PlainPatent
USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView Foreign Corporation

Stichting IMEC Nederland

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 125 granted patents across 55 technology areas, active 2015–2025. Filing-trend and competitive-moat analysis cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search. Primary class: A61B (DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION).

Explore the portfolio See the ranking
125
Total patents granted
55
CPC technology areas
16.0
Avg claims per patent
+27%
5-year filing velocity

The verdict

Stichting holds 125 US patents across 55 technology areas, rank #3,050 of 50,000 tracked assignees.

#3,050
of 50,000 US assignees by volume
Top 6%
by Innovation Score (56.8/100)
16.0
avg claims per patent
+27%
filing velocity, last 5 yrs

Portfolio overview

Stichting IMEC Nederland has been granted 125 US utility patents between 2015 and 2025, placing Stichting IMEC Nederland at rank #3,050 across all assignees tracked by PlainPatent. This portfolio spans 55 distinct Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) subclasses, averaging 16.0 claims per patent with primary concentration in A61B (DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION). As a Foreign Corporation, Stichting IMEC Nederland is one of the broader-portfolio assignees in the PatentsView dataset. By volume, Stichting sits between Shenzhen Antop Technology Co., Ltd. (125 patents, rank #3,046) and Wm. Wrigley Jr. Company (125 patents, rank #3,054) - the closest US assignees by grant volume. The composite Innovation Score of 56.8/100 blends portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth into a single comparable measure drawn directly from USPTO PatentsView records.

Filing cadence tells the strategic story. Between 2020 and 2025 the company received 70 grants, compared with 55 in the 2015–2019 window, a +27% shift in five-year velocity. Steady filing volume suggests sustained innovation without dramatic pivots. The Foreign Corporation classification further shapes interpretation, since corporate, government, and individual filers pursue patents for materially different reasons.

Claim depth and technology breadth together indicate competitive posture. Stichting IMEC Nederland's 16.0 average claims per patent sits within the typical range for solid legal coverage without excessive prosecution cost, while a multi-domain presence across 55 subclasses balances depth with breadth. Combined with portfolio volume, these signals let analysts, investors, and licensing professionals benchmark Stichting IMEC Nederland against peers pursuing similar technology classes.

Who files at Stichting's volume?

Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀

patents

What this shows Stichting holds 125 patents at rank #3,050, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Source USPTO PatentsView, granted utility patents As of 2015–2025

Companies ranked near Stichting

By rank, the assignees closest to #3,050 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in A61B (Diagnosis)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Stichting's primary technology class.

Stichting's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

57 Top 6% higher than 94% of 50,000 US assignees

0–10: 687 US assignees (1%). Below this entry. 10–20: 2,527 US assignees (5%). Below this entry. 20–30: 13,162 US assignees (26%). Below this entry. 30–40: 15,294 US assignees (31%). Below this entry. 40–50: 11,491 US assignees (23%). Below this entry. 50–60: 5,058 US assignees (10%). This entry sits in this band. 60–70: 1,537 US assignees (3%). Above this entry. 70–80: 234 US assignees (0%). Above this entry. 80–90: 10 US assignees (0%). Above this entry. 90–100: 0 US assignees (0%). Above this entry. This assignee 0 100 every tracked assignee, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

681012141618 20152016201720182019202020212022202320242025 8
USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2015–2025

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table
Stichting IMEC Nederland patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year Patents Granted Share of Period
2015 12 9.6%
2016 11 8.8%
2017 11 8.8%
2018 8 6.4%
2019 13 10.4%
2020 17 13.6%
2021 11 8.8%
2022 8 6.4%
2023 13 10.4%
2024 13 10.4%
2025 8 6.4%

Which technologies does Stichting IMEC Nederland patent most?

Top 15 of 55 technology areas

Patent Moat Analysis

Portfolio Volume Moderate
Tech Breadth Multi-domain
Claim Depth Standard
Velocity Growing

Where it ranks

Overall rank by patents

#3,050

Across all tracked assignees

Innovation Score

56.8 out of 100

View all rankings →

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

How is Innovation Score calculated?

Frequently Asked Questions

How many patents does Stichting IMEC Nederland hold?
Stichting IMEC Nederland holds 125 US granted patents filed between 2015 and 2025, spanning 55 technology areas.
What is Stichting IMEC Nederland's Innovation Score?
Stichting IMEC Nederland has an Innovation Score of 56.8 out of 100. This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), filing velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).
What technology areas does Stichting IMEC Nederland focus on?
Stichting IMEC Nederland's top technology area is A61B (DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION) with 31 patents. The company has filed patents in 55 CPC subclasses total.
Is Stichting IMEC Nederland's patent filing rate increasing or decreasing?
Stichting IMEC Nederland's recent filing velocity is +27% compared to the prior five-year period. The company is maintaining or growing its patent output.
What does claim depth mean for Stichting IMEC Nederland's patents?
Stichting IMEC Nederland's patents average 16.0 claims each. This falls within the standard range, providing solid legal coverage.
How is the Stichting IMEC Nederland patent data sourced?
All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

How to use this portfolio

Stichting's 125 grants land it in the top 6% by Innovation Score, but volume alone doesn't tell you where the strength sits.

  • Read that count against the largest US assignees before treating it as dominance - Stichting ranks #3,050 of 50,000. Top 50 holders
  • Most of this portfolio concentrates in A61B - see who else leads that technology area. A61B leaders
  • Check what the four-part Innovation Score actually rewards before comparing it to another company. How the score works

Patent counts and the Innovation Score measure patenting activity, not commercial success or the legal strength of any patent. Many patents are filed defensively. Verify the status of an individual patent against official USPTO records.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent Editorial

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page
  • USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
  • Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
  • USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.