Overall rank by patents
#4,163
Across all tracked assignees
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 86 granted patents across 14 technology areas, active 2015–2025. Filing-trend and competitive-moat analysis cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search. Primary class: F16D (COUPLINGS FOR TRANSMITTING ROTATION; CLUTCHES; BRAKES).
The verdict
Means holds 86 US patents across 14 technology areas, rank #4,163 of 50,000 tracked assignees.
Means Industries, Inc. has been granted 86 US utility patents between 2015 and 2025, placing Means Industries, Inc. at rank #4,163 across all assignees tracked by PlainPatent. This portfolio spans 14 distinct Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) subclasses, averaging 20.1 claims per patent with primary concentration in F16D (COUPLINGS FOR TRANSMITTING ROTATION; CLUTCHES; BRAKES). As a US Corporation, Means Industries, Inc. is one of the more focused assignees in the PatentsView dataset. By volume, Means sits between Kyocera SLD Laser, Inc. (86 patents, rank #4,159) and Protegrity Corporation (86 patents, rank #4,167) - the closest US assignees by grant volume. The composite Innovation Score of 46.9/100 blends portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth into a single comparable measure drawn directly from USPTO PatentsView records.
Filing cadence tells the strategic story. Between 2020 and 2025 the company received 54 grants, compared with 32 in the 2015–2019 window, a +69% shift in five-year velocity. An acceleration of this magnitude signals aggressive R&D investment and expanding technical ambition. The US Corporation classification further shapes interpretation, since corporate, government, and individual filers pursue patents for materially different reasons.
Claim depth and technology breadth together indicate competitive posture. Means Industries, Inc.'s 20.1 average claims per patent reflects complex, broadly scoped inventions that are difficult for competitors to design around, while concentration in 14 subclasses points to a focused technical program. Combined with portfolio volume, these signals let analysts, investors, and licensing professionals benchmark Means Industries, Inc. against peers pursuing similar technology classes.
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
KYOCERA SLD Laser, Inc.
86 patents
Kellogg Brown & Root LLC
86 patents
Kent State University
86 patents
MOCHIDA PHARMACEUTICAL CO., LTD.
86 patents
National Presto Industries, Inc.
86 patents
Neturen Co., Ltd.
86 patents
Novamont S.p.A.
86 patents
PROTEGRITY CORPORATION
86 patents
Means Industries, Inc.
86 patents
What this shows Means holds 86 patents at rank #4,163, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
By rank, the assignees closest to #4,163 in granted patent volume.
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Means's primary technology class.
Means's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
47 Top 20% higher than 80% of 50,000 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 7 | 8.1% |
| 2016 | 10 | 11.6% |
| 2017 | 6 | 7.0% |
| 2018 | 5 | 5.8% |
| 2019 | 4 | 4.7% |
| 2020 | 15 | 17.4% |
| 2021 | 7 | 8.1% |
| 2022 | 3 | 3.5% |
| 2023 | 7 | 8.1% |
| 2024 | 14 | 16.3% |
| 2025 | 8 | 9.3% |
Top 14 of 14 technology areas
Overall rank by patents
#4,163
Across all tracked assignees
46.9 out of 100
How to use this portfolio
Means's 86 grants land it in the top 20% by Innovation Score, but volume alone doesn't tell you where the strength sits.
Patent counts and the Innovation Score measure patenting activity, not commercial success or the legal strength of any patent. Many patents are filed defensively. Verify the status of an individual patent against official USPTO records.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.