Overall rank by patents
#3,354
Across all tracked assignees
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 111 granted patents across 17 technology areas, active 2015–2025. Filing-trend and competitive-moat analysis cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search. Primary class: A61N (ELECTROTHERAPY; MAGNETOTHERAPY; RADIATION THERAPY; ULTRASOUND THERAPY).
The verdict
Neuropace holds 111 US patents across 17 technology areas, rank #3,354 of 50,000 tracked assignees.
Neuropace, Inc. has been granted 111 US utility patents between 2015 and 2025, placing Neuropace, Inc. at rank #3,354 across all assignees tracked by PlainPatent. This portfolio spans 17 distinct Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) subclasses, averaging 15.4 claims per patent with primary concentration in A61N (ELECTROTHERAPY; MAGNETOTHERAPY; RADIATION THERAPY; ULTRASOUND THERAPY). As a US Corporation, Neuropace, Inc. is one of the more focused assignees in the PatentsView dataset. By volume, Neuropace sits between Kulicke And Soffa Industries, Inc. (111 patents, rank #3,350) and Sagemcom Energy & Telecom SAS (111 patents, rank #3,358) - the closest US assignees by grant volume. The composite Innovation Score of 45.2/100 blends portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth into a single comparable measure drawn directly from USPTO PatentsView records.
Filing cadence tells the strategic story. Between 2020 and 2025 the company received 36 grants, compared with 75 in the 2015–2019 window, a -52% shift in five-year velocity. A cooling filing rate may reflect portfolio consolidation, shifting priorities, or reduced R&D throughput. The US Corporation classification further shapes interpretation, since corporate, government, and individual filers pursue patents for materially different reasons.
Claim depth and technology breadth together indicate competitive posture. Neuropace, Inc.'s 15.4 average claims per patent sits within the typical range for solid legal coverage without excessive prosecution cost, while concentration in 17 subclasses points to a focused technical program. Combined with portfolio volume, these signals let analysts, investors, and licensing professionals benchmark Neuropace, Inc. against peers pursuing similar technology classes.
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
Kulicke and Soffa Industries, Inc.
111 patents
MACNEIL IP LLC
111 patents
MUSC Foundation for Research Development
111 patents
MillerKnoll, Inc.
111 patents
PTC THERAPEUTICS, INC.
111 patents
ROM Technologies, Inc.
111 patents
S.V.V. TECHNOLOGY INNOVATIONS, INC.
111 patents
SAGEMCOM ENERGY & TELECOM SAS
111 patents
NeuroPace, Inc.
111 patents
What this shows Neuropace holds 111 patents at rank #3,354, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
By rank, the assignees closest to #3,354 in granted patent volume.
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Neuropace's primary technology class.
Neuropace's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
45 Top 24% higher than 76% of 50,000 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 18 | 16.2% |
| 2016 | 23 | 20.7% |
| 2017 | 13 | 11.7% |
| 2018 | 7 | 6.3% |
| 2019 | 14 | 12.6% |
| 2020 | 6 | 5.4% |
| 2021 | 5 | 4.5% |
| 2022 | 5 | 4.5% |
| 2023 | 9 | 8.1% |
| 2024 | 5 | 4.5% |
| 2025 | 6 | 5.4% |
Top 15 of 17 technology areas
Overall rank by patents
#3,354
Across all tracked assignees
45.2 out of 100
How to use this portfolio
Neuropace's 111 grants land it in the top 24% by Innovation Score, but volume alone doesn't tell you where the strength sits.
Patent counts and the Innovation Score measure patenting activity, not commercial success or the legal strength of any patent. Many patents are filed defensively. Verify the status of an individual patent against official USPTO records.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.