel Home Furnishings, Inc. | 5 |
| #15 | Hbtek, Inc. | 5 |
| #16 | Lampe Holding B.v. | 5 |
| #17 | Blue Moon Designs, Llc | 5 |
| #18 | Intex Marketing Ltd. | 4 |
| #19 | Polygroup Macau Limited (bvi) | 4 |
| #20 | Tie Down, Inc. | 4 |
About This Class
CPC subclass E06C belongs to class E06.
653 patents were granted in this class between 2015 and 2025.
20 companies actively patent in this space.
Classification System
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) is a hierarchical patent classification system used by the USPTO and EPO.
Footprint here vs. claim strategy
Each dot is a leading E06C assignee, placed by how many patents it holds in this class (horizontal) against its company-wide average claims per patent (vertical) - a read on whether the class is led by broad-but-shallow filers or focused deep-claim players.
Top 14 E06C assignees by class footprint. Bubble size = patents in E06C. Source: USPTO PatentsView (claim depth is company-wide across all classes).
Frequently Asked Questions
What is CPC class E06C?
How many patents have been filed in E06C?
Which company holds the most patents in E06C?
How is patent data for E06C collected?
What is the difference between CPC class and subclass?
Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.