Where does Paragraf Limited rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), Paragraf Limited ranks #16,274 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does Paragraf Limited hold?

Paragraf Limited holds 18 US utility patents granted between 2020 and 2025, spanning 18 technology areas.

What is Paragraf Limited's Innovation Score?

Paragraf Limited has an Innovation Score of 56.8 out of 100 (top 6% of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

What technology areas does Paragraf Limited focus on?

Paragraf Limited's top technology area is H01L (Semiconductor Devices NOT Covered BY Class H10) with 12 patents, ranking #838 of 3,373 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 18 CPC subclasses total.

Is Paragraf Limited's patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

Insufficient historical data is available to calculate a velocity trend for Paragraf Limited.

What does claim depth mean for Paragraf Limited's patents?

Paragraf Limited's patents average 19.4 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the Paragraf Limited patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView Foreign Corporation

Paragraf Limited

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 18 granted patents across 18 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2020–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: H01L (Semiconductor Devices NOT Covered BY Class H10).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Paragraf ranks #16,274 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 18 patents across 18 technology areas.

#16,274
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: Top 6%
by Innovation Score (56.8/100): 19.4
avg claims per patent

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R16274 · Foreign Corporation #16,274 · 18 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-FOCUS · INNOV-PAR · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-FRNCORP · SPAN-YRS · BOOK-RICH

GRANTS-MICRO 18 grants
MID-PACK #16,274/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH Papierfabrik August…
CPC-FOCUS H01L · 18 areas
INNOV-PAR 56.8/100
CLAIMS-RICH 19.4 claims/avg
TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
SPAN-YRS 2020–2025 · 6y
BOOK-RICH 9/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Papierfabrik August Koehler SE (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Paragraf’s 56.8 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 10.2 pts (18%) Velocity 20.0 pts (35%) Breadth 15.0 pts (26%) Claim depth 11.7 pts (21%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
EMD Millipore · near

57
Giga-byte Technology · near

57
May Mobility · near

57
Paragraf · this assignee

57
Stichting Imec… · near

57
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows Paragraf's Innovation Score is 56.8/100 (top 6% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Paragraf?

Each dot is one of Paragraf’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Paragraf’s own 19.4 claims/patent is ABOVE the 14.1 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.

Paragraf vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Paragraf's grants concentrate

Paragraf Limited is a focused PatentsView assignee: 18 CPC subclasses with 66.7% of grants classified under H01L (Semiconductor Devices NOT Covered BY Class H10). Peak complete grant year is 2024 (6 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2020. By volume, Paragraf sits between Prevent-plus, LLC and Pet Fusion, LLC.

Paragraf's three-year grant acceleration

Paragraf Limited shows 15 grants in 2022–2024 against only 1 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.

Prevent-plus

18
Process4

18
Prominent

18
Papierfabrik Augu…

18
Peloton Therapeut…

18
Penta Security Sy…

18
Pepperl+Fuchs SE

18
Pet Fusion

18
Paragraf ◀

18

What this shows Paragraf holds 18 patents at rank #16,282, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near Paragraf

By rank, the assignees closest to #16,282 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in H01L (Semiconductor Devices NOT Covered BY Class H10)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Paragraf's primary technology class.

Assignees with similar portfolio profiles

Two PlainPatent-derived peer sets for Paragraf, neither rank-band nor same-CPC leaders (those blocks stay above). In H01L (Semiconductor Devices NOT Covered BY Class H10), Paragraf ranks #838 of 3,373 assignees by patent count in that subclass.

Similar innovation score

Nearest assignees by Innovation Score (57 here).

May Mobility, Inc. 57 Stichting Imec Nederland 57 Giga-byte Technology Co., Ltd. 57 EMD Millipore Corporation 57

Paragraf's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

57 Top 6% higher than 94% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2020–2025

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2020–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

Paragraf Limited patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2020	1	5.6%
2022	4	22.2%
2023	5	27.8%
2024	6	33.3%
2025partial year	2	11.1%

Which technologies does Paragraf Limited patent most?

H01L - Semiconductor Devices NOT Covered BY Class H10 12

H10D - Inorganic Electric Semiconductor Devices 8

C01B - Non-metallic ELEMENTS; Compounds THEREOF; ; Metalloids OR Compounds Thereof NOT Covered BY Subclass C01c 8

C23C - Coating Metallic MATERIAL; Coating Material With Metallic MATERIAL; Surface Treatment OF Metallic Material BY Diffusion Into THE Surface, BY Chemical Conversion OR SUBSTITUTION; Coating BY Vacuum Evaporation, BY Sputtering, BY ION Implantation OR BY Chemical Vapour Deposition, IN General 8

C30B - Single-crystal Growth ; Unidirectional Solidification OF Eutectic Material OR Unidirectional Demixing OF Eutectoid MATERIAL; Refining BY Zone-melting OF Material ; Production OF A Homogeneous Polycrystalline Material With Defined Structure ; Single Crystals OR Homogeneous Polycrystalline Material WI 6

G01R - Measuring Electric VARIABLES; Measuring Magnetic Variables 4

H10N - Electric Solid-state Devices NOT Otherwise Provided FOR 3

B82Y - Specific Uses OR Applications OF NANOSTRUCTURES; Measurement OR Analysis OF NANOSTRUCTURES; Manufacture OR Treatment OF Nanostructures 2

Y02E - Reduction OF Greenhouse GAS [GHG] Emissions, Related TO Energy Generation, Transmission OR Distribution 2

Y02P - Climate Change Mitigation Technologies IN THE Production OR Processing OF Goods 1

B05D - Processes FOR Applying Fluent Materials TO Surfaces, IN General 1

C09D - Coating Compositions, e.g. Paints, Varnishes OR LACQUERS; Filling PASTES; Chemical Paint OR INK REMOVERS; INKS; Correcting FLUIDS; WOODSTAINS; Pastes OR Solids FOR Colouring OR PRINTING; USE OF Materials Therefor 1

H10F - Inorganic Semiconductor Devices Sensitive TO Infrared Radiation, Light, Electromagnetic Radiation OF Shorter Wavelength OR Corpuscular Radiation 1

H10H - Inorganic Light-emitting Semiconductor Devices Having Potential Barriers 1

H02N - Electric Machines NOT Otherwise Provided FOR 1

Top 15 of 18 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

Paragraf Limited's patent record in context - here's where to go next.

Paragraf Limited's lead technology class is H01L (Semiconductor Devices NOT Covered BY Class H10), 66.7% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore H01L
Ranked #16,274 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare Paragraf Limited against Prevent-plus, LLC, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 56.8/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent, US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.