USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView Foreign Corporation

Oxford Nanopore Technologies PLC

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 178 granted patents across 35 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: C12Q (Measuring OR Testing Processes Involving Enzymes, Nucleic Acids OR Microorganisms ; Compositions OR Test Papers THEREFOR; Processes OF Preparing Such COMPOSITIONS; Condition-responsive Control IN Micr).

RSS updates for this company

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Oxford ranks #2,211 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 178 patents across 35 technology areas.

#2,211
of 49,997 US assignees by volume
Top 8%
by Innovation Score (54.1/100)
16.2
avg claims per patent
+170%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R2211 · Foreign Corporation #2,211 · 178 grants

GRANTS-MID · TOP-DECILE · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-FOCUS · INNOV-PAR · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-SURGE · BOOK-FULL

  • GRANTS-MID 178 grants
  • TOP-DECILE #2,211/49,997
  • PHOTO-FINISH First Solar
  • CPC-FOCUS C12Q · 35 areas
  • INNOV-PAR 54.1/100
  • CLAIMS-RICH 16.2 claims/avg
  • TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
  • VEL-SURGE +170% vel
  • BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: First Solar, Inc. (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Oxford’s 54.1 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Innovation-score neighbourhood around Oxford

Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.

score

What this shows Oxford's Innovation Score is 54.1/100 (top 8% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score As of 2015–2025

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Oxford?

Each dot is one of Oxford’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Oxford’s own 16.2 claims/patent is at or below the 17.6 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.

Oxford vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView. 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 9 entities by Granted patents (volume) (X) and Avg claims / patent (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Volume + depthSelective & thoroughVolume over depthLean filer 177.9177.9178178.1 5101520 Granted patents (volume) Avg claims / patent First Solar, Inc. - 178, 18.16First SolarGuangdong University OF Technology - 178, 7.62Guangdong Univers…Korea Research Institute OF Standards AND Science - 178, 11.92Korea Research In…Morgan Stanley Services Group Inc. - 178, 17.61Morgan Stanley Se…Rockley Photonics Limited - 178, 19.15Rockley PhotonicsTE Connectivity Services GMBH - 178, 18.92TE Connectivity S…Texas Tech University System - 178, 17.1Texas Tech Univer…Topcon Positioning Systems, Inc. - 178, 17.68Topcon Positionin…Oxford Nanopore Technologies PLC - 178, 16.18Oxford Nanopore
Oxford vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Oxford's grants concentrate

Oxford Nanopore Technologies PLC is a focused PatentsView assignee: 35 CPC subclasses with 77.5% of grants classified under C12Q (Measuring OR Testing Processes Involving Enzymes, Nucleic Acids OR Microorganisms ; Compositions OR Test Papers THEREFOR; Processes OF Preparing Such COMPOSITIONS; Condition-responsive Control IN Micr). Peak complete grant year is 2021 (32 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2016. By volume, Oxford sits between First Solar, Inc. and Topcon Positioning Systems, Inc..

Oxford's three-year grant acceleration

From 2019–2021 to 2022–2024, Oxford Nanopore Technologies PLC moved from 69 to 58 grants (0.84x the prior three-year total, a multiple, not a CAGR). Among 3,296 tracked assignees with ≥100 grants and ≥20 prior-period grants, that multiple ranks #1,685. See the growth leaderboard.

Who files at Oxford's volume?

Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀

patents

What this shows Oxford holds 178 patents at rank #2,211, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Source USPTO PatentsView, granted utility patents As of 2015–2025

Companies ranked near Oxford

By rank, the assignees closest to #2,211 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in C12Q (Measuring OR Testing Processes Involving Enzymes)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Oxford's primary technology class.

Assignees with similar portfolio profiles

Two PlainPatent-derived peer sets for Oxford, neither rank-band nor same-CPC leaders (those blocks stay above). In C12Q (Measuring OR Testing Processes Involving Enzymes), Oxford ranks #28 of 2,502 assignees by patent count in that subclass.

Oxford's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

54 Top 8% higher than 92% of 49,997 US assignees

This assignee 0 100 every tracked assignee, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

010203040 20152016201720182019202020212022202320242025 30
USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2015–2025

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table
Oxford Nanopore Technologies PLC patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year Patents Granted Share of Period
2015 2 1.1%
2016 1 0.6%
2017 10 5.6%
2018 8 4.5%
2019 19 10.7%
2020 18 10.1%
2021 32 18.0%
2022 13 7.3%
2023 20 11.2%
2024 25 14.0%
2025partial year 30 16.9%

Which technologies does Oxford Nanopore Technologies PLC patent most?

Top 15 of 35 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

What to do with this data

Oxford Nanopore Technologies PLC's patent record in context - here's where to go next.

  • Oxford Nanopore Technologies PLC's lead technology class is C12Q (Measuring OR Testing Processes Involving Enzymes, Nucleic Acids OR Microorganisms ; Compositions OR Test Papers THEREFOR; Processes OF Preparing Such COMPOSITIONS; Condition-responsive Control IN Micr), 77.5% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore C12Q
  • Ranked #2,211 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
  • Compare Oxford Nanopore Technologies PLC against First Solar, Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
  • Innovation Score of 54.1/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.