Overall rank by patents
#201
Across all tracked assignees
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 2,014 granted patents across 37 technology areas, active 2015–2025. Filing-trend and competitive-moat analysis cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search. Primary class: G07F (COIN-FREED OR LIKE APPARATUS).
The verdict
IGT holds 2,014 US patents across 37 technology areas, rank #201 of 50,000 tracked assignees.
IGT has been granted 2,014 US utility patents between 2015 and 2025, placing IGT at rank #201 across all assignees tracked by PlainPatent. This portfolio spans 37 distinct Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) subclasses, averaging 17.1 claims per patent with primary concentration in G07F (COIN-FREED OR LIKE APPARATUS). As a US Corporation, IGT is one of the more focused assignees in the PatentsView dataset. By volume, IGT sits between Disney Enterprises, Inc. (2,051 patents, rank #197) and Lam Research Corporation (1,965 patents, rank #205) - the closest US assignees by grant volume. The composite Innovation Score of 67.5/100 blends portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth into a single comparable measure drawn directly from USPTO PatentsView records.
Filing cadence tells the strategic story. Between 2020 and 2025 the company received 1,100 grants, compared with 914 in the 2015–2019 window, a +20% shift in five-year velocity. Steady filing volume suggests sustained innovation without dramatic pivots. The US Corporation classification further shapes interpretation, since corporate, government, and individual filers pursue patents for materially different reasons.
Claim depth and technology breadth together indicate competitive posture. IGT's 17.1 average claims per patent sits within the typical range for solid legal coverage without excessive prosecution cost, while a multi-domain presence across 37 subclasses balances depth with breadth. Combined with portfolio volume, these signals let analysts, investors, and licensing professionals benchmark IGT against peers pursuing similar technology classes.
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
Disney Enterprises, Inc.
2,051 patents
Ethicon, Inc.
2,042 patents
Broadcom Corporation
2,041 patents
MASTERCARD INTERNATIONAL INCORPORATED
2,038 patents
IGT
2,014 patents
PRATT & WHITNEY CANADA CORP.
2,008 patents
KING FAHD UNIVERSITY OF PETROLEUM AND MINERALS
2,002 patents
SUBARU CORPORATION
1,977 patents
Lam Research Corporation
1,965 patents
What this shows IGT holds 2,014 patents at rank #201, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
By rank, the assignees closest to #201 in granted patent volume.
Other assignees with the most granted patents in IGT's primary technology class.
IGT's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
68 Top 1% higher than 99% of 50,000 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 238 | 11.8% |
| 2016 | 249 | 12.4% |
| 2017 | 159 | 7.9% |
| 2018 | 127 | 6.3% |
| 2019 | 141 | 7.0% |
| 2020 | 148 | 7.3% |
| 2021 | 137 | 6.8% |
| 2022 | 132 | 6.6% |
| 2023 | 164 | 8.1% |
| 2024 | 310 | 15.4% |
| 2025 | 209 | 10.4% |
Top 15 of 37 technology areas
Overall rank by patents
#201
Across all tracked assignees
67.5 out of 100
How to use this portfolio
IGT's 2,014 grants land it in the top 1% by Innovation Score, but volume alone doesn't tell you where the strength sits.
Patent counts and the Innovation Score measure patenting activity, not commercial success or the legal strength of any patent. Many patents are filed defensively. Verify the status of an individual patent against official USPTO records.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.