USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView Foreign Corporation

MTG Co., Ltd.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record — 85 granted patents across 24 technology areas, active 2015–2025. Filing-trend and competitive-moat analysis cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search. Primary class: A61N (ELECTROTHERAPY; MAGNETOTHERAPY; RADIATION THERAPY; ULTRASOUND THERAPY).

85
Total patents granted
24
CPC technology areas
3.1
Avg claims per patent
-27%
5-year filing velocity

The verdict

MTG holds 85 US patents across 24 technology areas — rank #4,207 of 50,000 tracked assignees.

#4,207
of 50,000 US assignees by volume
Top 48%
by Innovation Score (35.7/100)
3.1
avg claims per patent
-27%
filing velocity, last 5 yrs

Portfolio overview

MTG CO., LTD. has been granted 85 US utility patents between 2015 and 2025, placing MTG CO., LTD. at rank #4,207 across all assignees tracked by PlainPatent. This portfolio spans 24 distinct Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) subclasses, averaging 3.1 claims per patent with primary concentration in A61N (ELECTROTHERAPY; MAGNETOTHERAPY; RADIATION THERAPY; ULTRASOUND THERAPY). As a Foreign Corporation, MTG CO., LTD. is one of the more focused assignees in the PatentsView dataset. The composite Innovation Score of 35.7/100 blends portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth into a single comparable measure drawn directly from USPTO PatentsView records.

Filing cadence tells the strategic story. Between 2020 and 2025 the company received 36 grants, compared with 49 in the 2015–2019 window — a -27% shift in five-year velocity. A cooling filing rate may reflect portfolio consolidation, shifting priorities, or reduced R&D throughput. The Foreign Corporation classification further shapes interpretation, since corporate, government, and individual filers pursue patents for materially different reasons.

Claim depth and technology breadth together indicate competitive posture. MTG CO., LTD.'s 3.1 average claims per patent suggests focused, narrowly drawn claims typical of single-invention filings, while a multi-domain presence across 24 subclasses balances depth with breadth. Combined with portfolio volume, these signals let analysts, investors, and licensing professionals benchmark MTG CO., LTD. against peers pursuing similar technology classes.

How does MTG compare?

Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus the largest corporate holders — this company marked ◀

patents

What this shows MTG holds 85 patents — placing it at rank #4,207 overall, well behind the volume leaders but ahead of the tens of thousands of smaller assignees in the dataset.

Source USPTO PatentsView — granted utility patents As of 2015–2025

MTG's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

36 Top 48% higher than 52% of 50,000 US assignees

0–10: 687 US assignees (1%). Below this entry. 10–20: 2,527 US assignees (5%). Below this entry. 20–30: 13,162 US assignees (26%). Below this entry. 30–40: 15,294 US assignees (31%). This entry sits in this band. 40–50: 11,491 US assignees (23%). Above this entry. 50–60: 5,058 US assignees (10%). Above this entry. 60–70: 1,537 US assignees (3%). Above this entry. 70–80: 234 US assignees (0%). Above this entry. 80–90: 10 US assignees (0%). Above this entry. 90–100: 0 US assignees (0%). Above this entry. This assignee 0 100 every tracked assignee, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView — PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2015–2025

-100102030 20152016201720182019202020212022202320242025 9
USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2015–2025

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table
MTG CO., LTD. patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year Patents Granted Share of Period
2015 10 11.8%
2016 3 3.5%
2017 6 7.1%
2018 4 4.7%
2019 26 30.6%
2020 17 20.0%
2021 2 2.4%
2022 4 4.7%
2023 3 3.5%
2024 1 1.2%
2025 9 10.6%

Patent Moat Analysis

Portfolio Volume Light
Tech Breadth Multi-domain
Claim Depth Simple
Velocity Declining

Where it ranks

Overall rank by patents

#4,207

Across all tracked assignees

Innovation Score

35.7 out of 100

View all rankings →

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView — US granted patents 2015–2025

How is Innovation Score calculated?

Frequently Asked Questions

How many patents does MTG CO., LTD. hold?
MTG CO., LTD. holds 85 US granted patents filed between 2015 and 2025, spanning 24 technology areas.
What is MTG CO., LTD.'s Innovation Score?
MTG CO., LTD. has an Innovation Score of 35.7 out of 100. This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), filing velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).
What technology areas does MTG CO., LTD. focus on?
MTG CO., LTD.'s top technology area is A61N (ELECTROTHERAPY; MAGNETOTHERAPY; RADIATION THERAPY; ULTRASOUND THERAPY) with 5 patents. The company has filed patents in 24 CPC subclasses total.
Is MTG CO., LTD.'s patent filing rate increasing or decreasing?
MTG CO., LTD.'s recent filing velocity is -27% compared to the prior five-year period. Filing activity has slowed relative to earlier years.
What does claim depth mean for MTG CO., LTD.'s patents?
MTG CO., LTD.'s patents average 3.1 claims each. This is relatively simple claim structure, typical for focused inventions.
How is the MTG CO., LTD. patent data sourced?
All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

Learn More

How to use this portfolio

MTG's 85 grants land it in the top 48% by Innovation Score — but volume alone doesn't tell you where the strength sits.

  • Read that count against the largest US assignees before treating it as dominance — MTG ranks #4,207 of 50,000. Top 50 holders
  • Most of this portfolio concentrates in A61N — see who else leads that technology area. A61N leaders
  • Check what the four-part Innovation Score actually rewards before comparing it to another company. How the score works

Patent counts and the Innovation Score measure patenting activity — not commercial success or the legal strength of any patent. Many patents are filed defensively. Verify the status of an individual patent against official USPTO records.

Explore the patent dataset

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView — official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent Editorial

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Data sources used on this page
  • USPTO PatentsView — the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
  • Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) — the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
  • USPTO Patent Public Search — the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov