Where does Morgan Stanley Services Group Inc. rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), Morgan Stanley Services Group Inc. ranks #2,210 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does Morgan Stanley Services Group Inc. hold?

Morgan Stanley Services Group Inc. holds 178 US utility patents granted between 2019 and 2025, spanning 23 technology areas.

What is Morgan Stanley Services Group Inc.'s Innovation Score?

Morgan Stanley Services Group Inc. has an Innovation Score of 61.2 out of 100 (top 3% of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

What technology areas does Morgan Stanley Services Group Inc. focus on?

Morgan Stanley Services Group Inc.'s top technology area is G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing) with 117 patents, ranking #476 of 13,878 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 23 CPC subclasses total.

Is Morgan Stanley Services Group Inc.'s patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

Morgan Stanley Services Group Inc.'s recent grant velocity is +4067% compared to the prior five-year period (grant years, not application filing dates). This indicates accelerating grant output.

What does claim depth mean for Morgan Stanley Services Group Inc.'s patents?

Morgan Stanley Services Group Inc.'s patents average 17.6 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the Morgan Stanley Services Group Inc. patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView US Corporation

Morgan Stanley Services Group Inc.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 178 granted patents across 23 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2019–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Morgan ranks #2,210 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 178 patents across 23 technology areas.

#2,210
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: Top 3%
by Innovation Score (61.2/100): 17.6
avg claims per patent: +4067%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R2210 · US Corporation #2,210 · 178 grants

GRANTS-MID · TOP-DECILE · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-FOCUS · INNOV-STRONG · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-SURGE · BOOK-FULL

GRANTS-MID 178 grants
TOP-DECILE #2,210/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH Campagnolo S R L
CPC-FOCUS G06F · 23 areas
INNOV-STRONG 61.2/100
CLAIMS-RICH 17.6 claims/avg
TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
VEL-SURGE +4067% vel
BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Campagnolo S.R.L. (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Morgan’s 61.2 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 17.9 pts (29%) Velocity 15.8 pts (26%) Breadth 17.0 pts (28%) Claim depth 10.6 pts (17%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
Agency FOR Defense… · near

61
Monolithic 3D · near

61
Ceremorphic · near

61
Morgan Stanley… · this assignee

61
Cedars Sinai… · near

61
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows Morgan's Innovation Score is 61.2/100 (top 3% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Morgan?

Each dot is one of Morgan’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Morgan’s own 17.6 claims/patent is ABOVE the 16.2 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.

Morgan vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Morgan's grants concentrate

Morgan Stanley Services Group Inc. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 23 CPC subclasses with 65.7% of grants classified under G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing). Peak complete grant year is 2024 (37 grants) versus a trough of 3 in 2019. By volume, Morgan sits between Campagnolo S.R.L. and Texas Tech University System.

Morgan's three-year grant acceleration

From 2019–2021 to 2022–2024, Morgan Stanley Services Group Inc. moved from 38 to 90 grants (2.37x the prior three-year total, a multiple, not a CAGR). Among 3,296 tracked assignees with ≥100 grants and ≥20 prior-period grants, that multiple ranks #138. See the growth leaderboard.

Campagnolo S R L

178
First Solar

178
Guangdong Univers…

178
Korea Research In…

178
Oxford Nanopore

178
Rockley Photonics

178
TE Connectivity S…

178
Texas Tech Univer…

178
Morgan Stanley Se… ◀

178

What this shows Morgan holds 178 patents at rank #2,210, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near Morgan

By rank, the assignees closest to #2,210 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Morgan's primary technology class.

Assignees with similar portfolio profiles

Two PlainPatent-derived peer sets for Morgan, neither rank-band nor same-CPC leaders (those blocks stay above). In G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing), Morgan ranks #476 of 13,878 assignees by patent count in that subclass.

Similar innovation score

Nearest assignees by Innovation Score (61 here).

Ceremorphic, Inc. 61 Cedars Sinai Medical Center 61 Agency FOR Defense Development 61 Monolithic 3D Inc. 61

Similar claim depth

Nearest assignees by average claims per patent (17.6 here).

Cable Television Laboratories, Inc. 17.6 avg Cilag GmbH International 17.6 avg Tower Partners Semiconductor Co., Ltd. 17.6 avg Engel Austria GMBH 17.6 avg

Morgan's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

61 Top 3% higher than 97% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2019–2025

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2019–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

Morgan Stanley Services Group Inc. patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2019	3	1.7%
2020	11	6.2%
2021	24	13.5%
2022	33	18.5%
2023	20	11.2%
2024	37	20.8%
2025partial year	50	28.1%

Which technologies does Morgan Stanley Services Group Inc. patent most?

G06F - Electric Digital Data Processing 117

H04L - Transmission OF Digital Information, e.g. Telegraphic Communication 62

G06Q - Information AND Communication Technology [ICT] Specially Adapted FOR Administrative, Commercial, Financial, Managerial OR Supervisory PURPOSES; Systems OR Methods Specially Adapted FOR Administrative, Commercial, Financial, Managerial OR Supervisory Purposes, NOT Otherwise Provided FOR 49

G06N - Computing Arrangements Based ON Specific Computational Models 31

G06V - Image OR Video Recognition OR Understanding 12

G06T - Image Data Processing OR Generation, IN General 5

Y02P - Climate Change Mitigation Technologies IN THE Production OR Processing OF Goods 5

H04W - Wireless Communication Networks 4

G05B - Control OR Regulating Systems IN GENERAL; Functional Elements OF Such SYSTEMS; Monitoring OR Testing Arrangements FOR Such Systems OR Elements 4

G07F - Coin-freed OR Like Apparatus 3

G07G - Registering THE Receipt OF Cash, Valuables, OR Tokens 3

G10L - Speech Analysis Techniques OR Speech SYNTHESIS; Speech RECOGNITION; Speech OR Voice Processing TECHNIQUES; Speech OR Audio Coding OR Decoding 3

H04M - Telephonic Communication 3

G09B - Educational OR Demonstration APPLIANCES; Appliances FOR Teaching, OR Communicating With, THE Blind, Deaf OR MUTE; MODELS; PLANETARIA; GLOBES; MAPS; Diagrams 2

G16H - Healthcare Informatics, i.e. Information AND Communication Technology [ICT] Specially Adapted FOR THE Handling OR Processing OF Medical OR Healthcare Data 2

Top 15 of 23 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

Morgan Stanley Services Group Inc.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.

Morgan Stanley Services Group Inc.'s lead technology class is G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing), 65.7% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore G06F
Ranked #2,210 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare Morgan Stanley Services Group Inc. against Campagnolo S.R.L., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 61.2/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent , US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.