Where does Line UP Corporation rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), Line UP Corporation ranks #41,441 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does Line UP Corporation hold?

Line UP Corporation holds 6 US utility patents granted between 2019 and 2021, spanning 4 technology areas.

What is Line UP Corporation's Innovation Score?

Line UP Corporation has an Innovation Score of 24.0 out of 100 (13th percentile of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

Is Line UP Corporation's patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

Line UP Corporation's recent grant velocity is +0% compared to the prior five-year period (grant years, not application filing dates). The company is maintaining or growing its granted-patent output.

What does claim depth mean for Line UP Corporation's patents?

Line UP Corporation's patents average 17.0 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the Line UP Corporation patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView Foreign Corporation

Line UP Corporation

Q: What technology areas does Line UP Corporation focus on?

Line UP Corporation's top technology area is A63F (Card, Board, OR Roulette GAMES; Indoor Games Using Small Moving Playing BODIES; Video GAMES; Games NOT Otherwise Provided FOR) with 4 patents, ranking #329 of 894 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 4 CPC subclasses total.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 6 granted patents across 4 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2019–2021. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: A63F (Card, Board, OR Roulette GAMES; Indoor Games Using Small Moving Playing BODIES; Video GAMES; Games NOT Otherwise Provided FOR).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Line ranks #41,441 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 6 patents across 4 technology areas.

#41,441
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: 13th percentile
by Innovation Score (24.0/100): 17.0
avg claims per patent: +0%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R41441 · Foreign Corporation #41,441 · 6 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · LOWER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-FLAT · BOOK-FULL

GRANTS-MICRO 6 grants
LOWER-Q #41,441/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH Limitless Computing
CPC-NARROW A63F · 4 areas
INNOV-THIN 24.0/100
CLAIMS-RICH 17.0 claims/avg
TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
VEL-FLAT +0% vel
BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Limitless Computing, Inc. (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Line’s 24.0 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 6.7 pts (28%) Velocity 0.0 pts (0%) Breadth 7.1 pts (30%) Claim depth 10.2 pts (43%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
Ningbo Crrc Times… · near

24
Heil Trailer… · near

24
Line UP · this assignee

24
O'brien Holding · near

24
Wolf Appliance · near

24
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows Line's Innovation Score is 24.0/100 (13th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Line?

Each dot is one of Line’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Line’s own 17.0 claims/patent is ABOVE the 13.0 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.

Line vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Line's grants concentrate

Line UP Corporation is a focused PatentsView assignee: 4 CPC subclasses with 66.7% of grants classified under A63F (Card, Board, OR Roulette GAMES; Indoor Games Using Small Moving Playing BODIES; Video GAMES; Games NOT Otherwise Provided FOR). Peak complete grant year is 2019 (3 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2021. By volume, Line sits between Limitless Computing, Inc. and Lips Corporation.

Limitless Computi…

6
Linctronix

6
Lind Equipment

6
Lindauer Dornier…

6
Linearity

6
Lintex

6
Lion Smart

6
Lips

6
Line UP ◀

6

What this shows Line holds 6 patents at rank #41,357, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near Line

By rank, the assignees closest to #41,357 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in A63F (Card)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Line's primary technology class.

Assignees with similar portfolio profiles

Two PlainPatent-derived peer sets for Line, neither rank-band nor same-CPC leaders (those blocks stay above). In A63F (Card), Line ranks #329 of 894 assignees by patent count in that subclass.

Similar innovation score

Nearest assignees by Innovation Score (24 here).

Heil Trailer International, LLC 24 O'brien Holding Co., Inc. 24 Wolf Appliance, Inc. 24 Ningbo Crrc Times Transducer Technology Co., Ltd. 24

Line's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

24 13th percentile higher than 13% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2019–2021

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2019–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

Line UP Corporation patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2019	3	50.0%
2020	2	33.3%
2021	1	16.7%

Which technologies does Line UP Corporation patent most?

A63F - Card, Board, OR Roulette GAMES; Indoor Games Using Small Moving Playing BODIES; Video GAMES; Games NOT Otherwise Provided FOR 4

G06F - Electric Digital Data Processing 1

G06T - Image Data Processing OR Generation, IN General 1

H04L - Transmission OF Digital Information, e.g. Telegraphic Communication 1

Top 4 of 4 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

Line UP Corporation's patent record in context - here's where to go next.

Line UP Corporation's lead technology class is A63F (Card, Board, OR Roulette GAMES; Indoor Games Using Small Moving Playing BODIES; Video GAMES; Games NOT Otherwise Provided FOR), 66.7% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore A63F
Ranked #41,441 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare Line UP Corporation against Limitless Computing, Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 24.0/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent , US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.