PlainPatent
USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView Foreign Corporation

Shanghai United Imaging Healthcare Co., Ltd.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 825 granted patents across 73 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2016–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: A61B (DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; Identification).

RSS updates for this company
Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Shanghai ranks #542 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 825 patents across 73 technology areas.

#542
of 49,997 US assignees by volume
Top 1%
by Innovation Score (69.0/100)
18.9
avg claims per patent
+576%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R542 · Foreign Corporation #542 · 825 grants

GRANTS-MID · TOP-DECILE · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-WIDE · INNOV-STRONG · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-SURGE · BOOK-FULL

  • GRANTS-MID 825 grants
  • TOP-DECILE #542/49,997
  • PHOTO-FINISH Silicon Laboratories
  • CPC-WIDE A61B · 73 areas
  • INNOV-STRONG 69.0/100
  • CLAIMS-RICH 18.9 claims/avg
  • TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
  • VEL-SURGE +576% vel
  • BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Silicon Laboratories Inc. (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Shanghai’s 69.0 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Innovation-score neighbourhood around Shanghai

Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.

score

What this shows Shanghai's Innovation Score is 69.0/100 (top 1% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score As of 2015–2025

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Shanghai?

Each dot is one of Shanghai’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Shanghai’s own 18.9 claims/patent is ABOVE the 13.1 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.

Shanghai vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView. 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 9 entities by Granted patents (volume) (X) and Avg claims / patent (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Volume + depthSelective & thoroughVolume over depthLean filer 822824826828830832 510152025 Granted patents (volume) Avg claims / patent The Gillette Company LLC - 830, 7.03The GilletteCorning Optical Communications LLC - 828, 18.79Corning Optical C…STMicroelectronics (Rousset) SAS - 828, 20.94Stmicroelectronic…University of Massachusetts - 828, 17.92University of Mas…Silicon Laboratories Inc. - 825, 19.43Silicon Laborator…E Ink Holdings Inc. - 824, 12.64E Ink HoldingsKaneka Corporation - 824, 12.93KanekaIndustry-academic Cooperation Foundation, Yonsei University - 823, 13.08Industry-academic…Shanghai United Imaging Healthcare Co., Ltd. - 825, 18.89Shanghai United I…
Shanghai vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

How Shanghai's grant cadence moved

Between 2020–2024, Shanghai United Imaging Healthcare Co., Ltd. received 635 grants versus 94 in 2015–2019 (+576% equal-window velocity, top decile growth). Across complete PatentsView years, output peaked in 2023 at 145 grants and bottomed in 2016 at 7. Lead class A61B accounts for 54.2% of the portfolio across 73 subclasses. Volume neighbours: The Gillette Company LLC (#538) and Industry-academic Cooperation Foundation, Yonsei University (#546).

Shanghai's three-year grant acceleration

From 2019–2021 to 2022–2024, Shanghai United Imaging Healthcare Co., Ltd. moved from 288 to 410 grants (1.42x the prior three-year total, a multiple, not a CAGR). Among 3,296 tracked assignees with ≥100 grants and ≥20 prior-period grants, that multiple ranks #501. See the growth leaderboard.

Who files at Shanghai's volume?

Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀

patents

What this shows Shanghai holds 825 patents at rank #542, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Source USPTO PatentsView, granted utility patents As of 2015–2025

Companies ranked near Shanghai

By rank, the assignees closest to #542 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in A61B (Diagnosis)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Shanghai's primary technology class.

Assignees with similar portfolio profiles

Two PlainPatent-derived peer sets for Shanghai, neither rank-band nor same-CPC leaders (those blocks stay above). In A61B (Diagnosis), Shanghai ranks #37 of 7,127 assignees by patent count in that subclass.

Similar innovation score

Nearest assignees by Innovation Score (69 here).

Carrier Corporation 69 SoftBank Corp. 69 Amgen Inc. 69 Cirrus Logic, Inc. 69

Similar claim depth

Nearest assignees by average claims per patent (18.9 here).

City University OF Hong Kong 18.9 avg Red Hat Israel Ltd. 18.9 avg Upm-kymmene Corporation 18.9 avg Sonicwall Inc. 18.9 avg

Shanghai's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

69 Top 1% higher than 99% of 49,997 US assignees

This assignee 0 100 every tracked assignee, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

050100150200 2016201720182019202020212022202320242025 96
USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2016–2025

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2016–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table
Shanghai United Imaging Healthcare Co., Ltd. patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year Patents Granted Share of Period
2016 7 0.8%
2017 10 1.2%
2018 14 1.7%
2019 63 7.6%
2020 113 13.7%
2021 112 13.6%
2022 129 15.6%
2023 145 17.6%
2024 136 16.5%
2025partial year 96 11.6%

Which technologies does Shanghai United Imaging Healthcare Co., Ltd. patent most?

Top 15 of 73 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

Shanghai United Imaging Healthcare Co., Ltd.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.

  • Shanghai United Imaging Healthcare Co., Ltd.'s lead technology class is A61B (DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; Identification), 54.2% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore A61B
  • Ranked #542 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
  • Compare Shanghai United Imaging Healthcare Co., Ltd. against The Gillette Company LLC, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
  • Innovation Score of 69.0/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page
  • USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
  • Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
  • USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.