PGI International, Ltd.
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 5 granted patents across 5 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2015. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: F16K (VALVES; TAPS; COCKS; ACTUATING-FLOATS; Devices FOR Venting OR Aerating).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, PGI ranks #49,566 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 5 patents across 5 technology areas.
- #49,566
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 8th percentile
- by Innovation Score (21.2/100)
- 11.8
- avg claims per patent
- -100%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R49566 · US Corporation #49,566 · 5 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · BOTTOM-DECILE · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-PAR · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 5 grants
- BOTTOM-DECILE #49,566/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Petit Auto Wash
- CPC-NARROW F16K · 5 areas
- INNOV-THIN 21.2/100
- CLAIMS-PAR 11.8 claims/avg
- TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
- VEL-DROP -100% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Petit Auto Wash, Inc. (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How PGI’s 21.2 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around PGI
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- PGI International · this assignee 21
PGI International · this assignee
21 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows PGI's Innovation Score is 21.2/100 (8th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for PGI?
Each dot is one of PGI’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). PGI’s own 11.8 claims/patent is at or below the 15.8 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.
Where PGI's grants concentrate
PGI International, Ltd. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 5 CPC subclasses with 60% of grants classified under F16K (VALVES; TAPS; COCKS; ACTUATING-FLOATS; Devices FOR Venting OR Aerating). By volume, PGI sits between Petit Auto Wash, Inc. and Pharmaresearch Co., Ltd..
Who files at PGI's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Petit Auto Wash
Petit Auto Wash, Inc.
5 patents
- Petvivo Holdings
Petvivo Holdings, Inc.
5 patents
- PF Loop
PF Loop, Inc.
5 patents
- PFW Aerospace
PFW Aerospace GMBH
5 patents
- Phagelux (Canada)
Phagelux (CANADA) Inc.
5 patents
- Pharma Integratio…
Pharma Integration S.R.L.
5 patents
- Pharmanutra S P A
Pharmanutra S.P.A.
5 patents
- Pharmaresearch
Pharmaresearch Co., Ltd.
5 patents
- PGI International ◀
PGI International, Ltd.
5 patents
What this shows PGI holds 5 patents at rank #49,500, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near PGI
By rank, the assignees closest to #49,500 in granted patent volume.
- Petit Auto Wash, Inc. #49,496 · 5 patents
- Petvivo Holdings, Inc. #49,497 · 5 patents
- PF Loop, Inc. #49,498 · 5 patents
- PFW Aerospace GMBH #49,499 · 5 patents
- Phagelux (CANADA) Inc. #49,501 · 5 patents
- Pharma Integration S.R.L. #49,502 · 5 patents
- Pharmanutra S.P.A. #49,503 · 5 patents
- Pharmaresearch Co., Ltd. #49,504 · 5 patents
Leaders in F16K (Valves)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in PGI's primary technology class.
- Hamilton Sundstrand Corporation (HSC) 309 in class
- Fisher Controls International LLC 309 in class
- Fujikin Incorporated 153 in class
- Cameron International Corporation 136 in class
- Emerson Process Management Regulator Technologies, Inc. 129 in class
- Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. 123 in class
- Mueller International, LLC 110 in class
- Kohler Co. 103 in class
PGI's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
21 8th percentile higher than 8% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 5 | 100.0% |
Which technologies does PGI International, Ltd. patent most?
Top 5 of 5 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
PGI International, Ltd.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- PGI International, Ltd.'s lead technology class is F16K (VALVES; TAPS; COCKS; ACTUATING-FLOATS; Devices FOR Venting OR Aerating), 60% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore F16K
- Ranked #49,566 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare PGI International, Ltd. against Petit Auto Wash, Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 21.2/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.