Oxford Nanopore Technologies PLC
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 178 granted patents across 35 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: C12Q (Measuring OR Testing Processes Involving Enzymes, Nucleic Acids OR Microorganisms ; Compositions OR Test Papers THEREFOR; Processes OF Preparing Such COMPOSITIONS; Condition-responsive Control IN Micr).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Oxford ranks #2,211 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 178 patents across 35 technology areas.
- #2,211
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- Top 8%
- by Innovation Score (54.1/100)
- 16.2
- avg claims per patent
- +170%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R2211 · Foreign Corporation #2,211 · 178 grants
GRANTS-MID · TOP-DECILE · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-FOCUS · INNOV-PAR · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-SURGE · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MID 178 grants
- TOP-DECILE #2,211/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH First Solar
- CPC-FOCUS C12Q · 35 areas
- INNOV-PAR 54.1/100
- CLAIMS-RICH 16.2 claims/avg
- TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
- VEL-SURGE +170% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: First Solar, Inc. (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Oxford’s 54.1 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Oxford
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Flowserve Management · near
Flowserve Management · near
54 score
- Korea Institute OF… · near
Korea Institute OF… · near
54 score
- Oxford Nanopore · this assignee
Oxford Nanopore · this assignee
54 score
- Seminis Vegetable… · near
Seminis Vegetable… · near
54 score
- Sumitomo Osaka Cement · near
Sumitomo Osaka Cement · near
54 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Oxford's Innovation Score is 54.1/100 (top 8% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Oxford?
Each dot is one of Oxford’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Oxford’s own 16.2 claims/patent is at or below the 17.6 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.
Where Oxford's grants concentrate
Oxford Nanopore Technologies PLC is a focused PatentsView assignee: 35 CPC subclasses with 77.5% of grants classified under C12Q (Measuring OR Testing Processes Involving Enzymes, Nucleic Acids OR Microorganisms ; Compositions OR Test Papers THEREFOR; Processes OF Preparing Such COMPOSITIONS; Condition-responsive Control IN Micr). Peak complete grant year is 2021 (32 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2016. By volume, Oxford sits between First Solar, Inc. and Topcon Positioning Systems, Inc..
Oxford's three-year grant acceleration
From 2019–2021 to 2022–2024, Oxford Nanopore Technologies PLC moved from 69 to 58 grants (0.84x the prior three-year total, a multiple, not a CAGR). Among 3,296 tracked assignees with ≥100 grants and ≥20 prior-period grants, that multiple ranks #1,685. See the growth leaderboard.
Who files at Oxford's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- First Solar
First Solar, Inc.
178 patents
- Guangdong Univers…
Guangdong University OF Technology
178 patents
- Korea Research In…
Korea Research Institute OF Standards AND Science
178 patents
- Morgan Stanley Se…
Morgan Stanley Services Group Inc.
178 patents
- Rockley Photonics
Rockley Photonics Limited
178 patents
- TE Connectivity S…
TE Connectivity Services GMBH
178 patents
- Texas Tech Univer…
Texas Tech University System
178 patents
- Topcon Positionin…
Topcon Positioning Systems, Inc.
178 patents
- Oxford Nanopore ◀
Oxford Nanopore Technologies PLC
178 patents
What this shows Oxford holds 178 patents at rank #2,211, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Oxford
By rank, the assignees closest to #2,211 in granted patent volume.
- First Solar, Inc. #2,207 · 178 patents
- Guangdong University OF Technology #2,208 · 178 patents
- Korea Research Institute OF Standards AND Science #2,209 · 178 patents
- Morgan Stanley Services Group Inc. #2,210 · 178 patents
- Rockley Photonics Limited #2,212 · 178 patents
- TE Connectivity Services GMBH #2,213 · 178 patents
- Texas Tech University System #2,214 · 178 patents
- Topcon Positioning Systems, Inc. #2,215 · 178 patents
Leaders in C12Q (Measuring OR Testing Processes Involving Enzymes)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Oxford's primary technology class.
- The Regents of the University of California 581 in class
- Life Technologies Corporation 546 in class
- Illumina, Inc. 445 in class
- President and Fellows of Harvard College 387 in class
- Immatics Biotechnologies GmbH 286 in class
- 10x Genomics, Inc. 282 in class
- The Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University 266 in class
- Pacific Biosciences OF California, Inc. 259 in class
Assignees with similar portfolio profiles
Two PlainPatent-derived peer sets for Oxford, neither rank-band nor same-CPC leaders (those blocks stay above). In C12Q (Measuring OR Testing Processes Involving Enzymes), Oxford ranks #28 of 2,502 assignees by patent count in that subclass.
Similar innovation score
Nearest assignees by Innovation Score (54 here).
Similar claim depth
Nearest assignees by average claims per patent (16.2 here).
Oxford's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
54 Top 8% higher than 92% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 2 | 1.1% |
| 2016 | 1 | 0.6% |
| 2017 | 10 | 5.6% |
| 2018 | 8 | 4.5% |
| 2019 | 19 | 10.7% |
| 2020 | 18 | 10.1% |
| 2021 | 32 | 18.0% |
| 2022 | 13 | 7.3% |
| 2023 | 20 | 11.2% |
| 2024 | 25 | 14.0% |
| 2025partial year | 30 | 16.9% |
Which technologies does Oxford Nanopore Technologies PLC patent most?
Top 15 of 35 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Oxford Nanopore Technologies PLC's patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Oxford Nanopore Technologies PLC's lead technology class is C12Q (Measuring OR Testing Processes Involving Enzymes, Nucleic Acids OR Microorganisms ; Compositions OR Test Papers THEREFOR; Processes OF Preparing Such COMPOSITIONS; Condition-responsive Control IN Micr), 77.5% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore C12Q
- Ranked #2,211 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Oxford Nanopore Technologies PLC against First Solar, Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 54.1/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.