CPC technology class · A46
A46B - Brushes
Brushes. 2,997 US utility patents granted 2015–2025, with the leading assignees and year-by-year filing trajectory.
- 2,997
- US patents granted
- A46
- Parent CPC class
- 20
- Active assignees
- +35%
- 5-yr velocity
The verdict
Brushes ranks #314 of 670 CPC technology areas - 2,997 US patents granted since 2015, with filing up 35% over five years.
- #314
- of 670 CPC technology areas
- 2,997
- US patents granted, 2015–2025
- Colgate-palmolive
- leading assignee (382)
- +35%
- filing velocity, last 5 yrs
CPC subclass A46B - BRUSHES - covers 2,997 US utility patents granted between 2015 and 2025 according to USPTO PatentsView records, within the broader CPC class A46 (BRUSHWARE). See our CPC classification guide for how the system works.
The competitive landscape in A46B is shaped by 20 distinct companies actively filing in this space. Colgate-palmolive Company leads with 382 patents, followed by L'oreal at 141 grants and The Braun Corporation at 71.
Filing activity in A46B is up 35% over the past five years versus 2015-2019, a sharp acceleration suggesting an emerging or fast-moving technology area. All counts come directly from USPTO PatentsView and reflect US granted utility patents only.
Is A46B innovation accelerating?
US utility-patent grants per year in A46B, 2015–2025 - recent five years are up 35% versus 2015–2019.
Who leads A46B?
The 12 most active assignees in BRUSHES - wider bars mean more grants
- Colgate-palmolive
Colgate-Palmolive Company
382 patents
- L'oreal 141
L'Oreal
141 patents
- The Braun 71
The Braun Corporation
71 patents
- The Gillette 53
The Gillette Company LLC
53 patents
- Trisa Holding 44
TRISA HOLDING AG
44 patents
- Dyson Technology 43
Dyson Technology Limited
43 patents
- Bissell 38
BISSELL Inc.
38 patents
- Albea Services 27
ALBEA SERVICES
27 patents
- Sharkninja Operating 22
SharkNinja Operating LLC
22 patents
- Geka 21
GEKA GmbH
21 patents
- Omron Healthcare 18
OMRON HEALTHCARE Co., Ltd.
18 patents
- Bissell Homecare 18
BISSELL Homecare, Inc.
18 patents
What this shows Colgate-palmolive is the most active filer in A46B, holding 382 of the 2,997 patents in this class. Concentration at the top signals how contestable this technology area is for new entrants.
View data table
| Rank | Company | Patents in A46B |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | Colgate-palmolive Company | 382 |
| #2 | L'oreal | 141 |
| #3 | The Braun Corporation | 71 |
| #4 | The Gillette Company Llc | 53 |
| #5 | Trisa Holding Ag | 44 |
| #6 | Dyson Technology Limited | 43 |
| #7 | Bissell Inc. | 38 |
| #8 | Albea Services | 27 |
| #9 | Sharkninja Operating Llc | 22 |
| #10 | GEKA Gmbh | 21 |
| #11 | Omron Healthcare Co., Ltd. | 18 |
| #12 | Bissell Homecare, Inc. | 18 |
| #13 | Water Pik, Inc. | 16 |
| #14 | Chanel Parfums Beaute | 16 |
| #15 | Willo 32 SAS | 16 |
| #16 | Aktiebolaget Electrolux | 14 |
| #17 | Sage Products, Llc | 13 |
| #18 | Sunstar Suisse Sa | 13 |
| #19 | Unger Marketing International, Llc | 12 |
| #20 | Kobayashi Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. | 12 |
About This Class
CPC subclass A46B belongs to class A46.
2,997 patents were granted in this class between 2015 and 2025.
20 companies actively patent in this space.
Classification System
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) is a hierarchical patent classification system used by the USPTO and EPO.
Footprint here vs. claim strategy
Each dot is a leading A46B assignee, placed by how many patents it holds in this class (horizontal) against its company-wide average claims per patent (vertical) - a read on whether the class is led by broad-but-shallow filers or focused deep-claim players.
Top 14 A46B assignees by class footprint. Bubble size = patents in A46B. Source: USPTO PatentsView (claim depth is company-wide across all classes).
Frequently Asked Questions
What is CPC class A46B?
How many patents have been filed in A46B?
Which company holds the most patents in A46B?
How is patent data for A46B collected?
What is the difference between CPC class and subclass?
Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.