Overall rank by patents
#2,913
Across all tracked assignees
USPTO PatentsView assignee record — 131 granted patents across 5 technology areas, active 2016–2025. Filing-trend and competitive-moat analysis cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search. Primary class: B65D (CONTAINERS FOR STORAGE OR TRANSPORT OF ARTICLES OR MATERIALS, e.g. BAGS, BARRELS, BOTTLES, BOXES, CANS, CARTONS, CRATES, DRUMS, JARS, TANKS, HOPPERS, FORWARDING CONTAINERS; ACCESSORIES, CLOSURES, OR F).
The verdict
Inno-Pak holds 131 US patents across 5 technology areas — rank #2,913 of 50,000 tracked assignees.
Inno-Pak, LLC has been granted 131 US utility patents between 2016 and 2025, placing Inno-Pak, LLC at rank #2,913 across all assignees tracked by PlainPatent. This portfolio spans 5 distinct Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) subclasses, averaging 3.1 claims per patent with primary concentration in B65D (CONTAINERS FOR STORAGE OR TRANSPORT OF ARTICLES OR MATERIALS, e.g. BAGS, BARRELS, BOTTLES, BOXES, CANS, CARTONS, CRATES, DRUMS, JARS, TANKS, HOPPERS, FORWARDING CONTAINERS; ACCESSORIES, CLOSURES, OR F). As a US Corporation, Inno-Pak, LLC is one of the more focused assignees in the PatentsView dataset. The composite Innovation Score of 36.7/100 blends portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth into a single comparable measure drawn directly from USPTO PatentsView records.
Filing cadence tells the strategic story. Between 2020 and 2025 the company received 76 grants, compared with 55 in the 2015–2019 window — a +38% shift in five-year velocity. Steady filing volume suggests sustained innovation without dramatic pivots. The US Corporation classification further shapes interpretation, since corporate, government, and individual filers pursue patents for materially different reasons.
Claim depth and technology breadth together indicate competitive posture. Inno-Pak, LLC's 3.1 average claims per patent suggests focused, narrowly drawn claims typical of single-invention filings, while concentration in 5 subclasses points to a focused technical program. Combined with portfolio volume, these signals let analysts, investors, and licensing professionals benchmark Inno-Pak, LLC against peers pursuing similar technology classes.
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus the largest corporate holders — this company marked ◀
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.
106,890 patents
International Business Machines Corporation
72,926 patents
Canon Kabushiki Kaisha
34,378 patents
LG ELECTRONICS INC.
32,607 patents
TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING COMPANY LTD.
31,041 patents
Apple Inc.
30,560 patents
QUALCOMM Incorporated
30,354 patents
Intel Corporation
27,498 patents
Inno-Pak, LLC
131 patents
What this shows Inno-Pak holds 131 patents — placing it at rank #2,913 overall, well behind the volume leaders but ahead of the tens of thousands of smaller assignees in the dataset.
Inno-Pak's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
37 Top 46% higher than 54% of 50,000 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView — PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2016–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2016 | 13 | 9.9% |
| 2017 | 17 | 13.0% |
| 2018 | 10 | 7.6% |
| 2019 | 15 | 11.5% |
| 2020 | 18 | 13.7% |
| 2022 | 15 | 11.5% |
| 2023 | 24 | 18.3% |
| 2024 | 11 | 8.4% |
| 2025 | 8 | 6.1% |
Top 5 of 5 technology areas
Overall rank by patents
#2,913
Across all tracked assignees
36.7 out of 100
Inno-Pak, LLC's primary CPC class — all holders and yearly trends
See where Inno-Pak, LLC ranks among the largest US patent assignees
Browse every CPC technology area by patent activity
The four dimensions behind the Innovation Score
Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.
Read our methodology — how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.