Where does PF Loop, Inc. rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), PF Loop, Inc. ranks #49,564 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does PF Loop, Inc. hold?

PF Loop, Inc. holds 5 US utility patents granted between 2016 and 2020, spanning 3 technology areas.

What is PF Loop, Inc.'s Innovation Score?

PF Loop, Inc. has an Innovation Score of 27.3 out of 100 (23rd percentile of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

Is PF Loop, Inc.'s patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

PF Loop, Inc.'s recent grant velocity is -75% compared to the prior five-year period (grant years, not application filing dates). Grant activity has slowed relative to earlier years.

What does claim depth mean for PF Loop, Inc.'s patents?

PF Loop, Inc.'s patents average 26.2 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the PF Loop, Inc. patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView US Corporation

PF Loop, Inc.

Q: What technology areas does PF Loop, Inc. focus on?

PF Loop, Inc.'s top technology area is A63F (Card, Board, OR Roulette GAMES; Indoor Games Using Small Moving Playing BODIES; Video GAMES; Games NOT Otherwise Provided FOR) with 3 patents, ranking #392 of 894 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 3 CPC subclasses total.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 5 granted patents across 3 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2016–2020. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: A63F (Card, Board, OR Roulette GAMES; Indoor Games Using Small Moving Playing BODIES; Video GAMES; Games NOT Otherwise Provided FOR).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, PF ranks #49,564 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 5 patents across 3 technology areas.

#49,564
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: 23rd percentile
by Innovation Score (27.3/100): 26.2
avg claims per patent: -75%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R49564 · US Corporation #49,564 · 5 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · BOTTOM-DECILE · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-DENSE · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL

GRANTS-MICRO 5 grants
BOTTOM-DECILE #49,564/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH PET Marvel
CPC-NARROW A63F · 3 areas
INNOV-THIN 27.3/100
CLAIMS-DENSE 26.2 claims/avg
TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
VEL-DROP -75% vel
BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: PET Marvel Limited (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How PF’s 27.3 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 6.2 pts (23%) Velocity 0.0 pts (0%) Breadth 6.1 pts (22%) Claim depth 15.0 pts (55%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
MS Spaichingen · near

27
Veja Fair Trade Sarl · near

27
Xiamen iPrt Technology · near

27
American Biocarbon · near

27
PF Loop · this assignee

27
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows PF's Innovation Score is 27.3/100 (23rd percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for PF?

Each dot is one of PF’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). PF’s own 26.2 claims/patent is ABOVE the 12.8 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.

PF vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where PF's grants concentrate

PF Loop, Inc. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 3 CPC subclasses with 60% of grants classified under A63F (Card, Board, OR Roulette GAMES; Indoor Games Using Small Moving Playing BODIES; Video GAMES; Games NOT Otherwise Provided FOR). By volume, PF sits between PET Marvel Limited and Pharma Integration S.R.L..

PET Marvel

5
Petalux

5
Petit Auto Wash

5
Petvivo Holdings

5
PFW Aerospace

5
PGI International

5
Phagelux (Canada)

5
Pharma Integratio…

5
PF Loop ◀

5

What this shows PF holds 5 patents at rank #49,498, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near PF

By rank, the assignees closest to #49,498 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in A63F (Card)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in PF's primary technology class.

Assignees with similar portfolio profiles

Two PlainPatent-derived peer sets for PF, neither rank-band nor same-CPC leaders (those blocks stay above). In A63F (Card), PF ranks #392 of 894 assignees by patent count in that subclass.

Similar innovation score

Nearest assignees by Innovation Score (27 here).

American Biocarbon, LLC 27 MS Spaichingen GMBH 27 Xiamen iPrt Technology Co., Ltd. 27 Veja Fair Trade Sarl 27

PF's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

27 23rd percentile higher than 23% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2016–2020

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2016–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

PF Loop, Inc. patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2016	1	20.0%
2017	1	20.0%
2018	1	20.0%
2019	1	20.0%
2020	1	20.0%

Which technologies does PF Loop, Inc. patent most?

A63F - Card, Board, OR Roulette GAMES; Indoor Games Using Small Moving Playing BODIES; Video GAMES; Games NOT Otherwise Provided FOR 3

G06Q - Information AND Communication Technology [ICT] Specially Adapted FOR Administrative, Commercial, Financial, Managerial OR Supervisory PURPOSES; Systems OR Methods Specially Adapted FOR Administrative, Commercial, Financial, Managerial OR Supervisory Purposes, NOT Otherwise Provided FOR 3

H04L - Transmission OF Digital Information, e.g. Telegraphic Communication 2

Top 3 of 3 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

PF Loop, Inc.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.

PF Loop, Inc.'s lead technology class is A63F (Card, Board, OR Roulette GAMES; Indoor Games Using Small Moving Playing BODIES; Video GAMES; Games NOT Otherwise Provided FOR), 60% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore A63F
Ranked #49,564 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare PF Loop, Inc. against PET Marvel Limited, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 27.3/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent , US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.