Illumina Cambridge Limited
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 253 granted patents across 42 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: C12Q (Measuring OR Testing Processes Involving Enzymes, Nucleic Acids OR Microorganisms ; Compositions OR Test Papers THEREFOR; Processes OF Preparing Such COMPOSITIONS; Condition-responsive Control IN Micr).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Illumina ranks #1,629 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 253 patents across 42 technology areas.
- #1,629
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- Top 3%
- by Innovation Score (62.0/100)
- 19.3
- avg claims per patent
- +57%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R1629 · Foreign Corporation #1,629 · 253 grants
GRANTS-MID · TOP-DECILE · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-WIDE · INNOV-STRONG · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-SURGE · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MID 253 grants
- TOP-DECILE #1,629/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Aruba Networks
- CPC-WIDE C12Q · 42 areas
- INNOV-STRONG 62.0/100
- CLAIMS-RICH 19.3 claims/avg
- TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
- VEL-SURGE +57% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Aruba Networks, Inc. (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Illumina’s 62.0 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Illumina
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Cameron International · near
Cameron International · near
62 score
- Fisher Controls… · near
Fisher Controls… · near
62 score
- Illumina Cambridge · this assignee
Illumina Cambridge · this assignee
62 score
- Medos International… · near
Medos International… · near
62 score
- Wirtgen · near
Wirtgen · near
62 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Illumina's Innovation Score is 62.0/100 (top 3% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Illumina?
Each dot is one of Illumina’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Illumina’s own 19.3 claims/patent is ABOVE the 10.4 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.
Where Illumina's grants concentrate
Illumina Cambridge Limited is a focused PatentsView assignee: 42 CPC subclasses with 83.8% of grants classified under C12Q (Measuring OR Testing Processes Involving Enzymes, Nucleic Acids OR Microorganisms ; Compositions OR Test Papers THEREFOR; Processes OF Preparing Such COMPOSITIONS; Condition-responsive Control IN Micr). Peak complete grant year is 2024 (34 grants) versus a trough of 10 in 2017. By volume, Illumina sits between Aruba Networks, Inc. and Garrett Transportation I Inc..
Illumina's three-year grant acceleration
From 2019–2021 to 2022–2024, Illumina Cambridge Limited moved from 75 to 94 grants (1.25x the prior three-year total, a multiple, not a CAGR). Among 3,296 tracked assignees with ≥100 grants and ≥20 prior-period grants, that multiple ranks #703. See the growth leaderboard.
Who files at Illumina's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Aruba Networks
Aruba Networks, Inc.
253 patents
- E Mishan & Sons
E. Mishan & Sons, Inc.
253 patents
- Heidelberger Druc…
Heidelberger Druckmaschinen AG
253 patents
- Home Depot Produc…
Home Depot Product Authority, LLC
253 patents
- Reebok Internatio…
Reebok International Limited
253 patents
- Stine Seed Farm
Stine Seed Farm, Inc.
253 patents
- Illumina Cambridge ◀
Illumina Cambridge Limited
253 patents
- Aurora Operations
Aurora Operations, Inc.
252 patents
- Garrett Transport…
Garrett Transportation I Inc.
252 patents
What this shows Illumina holds 253 patents at rank #1,629, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Illumina
By rank, the assignees closest to #1,629 in granted patent volume.
- Aruba Networks, Inc. #1,625 · 253 patents
- E. Mishan & Sons, Inc. #1,626 · 253 patents
- Heidelberger Druckmaschinen AG #1,627 · 253 patents
- Home Depot Product Authority, LLC #1,628 · 253 patents
- Reebok International Limited #1,630 · 253 patents
- Stine Seed Farm, Inc. #1,631 · 253 patents
- Aurora Operations, Inc. #1,632 · 252 patents
- Garrett Transportation I Inc. #1,633 · 252 patents
Leaders in C12Q (Measuring OR Testing Processes Involving Enzymes)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Illumina's primary technology class.
- The Regents of the University of California 581 in class
- Life Technologies Corporation 546 in class
- Illumina, Inc. 445 in class
- President and Fellows of Harvard College 387 in class
- Immatics Biotechnologies GmbH 286 in class
- 10x Genomics, Inc. 282 in class
- The Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University 266 in class
- Pacific Biosciences OF California, Inc. 259 in class
Assignees with similar portfolio profiles
Two PlainPatent-derived peer sets for Illumina, neither rank-band nor same-CPC leaders (those blocks stay above). In C12Q (Measuring OR Testing Processes Involving Enzymes), Illumina ranks #15 of 2,502 assignees by patent count in that subclass.
Similar innovation score
Nearest assignees by Innovation Score (62 here).
Similar claim depth
Nearest assignees by average claims per patent (19.3 here).
Illumina's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
62 Top 3% higher than 97% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 15 | 5.9% |
| 2016 | 18 | 7.1% |
| 2017 | 10 | 4.0% |
| 2018 | 24 | 9.5% |
| 2019 | 25 | 9.9% |
| 2020 | 19 | 7.5% |
| 2021 | 31 | 12.3% |
| 2022 | 28 | 11.1% |
| 2023 | 32 | 12.6% |
| 2024 | 34 | 13.4% |
| 2025partial year | 17 | 6.7% |
Which technologies does Illumina Cambridge Limited patent most?
Top 15 of 42 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Illumina Cambridge Limited's patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Illumina Cambridge Limited's lead technology class is C12Q (Measuring OR Testing Processes Involving Enzymes, Nucleic Acids OR Microorganisms ; Compositions OR Test Papers THEREFOR; Processes OF Preparing Such COMPOSITIONS; Condition-responsive Control IN Micr), 83.8% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore C12Q
- Ranked #1,629 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Illumina Cambridge Limited against Aruba Networks, Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 62.0/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.