Linearity GMBH
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 6 granted patents across 8 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2022–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Linearity ranks #41,442 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 6 patents across 8 technology areas.
- #41,442
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- Top 17%
- by Innovation Score (48.3/100)
- 19.3
- avg claims per patent
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R41442 · Foreign Corporation #41,442 · 6 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · LOWER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-PAR · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-FRNCORP · SPAN-YRS · BOOK-RICH
- GRANTS-MICRO 6 grants
- LOWER-Q #41,442/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Linctronix
- CPC-NARROW G06F · 8 areas
- INNOV-PAR 48.3/100
- CLAIMS-RICH 19.3 claims/avg
- TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
- SPAN-YRS 2022–2025 · 4y
- BOOK-RICH 9/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Linctronix Ltd. (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Linearity’s 48.3 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Linearity
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Linearity · this assignee
Linearity · this assignee
48 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Linearity's Innovation Score is 48.3/100 (top 17% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Linearity?
Each dot is one of Linearity’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Linearity’s own 19.3 claims/patent is ABOVE the 9.7 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.
Where Linearity's grants concentrate
Linearity GMBH is a focused PatentsView assignee: 8 CPC subclasses with 50% of grants classified under G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing). By volume, Linearity sits between Linctronix Ltd. and LIT Brands, LLC.
Linearity's three-year grant acceleration
Linearity GMBH shows 4 grants in 2022–2024 against only 0 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.
Who files at Linearity's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Linctronix
Linctronix Ltd.
6 patents
- Lind Equipment
Lind Equipment Ltd.
6 patents
- Lindauer Dornier…
Lindauer Dornier Gesellschaft MIT Beschraenkter Haftung
6 patents
- Line UP
Line UP Corporation
6 patents
- Lintex
Lintex Co., Ltd.
6 patents
- Lion Smart
Lion Smart GmbH
6 patents
- Lips
Lips Corporation
6 patents
- LIT Brands
LIT Brands, LLC
6 patents
- Linearity ◀
Linearity GMBH
6 patents
What this shows Linearity holds 6 patents at rank #41,358, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Linearity
By rank, the assignees closest to #41,358 in granted patent volume.
- Linctronix Ltd. #41,354 · 6 patents
- Lind Equipment Ltd. #41,355 · 6 patents
- Lindauer Dornier Gesellschaft MIT Beschraenkter Haftung #41,356 · 6 patents
- Line UP Corporation #41,357 · 6 patents
- Lintex Co., Ltd. #41,359 · 6 patents
- Lion Smart GmbH #41,360 · 6 patents
- Lips Corporation #41,361 · 6 patents
- LIT Brands, LLC #41,362 · 6 patents
Leaders in G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Linearity's primary technology class.
- International Business Machines Corporation 42,717 in class
- Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. 21,497 in class
- Microsoft Technology Licensing, LLC 16,951 in class
- Google LLC 13,092 in class
- Intel Corporation 12,803 in class
- Apple Inc. 11,007 in class
- Amazon Technologies, Inc. 10,217 in class
- Dell Products L.P. 7,187 in class
Linearity's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
48 Top 17% higher than 83% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2022–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 2 | 33.3% |
| 2024 | 2 | 33.3% |
| 2025partial year | 2 | 33.3% |
Which technologies does Linearity GMBH patent most?
Top 8 of 8 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Linearity GMBH's patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Linearity GMBH's lead technology class is G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing), 50% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore G06F
- Ranked #41,442 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Linearity GMBH against Linctronix Ltd., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 48.3/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.